Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2020; 68(07): 608-615
DOI: 10.1055/s-0039-1695779
Original Cardiovascular

SAVR versus TAVI: What about the Hemodynamic Performance? An In Vivo and In Vitro Analysis

1  Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Uniklinik Koln, Koln, Germany
,
Parwis Baradaran Rahmanian*
1  Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Uniklinik Koln, Koln, Germany
,
Daniel Giese
2  Department of Radiology, Uniklinik Koln, Koln, Germany
,
Elmar W. Kuhn
1  Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Uniklinik Koln, Koln, Germany
,
1  Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Uniklinik Koln, Koln, Germany
,
Süreyya Kaya
1  Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Uniklinik Koln, Koln, Germany
,
1  Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Uniklinik Koln, Koln, Germany
,
Stephan Baldus
3  Department of Cardiology, University of Cologne, Heart Center, Cologne, Germany
,
Navid Mader
1  Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Uniklinik Koln, Koln, Germany
,
Thorsten C.W. Wahlers
1  Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Uniklinik Koln, Koln, Germany
› Author Affiliations

Abstract

Background Surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) is nowadays discussed whether it remains the gold standard of treatment. In the last decade, there has been a tremendous increase in transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) due to the growing expertise and excellent results of the catheter-based approach. We, therefore, retrospectively compared the rapid deployment valve (RDV), the Edwards Intuity valve (IEV), with the Edwards Sapien 3 (S3V) with regard to post-procedural hemodynamics.

Methods A total of 246 patients treated with TAVI or SAVR between February 2009 and November 2015 were included. One-hundred twenty-five patients were analyzed in the SAVR group and compared with 121 patients undergoing TAVI. Transvalvular pressure gradients (PGs) and the incidence and extent of aortic regurgitation (AR) were compared post-procedurally by echocardiography for each valve size. In vitro hemodynamics were analyzed by placing both valves into an aortic silicone phantom connected to a pulsatile flow pump and measured using phase-contrast magnetic resonance imaging (4D flow MRI).

Results Post-procedurally, mean transvalvular PGs for the 23 mm valves were 9 (7;11.5) versus 13 (9;18) (p < 0.001), whereas maximum PGs were 16.5 (14;22) versus 25.5 mm Hg (17.5;34) (p < 0.001) in IEV and S3V patients, respectively. The 21 mm IEV showed significantly lower transvalvular PGs compared with the 23 mm S3V: mean PGs: 11 (8;13) versus 13 (9;18) (p < 0.05); maximum PG: 19.5 (13;24) versus 25.5 (18;34) mm Hg (p < 0.05). Analysis revealed significantly lower post-procedural transvalvular PGs for larger valves sizes. With respect to AR, the incidence of AR was significantly lower in IEV group (p < 0.05). In vitro velocities and turbulent kinetic energy values showed similar results between both valves.

Conclusion Implanted RDVs presented a lower incidence of paravalvular regurgitation and were associated with significantly lower post-procedural transvalvular PGs, especially for small valve sizes. Our data might support the application of rapid deployment aortic valves in patients with small aortic annulus in the TAVI era.

Authors' Contribution

KE & PR: study design, data interpretation, statistical analysis, wrote the manuscript.


DG: manuscript preparation, in vitro analysis, and data interpretation.


EWK: data collection, statistical analysis, literature search.


ID: data collection, literature search.


SK: data interpretation, manuscript preparation.


CW: data interpretation, manuscript preparation.


SB: data interpretation, manuscript preparation.


NM: study design, data interpretation, manuscript preparation.


TW: study design, data interpretation, manuscript preparation.


* Both the authors contributed equally to the manuscript.




Publication History

Received: 10 May 2019

Accepted: 15 July 2019

Publication Date:
10 September 2019 (online)

© 2020. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Stuttgart · New York