Repair of Longitudinal Meniscal Tears by Single or Double Vertical Loop Sutures: In vitro Biomechanical Study under Cyclic Loading

Abstract

One of the factors affecting the healing of a meniscus repair is the primary stability of the tear. The purpose of this study is to compare single and double vertical loop (SVL vs. DVL) meniscal suture configurations by measuring elongation under cyclic loading and failure properties under ultimate load. We hypothesized that DVL configuration would have superior biomechanical properties than SVL. Twenty-two intact lateral menisci were harvested from patients who required total knee arthroplasty. A 20-mm longitudinal full-thickness cut was made 3 mm from the peripheral rim to simulate a longitudinal tear. Two groups were formed and group randomization was done according to patient age and gender (SVL group: mean age 68.3 years [range, 58–78 years], five males, six females; DVL group: mean age 67.4 years [range, 59–77 years], six males, five females). Cyclic loading was performed between 5 and 30 N at a frequency of 1 Hz for 500 cycles. Then, the meniscus repair construct was loaded until failure. Statistical analysis was performed using the t-test and the Mann–Whitney's U-test. During the early phases of cyclic loading, three specimens from each group failed because of suture pull out and are excluded from the study. At the end of 500 cycles, there was significantly less displacement in the DVL group than the SVL group (6.13 ± 1.04 vs. 9.3 ± 2.59 mm) (p < 0.05). No significant difference was found between groups regarding ultimate load to failure measurements (p > 0.05). All specimens in SVL and five specimens in DVL groups failed in the form of suture pull out from the meniscus tissue. Longitudinal meniscal tears repaired with DVL configuration had less elongation value under cyclic loading compared with SVL configuration. Because of its superior biomechanical properties, it would be more secure to repair large and instable longitudinal meniscal tears by the DVL technique. This is a level II study.

Keywords

meniscal tear - longitudinal tear - double vertical loop - cyclic loading

• References

• 1 Fairbank TJ. Knee joint changes after meniscectomy. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1948; 30B [phone]
• 2 Jones RE, Smith EC, Reisch JS. Effects of medial meniscectomy in patients older than forty years. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1978; 60 (06) 783-786
• 3 Lanzer WL, Komenda G. Changes in articular cartilage after meniscectomy. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1990; (252) 41-48
• 4 Salata MJ, Gibbs AE, Sekiya JK. A systematic review of clinical outcomes in patients undergoing meniscectomy. Am J Sports Med 2010; 38 (09) 1907-1916
• 5 Tapper EM, Hoover NW. Late results after meniscectomy. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1969; 51 (03) 517-526 , passim
• 6 Barber-Westin SD, Noyes FR. Clinical healing rates of meniscus repairs of tears in the central-third (red-white) zone. Arthroscopy 2014; 30 (01) 134-146
• 7 Fillingham YA, Riboh JC, Erickson BJ, Bach Jr BR, Yanke AB. Inside-out versus all-inside repair of isolated meniscal tears: an updated systematic review. Am J Sports Med 2017; 45 (01) 234-242
• 8 Becker R, Stärke C, Heymann M, Nebelung W. Biomechanical properties under cyclic loading of seven meniscus repair techniques. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2002; (400) 236-245
• 9 Kocabey Y, Taser O, Nyland J. , et al. Pullout strength of meniscal repair after cyclic loading: comparison of vertical, horizontal, and oblique suture techniques. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2006; 14 (10) 998-1003
• 10 Rimmer MG, Nawana NS, Keene GC, Pearcy MJ. Failure strengths of different meniscal suturing techniques. Arthroscopy 1995; 11 (02) 146-150
• 11 Seil R, Rupp S, Kohn DM. Cyclic testing of meniscal sutures. Arthroscopy 2000; 16 (05) 505-510
• 12 Nepple JJ, Dunn WR, Wright RW. Meniscal repair outcomes at greater than five years: a systematic literature review and meta-analysis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2012; 94 (24) 2222-2227
• 13 Aşik M, Sener N, Akpinar S, Durmaz H, Göksan A. Strength of different meniscus suturing techniques. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 1997; 5 (02) 80-83
• 14 Kohn D, Siebert W. Meniscus suture techniques: a comparative biomechanical cadaver study. Arthroscopy 1989; 5 (04) 324-327
• 15 Warren RF. Arthroscopic meniscus repair. Arthroscopy 1985; 1 (03) 170-172
• 16 Richards DP, Barber FA, Herbert MA. Compressive loads in longitudinal lateral meniscus tears: a biomechanical study in porcine knees. Arthroscopy 2005; 21 (12) 1452-1456
• 17 Richards DP, Barber FA, Herbert MA. Meniscal tear biomechanics: loads across meniscal tears in human cadaveric knees. Orthopedics 2008; 31 (04) 347-350
• 18 Haklar U, Donmez F, Basaran SH, Canbora MK. Results of arthroscopic repair of partial- or full-thickness longitudinal medial meniscal tears by single or double vertical sutures using the inside-out technique. Am J Sports Med 2013; 41 (03) 596-602
• 19 Zantop T, Temmig K, Weimann A, Eggers AK, Raschke MJ, Petersen W. Elongation and structural properties of meniscal repair using suture techniques in distraction and shear force scenarios: biomechanical evaluation using a cyclic loading protocol. Am J Sports Med 2006; 34 (05) 799-805
• 20 Matsubara H, Okazaki K, Izawa T. , et al. New suture method for radial tears of the meniscus: biomechanical analysis of cross-suture and double horizontal suture techniques using cyclic load testing. Am J Sports Med 2012; 40 (02) 414-418