PDF icon Download PDF
Am J Perinatol 2021; 38(03): 273-277
DOI: 10.1055/s-0039-1696674
Original Article

Comparing Glucose Challenge Test Screening Thresholds in Obese and Overweight Gravidas

Caitlin MacGregor
1   University of Chicago Pritzker School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois
,
Phin Has
2   Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island
,
Deanna Nardella
3   Brown University Warren Alpert Medical School, Providence, Rhode Island
,
Erika Werner
3   Brown University Warren Alpert Medical School, Providence, Rhode Island
› Author Affiliations
Funding None.
› Further Information
Also available ateRefHebammen
   Permissions and Reprints
Preview

Abstract

Objective Given the paucity of contemporary data examining glucose challenge test (GCT), thresholds for gestational diabetes (GDM) screening in obese and overweight women, we sought to compare the sensitivity and testing characteristics of different screen positive GCT cut-offs in women with a prepregnancy body mass index (BMI) ≥ 25 kg/m2.

Study Design This is a retrospective cohort study of obese and overweight women with singleton pregnancies who underwent GCT between 24 and 296/7 weeks and had a value between 130 and 199 mg/dL necessitating a 3-hour glucose tolerance test (GTT). Exclusion criteria were pregestational diabetes mellitus, multigestation, use of diabetes medications, and bariatric surgery.

Results Between August 2015 and January 2016, 19% (n = 496) of women with a BMI ≥ 25 kg/m2 required a GTT to test for GDM, 27.8% (n = 138) of whom were diagnosed with GDM. Mean age was 30 years, mean BMI = 31.6 kg/m2, and 30.4% were Hispanic. The 130 mg/dL threshold compared with 140 mg/dL was more sensitive (absolute increase: 11.3%, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 6.7–17%), but less specific (absolute decrease: 6.4%, 95% CI: 5.5–7.5%).

Conclusion Shared decision making should be used to determine GCT cut-offs as some patients may prefer to undergo a GTT rather than miss a diagnosis of GDM.

Keywords

gestational diabetes - obesity - pregnancy - screening test


Publication History

Received: 15 April 2019

Accepted: 26 July 2019

Article published online:
06 September 2019

© 2019. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA