Evaluating the Effectiveness of Small-Group Training in Teaching Medical Students Integral Clinical Eye Examination Skills

Abstract

Objective The aim of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of an interactive, small-group ophthalmology clinical training session by assessing medical students' self-confidence with eye examination skills and long-term retention of direct ophthalmoscopy skills.

Methods The second-year medical students participated in a one-time small-group clinical training session that taught essential components of the eye examination. Students reported their confidence with each component in pre- and postsession surveys. Eight months later, direct ophthalmoscopy skills were reassessed by having students visualize the optic nerves of standardized patients and identify the matching optic nerve photograph in a multiple-choice quiz.

Results Among 197 second-year medical students who participated in the training session, 172 students completed the presession survey (87.3% response rate) and 108 students completed the postsession survey (54.8% response rate). Following the training session, students reported increased self-confidence (p < 0.01) overall. A total of 107 (107/108; 99.1%) students reported that they visualized the optic nerve head, and 80 out of 85 (94.1%) students stated that they preferred the PanOptic ophthalmoscope over the traditional direct ophthalmoscope. Students reported greater self-confidence using the PanOptic ophthalmoscope (p < 0.01). In the 8-month follow-up assessment, 42 medical students (42/197; 21.3%) completed the exercise. A total of 41 (41/42; 97.6%) students stated that they saw the optic nerve with the PanOptic ophthalmoscope; 24 (24/42; 57.1%) students identified the correct optic nerve image using the PanOptic ophthalmoscope on a standardized patient; 14 (14/42; 33.3%) students stated that they saw the optic nerve with the traditional direct ophthalmoscope; and 4 (4/42; 9.1%) students from the same cohort identified the correct optic nerve image with the traditional direct ophthalmoscope on a standardized patient.

Conclusion Our comprehensive, one-time eye examination skills training session seeks to prepare students to incorporate these skills in future patient care. Students' overall confidence improved in each aspect of the eye examination that was covered. A follow-up assessment on students' direct ophthalmoscopy skills suggests that the PanOptic ophthalmoscope allows for superior skills retention as compared with the traditional direct ophthalmoscope. We believe that the PanOptic ophthalmoscope should be further integrated into medical education and clinical practice.

Keywords

eye examination - direct ophthalmoscopy - medical student education - small-group training - confidence level

Ethical Approval

The University of Miami Institutional Review Board determined that this study meets the criteria for an exemption as described in Federal Regulation 45 CFR 46.104.

^∗ The authors contributed equally to this work.

• References

• 1 International Task Force on Opthalmic Education of Medical Students; International Council of Opthalmology. Principles and guidelines of a curriculum for ophthalmic education of medical students. Klin Monatsbl Augenheilkd 2006; 223 (Suppl. 05) S1-S19
• 2 Graubart EB, Waxman EL, Forster SH. , et al. Ophthalmology objectives for medical students: revisiting what every graduating medical student should know. Ophthalmology 2018; 125 (12) 1842-1843
• 3 Morad Y, Barkana Y, Avni I, Kozer E. Fundus anomalies: what the pediatrician's eye can't see. Int J Qual Health Care 2004; 16 (05) 363-365
• 4 Roberts E, Morgan R, King D, Clerkin L. Funduscopy: a forgotten art?. Postgrad Med J 1999; 75 (883) 282-284
• 5 Promes SB, Chudgar SM, Grochowski CO. , et al. Gaps in procedural experience and competency in medical school graduates. Acad Emerg Med 2009; 16 (Suppl. 02) S58-S62
• 6 Quillen DA, Harper RA, Haik BG. Medical student education in ophthalmology: crisis and opportunity. Ophthalmology 2005; 112 (11) 1867-1868
• 7 Stern GA. ; The Association of University Professors of Ophthalmology Education Committee. Teaching ophthalmology to primary care physicians. Arch Ophthalmol 1995; 113 (06) 722-724
• 8 Hitchings RA. Visual disability and the elderly. BMJ 1989; 298 (6681): 1126-1127
• 9 Jacobs DS. Teaching doctors about the eye: trends in the education of medical students and primary care residents. Surv Ophthalmol 1998; 42 (04) 383-389
• 10 Druck J, Valley MA, Lowenstein SR. Procedural skills training during emergency medicine residency: are we teaching the right things?. West J Emerg Med 2009; 10 (03) 152-156
• 11 Mottow-Lippa L. Ophthalmology in the medical school curriculum: reestablishing our value and effecting change. Ophthalmology 2009; 116 (07) 1235-1236 , 1236.e1
• 12 Corbett EC. Recommendations for clinical skills curricula for undergraduate medical education. Association of American Medical Colleges Task Force on the Preclerkship Clinical Skills Education of Medical Students 2008 ; Available at: stfm.org/media/1363/clinicalskills_oct09qxdpdf.pdf . Accessed August 14, 2019
• 13 Shah M, Knoch D, Waxman E. The state of ophthalmology medical student education in the United States and Canada, 2012 through 2013. Ophthalmology 2014; 121 (06) 1160-1163
• 14 Kotsis SV, Chung KC. Application of the “see one, do one, teach one” concept in surgical training. Plast Reconstr Surg 2013; 131 (05) 1194-1201
• 15 Benbassat J, Polak BC, Javitt JC. Objectives of teaching direct ophthalmoscopy to medical students. Acta Ophthalmol 2012; 90 (06) 503-507
• 16 Sussman EJ, Tsiaras WG, Soper KA. Diagnosis of diabetic eye disease. JAMA 1982; 247 (23) 3231-3234