Download PDF
CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Journal of Morphological Sciences 2019; 36(02): 097-104
DOI: 10.1055/s-0039-1688694
Original Article
Thieme Revinter Publicações Ltda Rio de Janeiro, Brazil

Morphometric Analysis of the Foramen Magnum in Dry Human Skulls in Northeastern Brazil

Jalles Dantas de Lucena
1   Department of Morphofunctional Sciences, Universidade Federal do Ceará, Fortaleza, CE, Brazil
,
João Victor Souza Sanders
2   Medical School, Universidade Federal do Ceará, Fortaleza, CE, Brazil
,
Hudson Martins de Brito
2   Medical School, Universidade Federal do Ceará, Fortaleza, CE, Brazil
,
Gilberto Santos Cerqueira
3   Department of Morphology, Medical School, Universidade Federal do Ceará, Fortaleza, CE, Brazil
,
Ivson Bezerra da Silva
4   Department of Morphology, Health Science Center, Universidade Federal da Paraíba, João Pessoa, PB, Brazil
,
André de Sá Braga Oliveira
4   Department of Morphology, Health Science Center, Universidade Federal da Paraíba, João Pessoa, PB, Brazil
› Author Affiliations Funding The present research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or nonprofit sectors.
Further Information

Publication History

24 September 2018

28 March 2019

Publication Date:
23 May 2019 (online)

   Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Introduction The successful identification of the deceased is vital to the progress of any forensic investigation. This process of identification is facilitated by the determination of age, gender, and ethnicity. One of the main biological traits to be established from skeletal remains is the gender of the individual. In situations in which there are fragmented and mutilated skeletal remains, gender determination is relatively difficult, and it becomes important to establish the accuracy of individual bones. The basal region of the occipital bone is covered by a large volume of soft tissue and is therefore in a relatively well-protected anatomical position and, as such, classification of gender using the occipital bone may prove to be useful in cases of significantly disrupted remains. The present study aims to describe and analyze the morphological aspects of the foramen magnum (FM) in the population of the northeastern region of Brazil.

Material and Methods A total of 159 dry skulls (88 males and 71 females) were subjected to measurement by a digital caliper (DIGIMESS®, Instrumentos de Precisão Ltda., São Paulo, Brazil) and was assessed for anteroposterior diameter (APD) and transverse diameter (TD), FM area, FM index (FMI), anterior, posterior and maximum lateral intercondylar distance. The measurement of all of these parameters sought to classify the FM in nine different types.

Results The pentagonal type was the most found in males (11.31%), and the biconvex in females (18.86%). The less frequent type in males was the pear type (2.53%), and in females the less frequent types were the pentagonal and the heptagonal types (2.53% each). Using the traditional anthropological classification of Martin et al,[13] the most common type of FM was the brachytrematous, with 49.68% of the total skulls. The APD, TD and FM area were higher in males than in females, only in the oval FM type.

Conclusion The sexual dimorphism of the dimensions of the FM is established. However, there is a wide variability in the shape and measures in different populations, and to our knowledge this is the first study that shows the different types of the FM in the population of the northeastern region of Brazil.

