Download PDF
Facial Plast Surg 2019; 35(03): 219-223
DOI: 10.1055/s-0039-1688797
Original Article
Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.

Superficial Dermal Fillers with Hyaluronic Acid

Jonathan T. Bacos 
1   Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois
,
Steven H. Dayan
2   Department of Facial Plastic Surgery, Chicago Center for Facial Plastic Surgery, Chicago, Illinois
3   Department of Otolaryngology, University of Illinois, Chicago, Illinois
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
12 June 2019 (online)

   Buy Article Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Minimally invasive aesthetic procedures with hyaluronic acid filler have increased drastically since their development in 1989. Patients' desires to avoid surgery and achieve rapid results with minimal recovery led to a transformation in facial plastic surgery, demanding that aesthetic surgeons become proficient in nonsurgical augmentation. Over the years, new hyaluronic acid filler products were developed with different intrinsic properties, allowing clinicians to better treat different deficiencies of the face, reduce postprocedural pain, and optimize outcomes. The purpose of this article is to review the current state of nonsurgical facial plastic surgery with the superficial dermal filler, hyaluronic acid.

Keywords

dermal fillers - hyaluronic acid - esthetics - aging - surgery - plastic
 

  • References

  • 1 American Society of Plastic Surgeons. 2017 Plastic Surgery Statistics Report. Available at: https://www.plasticsurgery.org/documents/News/Statistics/2017/plastic-surgery-statistics-report-2017.pdf . Accessed November 20, 2018
    PubMed
  • 2 Beasley KL, Weiss MA, Weiss RA. Hyaluronic acid fillers: a comprehensive review. Facial Plast Surg 2009; 25 (02) 86-94
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Donofrio LM. Fat distribution: a morphologic study of the aging face. Dermatol Surg 2000; 26 (12) 1107-1112
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Rohrich RJ, Pessa JE, Ristow B. The youthful cheek and the deep medial fat compartment. Plast Reconstr Surg 2008; 121 (06) 2107-2112
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Shaw Jr RB, Katzel EB, Koltz PF, Kahn DM, Girotto JA, Langstein HN. Aging of the mandible and its aesthetic implications. Plast Reconstr Surg 2010; 125 (01) 332-342
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Wang F, Garza LA, Kang S. , et al. In vivo stimulation of de novo collagen production caused by cross-linked hyaluronic acid dermal filler injections in photodamaged human skin. Arch Dermatol 2007; 143 (02) 155-163
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Edsman K, Nord LI, Ohrlund A, Lärkner H, Kenne AH. Gel properties of hyaluronic acid dermal fillers. Dermatol Surg 2012; 38 (7 Pt 2): 1170-1179
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Wilson AJ, Taglienti AJ, Chang CS, Low DW, Percec I. Current applications of facial volumization with fillers. Plast Reconstr Surg 2016; 137 (05) 872e-889e
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Alam M, Tung R. Injection technique in neurotoxins and fillers: indications, products, and outcomes. J Am Acad Dermatol 2018; 79 (03) 423-435
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Smith KC, Comite SL, Balasubramanian S, Carver A, Liu JF. Vibration anesthesia: a noninvasive method of reducing discomfort prior to dermatologic procedures. Dermatol Online J 2004; 10 (02) 1
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Weinkle SH, Bank DE, Boyd CM, Gold MH, Thomas JA, Murphy DK. A multi-center, double-blind, randomized controlled study of the safety and effectiveness of Juvéderm injectable gel with and without lidocaine. J Cosmet Dermatol 2009; 8 (03) 205-210
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Monheit GD, Campbell RM, Neugent H. , et al. Reduced pain with use of proprietary hyaluronic acid with lidocaine for correction of nasolabial folds: a patient-blinded, prospective, randomized controlled trial. Dermatol Surg 2010; 36 (01) 94-101
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Fulton J, Caperton C, Weinkle S, Dewandre L. Filler injections with the blunt-tip microcannula. J Drugs Dermatol 2012; 11 (09) 1098-1103
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Pavicic T, Frank K, Erlbacher K. , et al. Precision in dermal filling: a comparison between needle and cannula when using soft tissue fillers. J Drugs Dermatol 2017; 16 (09) 866-872
    Google Scholar
  • 15 Macdonald MR, Spiegel JH, Raven RB, Kabaker SS, Maas CS. An anatomical approach to glabellar rhytids. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1998; 124 (12) 1315-1320
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Pickrell KL. Reconstructive plastic surgery of the face. Clin Symp 1967; 19 (03) 71-99
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Carruthers J, Carruthers A. A prospective, randomized, parallel group study analyzing the effect of BTX-A (Botox) and nonanimal sourced hyaluronic acid (NASHA, Restylane) in combination compared with NASHA (Restylane) alone in severe glabellar rhytides in adult female subjects: treatment of severe glabellar rhytides with a hyaluronic acid derivative compared with the derivative and BTX-A. Dermatol Surg 2003; 29 (08) 802-809
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Beleznay K, Carruthers JD, Humphrey S, Jones D. Avoiding and treating blindness from fillers: a review of the world literature. Dermatol Surg 2015; 41 (10) 1097-1117
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Rodriguez LM, Martin SJ, Lask G. Targeted digital pressure to potentially minimize intravascular retrograde filler injections. Dermatol Surg 2017; 43 (02) 309-312
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Minkis K, Whittington A, Alam M. Dermatologic surgery emergencies: complications caused by occlusion and blood pressure. J Am Acad Dermatol 2016; 75 (02) 243-262
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Carruthers JD, Carruthers A. Facial sculpting and tissue augmentation. Dermatol Surg 2005; 31 (11 Pt 2): 1604-1612
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Shaw Jr RB, Katzel EB, Koltz PF. , et al. Aging of the facial skeleton: aesthetic implications and rejuvenation strategies. Plast Reconstr Surg 2011; 127 (01) 374-383
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Shaw Jr RB, Kahn DM. Aging of the midface bony elements: a three-dimensional computed tomographic study. Plast Reconstr Surg 2007; 119 (02) 675-681 , discussion 682–683
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Pessa JE, Zadoo VP, Mutimer KL. , et al. Relative maxillary retrusion as a natural consequence of aging: combining skeletal and soft-tissue changes into an integrated model of midfacial aging. Plast Reconstr Surg 1998; 102 (01) 205-212
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Pessa JE, Zadoo VP, Yuan C. , et al. Concertina effect and facial aging: nonlinear aspects of youthfulness and skeletal remodeling, and why, perhaps, infants have jowls. Plast Reconstr Surg 1999; 103 (02) 635-644
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Rohrich RJ, Pessa JE. The fat compartments of the face: anatomy and clinical implications for cosmetic surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg 2007; 119 (07) 2219-2227 , discussion 2228–2231
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Mendelson BC. Anatomic study of the retaining ligaments of the face and applications for facial rejuvenation. Aesthetic Plast Surg 2013; 37 (03) 513-515
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Gierloff M, Stöhring C, Buder T, Gassling V, Açil Y, Wiltfang J. Aging changes of the midfacial fat compartments: a computed tomographic study. Plast Reconstr Surg 2012; 129 (01) 263-273
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Goldberg DJ. Correction of tear trough deformity with novel porcine collagen dermal filler (Dermicol-P35). Aesthet Surg J 2009; 29 (3, Suppl): S9-S11
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Kane MA. Treatment of tear trough deformity and lower lid bowing with injectable hyaluronic acid. Aesthetic Plast Surg 2005; 29 (05) 363-367
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 31 Tan SL, Brandt MG, Yeung JC, Doyle PC, Moore CC. The aesthetic unit principle of facial aging. JAMA Facial Plast Surg 2015; 17 (01) 33-38
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 32 Pilsl U, Anderhuber F, Rzany B. Anatomy of the cheek: implications for soft tissue augmentation. Dermatol Surg 2012; 38 (7 Pt 2): 1254-1262
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 33 Kim HS, Lee KL, Gil YC, Hu KS, Tansatit T, Kim HJ. Topographic anatomy of the infraorbital artery and its clinical implications for nasolabial fold augmentation. Plast Reconstr Surg 2018; 142 (03) 273e-280e
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 34 Hedén P. Nasal reshaping with hyaluronic acid: an alternative or complement to surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 2016; 4 (11) e1120
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 35 Johnston VS, Solomon CJ, Gibson SJ, Pallares-Bejarano A. Human facial beauty: current theories and methodologies. Arch Facial Plast Surg 2003; 5 (05) 371-377
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 36 Sarnoff DS, Saini R, Gotkin RH. Comparison of filling agents for lip augmentation. Aesthet Surg J 2008; 28 (05) 556-563
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 37 Zimbler MS, Kokoska MS, Thomas JR. Anatomy and pathophysiology of facial aging. Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am 2001; 9 (02) 179-187 , vii v ii.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 38 Carruthers J, Carruthers A. Soft Tissue Augmentation. 3rd ed. London/New York: Elsevier Saunders; 2013
    Google Scholar
  • 39 Coleman SR, Grover R. The anatomy of the aging face: volume loss and changes in 3-dimensional topography. Aesthet Surg J 2006; 26 (1S): S4-S9
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 40 Hirsch RJ, Stier M. Complications of soft tissue augmentation. J Drugs Dermatol 2008; 7 (09) 841-845
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 41 Cohen JL. Understanding, avoiding, and managing dermal filler complications. Dermatol Surg 2008; 34 (Suppl. 01) S92-S99
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 42 Dayan SH, Bacos JT, Gandhi ND, Ho TT, Kalbag A. Assessment of the impact of perioral rejuvenation with hyaluronic acid filler on projected first impressions and mood perceptions. Dermatol Surg 2019; 45 (01) 99-107
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar