Download PDF
Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2021; 69(05): 445-454
DOI: 10.1055/s-0040-1713168
Original Cardiovascular

Oversized versus Non-oversized Prosthesis: Midterm Outcomes after Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement Using SAPIEN 3 Valve

Dritan Useini 
1   Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Ruhr-University Hospital Bergmannsheil, Bochum, Germany
,
Blerta Beluli
2   Department of Internal Medicine, St. Anna Hospital, Herne, Germany
,
Hildegard Christ
3   Institute of Medical Statistics and Computational Biology (IMSB), University Hospital of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
,
Andreas Mügge
4   Department of Cardiology and Angiology, Ruhr-University Hospital Bergmannsheil, Bochum, Germany
,
Polykarpos Patsalis
4   Department of Cardiology and Angiology, Ruhr-University Hospital Bergmannsheil, Bochum, Germany
,
Markus Schlömicher
1   Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Ruhr-University Hospital Bergmannsheil, Bochum, Germany
,
Peter Haldenwang
1   Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Ruhr-University Hospital Bergmannsheil, Bochum, Germany
,
Matthias Bechtel
1   Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Ruhr-University Hospital Bergmannsheil, Bochum, Germany
,
Justus Strauch
1   Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Ruhr-University Hospital Bergmannsheil, Bochum, Germany
› Author Affiliations
› Further Information
    Permissions and Reprints All articles of this category

Abstract

Background A certain degree of prosthesis oversizing is recommended for the SAPIEN 3 (S3; Edwards Lifesciences Corp., Irvine, California, United States) to ensure device success. We aimed to investigate midterm outcomes in patients who received oversized (OS) S3 valve after transapical–transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TA-TAVR).

Methods Out of 122 patients with aortic stenosis who underwent TA-TAVR using S3 at our institution, 42 received OS prosthesis. We used computed tomography (CT) derived effective diameter to assess oversizing. We defined oversizing if the labeled diameter of the selected valve for implantation was ≥2 mm bigger than the effective annulus diameter calculated by the annulus area. We conducted a midterm follow-up and compared the OS cohort with the non-OS (nOS) cohort.

Results The study groups showed similar risk score and age (STS [Society of Thoracic Surgery] score: 5.4 ± 3; mean age: 80.7 ± 5.7). The 30-day mortality was 7.1% in OS versus 2.4% in nOS. The 30-day all-stroke was 2.4% in OS versus 0% in nOS. The 1- and 3-year all-cause mortality were 28.5 and 42.8% in OS versus 21.9 and 26.8% in nOS, respectively. Midterm freedom from death and from cardiocerebral events was similar in both groups. Moderate/severe paravalvular leakage occurred in 0% in OS versus 5.4% in nOS. The postdilation rate was 7.1% in OS versus 15.3% in nOS. The rate of new permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI) was 15.7% in OS versus 9.3% in nOS. The STS score was detected as an independent predictor of mortality.

Conclusion Oversizing reduces the risk of device failure and intraprocedural postdilation but increases the risk of PPI. Early and midterm morbidity and mortality after OS and nOS with S3 are comparable.

Keyword

heart valve - transapical - aortic valve - outcomes

Note

Meeting presentation: This study was presented at the Annual Meeting of the German Society of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Wiesbaden, February 18, 2019.




Publication History

Received: 15 December 2019

Accepted: 27 April 2020

Article published online:
20 July 2020

© 2021. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany

 

  • References

  • 1 Willson AB, Webb JG, Labounty TM. et al. 3-dimensional aortic annular assessment by multidetector computed tomography predicts moderate or severe paravalvular regurgitation after transcatheter aortic valve replacement: a multicenter retrospective analysis. J Am Coll Cardiol 2012; 59 (14) 1287-1294
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Binder RK, Rodés-Cabau J, Wood DA. et al. Transcatheter aortic valve replacement with the SAPIEN 3: a new balloon-expandable transcatheter heart valve. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2013; 6 (03) 293-300
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Husser O, Pellegrini C, Kessler T. et al. Predictors of permanent pacemaker implantations and new-onset conduction abnormalities with the SAPIEN 3 Balloon-Expandable Transcatheter Heart Valve. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2016; 9 (03) 244-254
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Pellegrini C, Kim WK, Holzamer A. et al. Multicenter evaluation of prosthesis oversizing of the SAPIEN 3 Transcatheter Heart Valve. Impact on device failure and new pacemaker implantations. Rev Esp Cardiol (Engl Ed) 2019; 72 (08) 641-648
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Kappetein AP, Head SJ, Généreux P. et al; Valve Academic Research Consortium-2. Updated standardized endpoint definitions for transcatheter aortic valve implantation: the Valve Academic Research Consortium-2 consensus document. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2013; 145 (01) 6-23
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Achenbach S, Delgado V, Hausleiter J, Schoenhagen P, Min JK, Leipsic JA. SCCT expert consensus document on computed tomography imaging before transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI)/transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr 2012; 6 (06) 366-380
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Blanke P, Reinöhl J, Schlensak C. et al. Prosthesis oversizing in balloon-expandable transcatheter aortic valve implantation is associated with contained rupture of the aortic root. Circ Cardiovasc Interv 2012; 5 (04) 540-548
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Leber AW, Eichinger W, Rieber J. et al. MSCT guided sizing of the Edwards SAPIEN XT TAVI device: impact of different degrees of oversizing on clinical outcome. Int J Cardiol 2013; 168 (03) 2658-2664
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Yang TH, Webb JG, Blanke P. et al. Incidence and severity of paravalvular aortic regurgitation with multidetector computed tomography nominal area oversizing or undersizing after transcatheter heart valve replacement with the SAPIEN 3: a comparison with the SAPIEN XT. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2015; 8 (03) 462-471
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Regueiro A, Linke A, Latib A. et al. Association between transcatheter aortic valve replacement and subsequent infective endocarditis and in-hospital Death. JAMA 2016; 316 (10) 1083-1092
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Kodali S, Pibarot P, Douglas PS. et al. Paravalvular regurgitation after transcatheter aortic valve replacement with the Edwards SAPIEN valve in the PARTNER trial: characterizing patients and impact on outcomes. Eur Heart J 2015; 36 (07) 449-456
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Terré JA, George I, Smith CR. Pros and cons of transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). Ann Cardiothorac Surg 2017; 6 (05) 444-452
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Kodali SK, Williams MR, Smith CR. et al; PARTNER Trial Investigators. Two-year outcomes after transcatheter or surgical aortic-valve replacement. N Engl J Med 2012; 366 (18) 1686-1695
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Vasa-Nicotera M, Sinning JM, Chin D. et al. Impact of paravalvular leakage on outcome in patients after transcatheter aortic valve implantation. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2012; 5 (08) 858-865
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Jilaihawi H, Makkar RR. Prognostic impact of aortic regurgitation after transcatheter aortic valve implantation. EuroIntervention 2012; ;8 Suppl Q: Q31-Q33
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Binder RK, Webb JG, Toggweiler S. et al. Impact of post-implant SAPIEN XT geometry and position on conduction disturbances, hemodynamic performance, and paravalvular regurgitation. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2013; 6 (05) 462-468
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Herrmann HC, Thourani VH, Kodali SK. et al; PARTNER Investigators. One-year clinical outcomes with SAPIEN 3 transcatheter aortic valve replacement in high-risk and inoperable patients with severe aortic stenosis. Circulation 2016; 134 (02) 130-140
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Pibarot P, Hahn RT, Weissman NJ. et al. Association of paravalvular regurgitation with 1-year outcomes after transcatheter aortic valve replacement with the SAPIEN 3 valve. JAMA Cardiol 2017; 2 (11) 1208-1216
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Athappan G, Patvardhan E, Tuzcu EM. et al. Incidence, predictors, and outcomes of aortic regurgitation after transcatheter aortic valve replacement: meta-analysis and systematic review of literature. J Am Coll Cardiol 2013; 61 (15) 1585-1595
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Webb J, Gerosa G, Lefèvre T. et al. Multicenter evaluation of a next-generation balloon-expandable transcatheter aortic valve. J Am Coll Cardiol 2014; 64 (21) 2235-2243
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Murray MI, Geis N, Pleger ST. et al. First experience with the new generation Edwards SAPIEN 3 aortic bioprosthesis: procedural results and short term outcome. J Interv Cardiol 2015; 28 (01) 109-116
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Manoharan G. Impact of technological changes on TAVI outcomes-for better, for worse or no change?. Rev Esp Cardiol (Engl Ed) 2017; 70 (09) 694-695
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Siontis GC, Jüni P, Pilgrim T. et al. Predictors of permanent pacemaker implantation in patients with severe aortic stenosis undergoing TAVR: a meta-analysis. J Am Coll Cardiol 2014; 64 (02) 129-140
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Maeno Y, Abramowitz Y, Kawamori H. et al. A highly predictive risk model for pacemaker implantation after TAVR. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 2017; 10 (10 Pt A): 1139-1147
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Khodaee F, Barakat M, Abbasi M, Dvir D, Azadani AN. Incomplete expansion of transcatheter aortic valves is associated with propensity for valve thrombosis. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg 2020; 30 (01) 39-46
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Blanke P, Pibarot P, Hahn R. et al. Computed tomography-based oversizing degrees and incidence of paravalvular regurgitation of a new generation transcatheter heart valve. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2017; 10 (08) 810-820
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Kempfert J, Van Linden A, Lehmkuhl L. et al. Aortic annulus sizing: echocardiographic versus computed tomography derived measurements in comparison with direct surgical sizing. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2012; 42 (04) 627-633
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Reents W, Barth S, Griese DP. et al. Transfemoral versus transapical transcatheter aortic valve implantation: a single-centre experience. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2019; 55 (04) 744-750
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Beve M, Auffret V, Belhaj Soulami R. et al. Comparison of the transarterial and transthoracic approaches in nontransfemoral transcatheter aortic valve implantation. Am J Cardiol 2019; 123 (09) 1501-1509
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar