Erratum: Doxorubicin-Immersed Skeletal Muscle Grafts Promote Peripheral Nerve Regeneration Across a 10-mm Defect in the Rat Sciatic Nerve

It has been brought to the publisher's attention that [Fig. 4] appeared incorrectly in the above article published online on August 13, 2019, in the Journal of Reconstructive Microsurgery (DOI: 10.1055/s-0039-1694740). The correct [Fig. 4] with its legends appears as listed below.

Fig. 4 Electrophysiology and target muscle atrophy (percentage of the uninjured side).No valid waveform was obtained from any of the animals in the Mgraft-w/o-Dox group. The CMAPs in the N-graft group were significantly larger than those in the M-graft-w-Dox group (*p< 0.05) (top-left panel). There were no significant differences in motor nerve conduction velocity between the M-graft-w-Dox and N-graft groups (top right). The wet muscle weight percentage (bottom) in the M-graft-w-Dox and N-graft groups was significantly greater than that in the M-graft-w/o-Dox group (**p < 0.001), whereas, no significant difference was observed between the M-graft-w-Dox and N-graft groups. CMAPs, compound muscle action potentials; M-graft-w-Dox, muscle grafts with doxorubicin; M-graft-w/o-Dox, muscle grafts without doxorubicin; N-graft, nerve graft.