Keywords

anatomy and anthropology - brazil - foramen magnum - occipital bone - skull
 

  • References

  • 1 Scheuer L, Black S. The juvenile skeleton. New York: Elsevier Academic Press; 2004
    Google Scholar
  • 2 Moore KL, Dalley AF, Agur AMR. Anatomia Orientada para a Clínica. 7th ed. Rio de Janeiro: Guanabara Koogan; 2014
    Google Scholar
  • 3 Bruneau M, George B. Foramen magnum meningiomas: detailed surgical approaches and technical aspects at Lariboisière Hospital and review of the literature. Neurosurg Rev 2008; 31 (01) 19-32 , discussion 32–33
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Günay Y, Altinkök M. The value of the size of foramen magnum in sex determination. J Clin Forensic Med 2000; 7 (03) 147-149
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Gapert R, Black S, Last J. Sex determination from the foramen magnum: discriminant function analysis in an eighteenth and nineteenth century British sample. Int J Legal Med 2009; 123 (01) 25-33
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Kanodia G, Parihar V, Yadav YR, Bhatele PR, Sharma D. Morphometric analysis of posterior fossa and foramen magnum. J Neurosci Rural Pract 2012; 3 (03) 261-266
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Goel A. Can foramen magnum decompression surgery become historical?. J Craniovertebr Junction Spine 2015; 6 (02) 49-50
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Ozcetin M, Arslan MT, Karapinar B. An achondroplasic case with foramen magnum stenosis, hydrocephaly, cortical atrophy, respiratory failure and sympathetic dysfunction. Iran J Pediatr 2012; 22 (01) 121-124
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Vanrell JP. Odontologia legal e antropologia forense. Rio de Janeiro: Guanabara Koogan; 2002
    Google Scholar
  • 10 Aragão JA, Pereira RO, Moraes RZC, Reis FP. Morphological Types of Foramen Magnum. Annu Res Rev Biol 2014; 4: 1372-1378
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Teixeira WR. Sex identification utilizing the size of the foramen magnum. Am J Forensic Med Pathol 1982; 3 (03) 203-206
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Routal RR, Pal GP, Bhagawat SS, Tamankar BP. Metrical studies with sexual dimorphism in foramen magnum of human crania. J Anat Soc India 1984; 2: 85-89
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Martin R, Saller K. Lehrbuch der Anthropologie. Stuttgart: Gustav Fischer Verlag; 1959
    Google Scholar
  • 14 Burdan F, Dworzanska A, Dworzanski W. , et al. Foramen Magnum - New and Old Anthropological Data. G J Anthropol Res 2014; 1: 25-34
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Chethan P, Prakash KG, Murlimanju BV. , et al. Morphological analysis and morphometry of the foramen magnum: an anatomical investigation. Turk Neurosurg 2012; 22 (04) 416-419
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Murshed KA, Çiçekcibaşi AE, Tuncer I. Morphometric evaluation of the foramen magnum and variations in its shape: a study on computerized tomographic images of normal adults. Turk J Med Sci 2003; 33: 301-306
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Nevell L, Wood B. Cranial base evolution within the hominin clade. J Anat 2008; 212 (04) 455-468
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Tubbs RS, Griessenauer CJ, Loukas M, Shoja MM, Cohen-Gadol AA. Morphometric analysis of the foramen magnum: an anatomic study. Neurosurgery 2010; 66 (02) 385-388 , discussion 388
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Sandeep A, Sharma SK, Siddiqui SW, Khatri S. Morphometry and surgical importance of foramen magnum. Int J Anat Res 2017; 5: 3464-3469
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Muthukumar N, Swaminathan R, Venkatesh G, Bhanumathy SP. A morphometric analysis of the foramen magnum region as it relates to the transcondylar approach. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2005; 147 (08) 889-895
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Vinutha SP, Shubha R. Morphometry and sexual dimorphism in foramen magnum: a study of human skull bones. Int J Anat Res 2016; 4: 2593-2599
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 De Villiers H. The Skull of the South African Negro: A Biometrical and Morphological Study. 1st ed. Johannesburg: Witwatersrand University Press; 1968
    Google Scholar
  • 23 Richards GD, Jabbour RS. Foramen magnum ontogeny in Homo sapiens: a functional matrix perspective. Anat Rec (Hoboken) 2011; 294 (02) 199-216
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Burdan F, Szumiło J, Walocha J. , et al. Morphology of the foramen magnum in young Eastern European adults. Folia Morphol (Warsz) 2012; 71 (04) 205-216
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Calvy TM, Segall HD, Gilles FH. , et al. CT anatomy of the craniovertebral junction in infants and children. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1987; 8 (03) 489-494
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Coqueugniot H. Le crane d'Homo sapiens em Eurasie: Croissance et variation depuis 100 000 ans. In: British Archaelogical Reports International Series, London: British Archaelogical Reports: 1999
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Shanthi CH, Lokanadham S. Morphometric Study on Foramen Magnum of Human Skulls. Med Sci 2013; 2: 792-798
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Manoel C, Prado FB, Caria PHF, Groppo FC. Morphometric analysis of the foramen magnum in human skulls of brazilian individuals: its relation to gender. Braz J Morphol Sci 2009; 26: 104-108
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Jain D, Jasuja OP, Nath S. Evaluation of foramen magnum in sex determination from human crania by using discriminant function analysis. El Med J 2014; 2: 89-92
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Uysal S, Gokharman D, Kacar M, Tuncbilek I, Kosa U. Estimation of sex by 3D CT measurements of the foramen magnum. J Forensic Sci 2005; 50 (06) 1310-1314
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 31 Sendemir E, Savci G, Cimen A. Evaluation of the foramen magnum dimensions. Kaibogaku Zasshi 1994; 69 (01) 50-52
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 32 Burdan F, Umławska W, Dworzański W. , et al. Anatomical variances and dimensions of the superior orbital fissure and foramen ovale in adults. Folia Morphol (Warsz) 2011; 70 (04) 263-271
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 33 Raghavendra Babu YP, Kanchan T, Attiku Y, Dixit PN, Kotian MS. Sex estimation from foramen magnum dimensions in an Indian population. J Forensic Leg Med 2012; 19 (03) 162-167
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 34 Aghakhani K, Kazemzadeh N, Ghafurian F, Soltani B, Soltani S. Gender determination using diagnostic values of foramen magnum. Int J Med Toxicol Forensic Med 2016; 6: 29-35
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 35 Gapert R, Black S, Last J. Test of age-related variation in the craniometry of the adult human foramen magnum region: implications for sex determination methods. Forensic Sci Med Pathol 2013; 9 (04) 478-488
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 36 Pires LAS, Teixeira AR, Leite TFO, Babinski MA, Chagas CAA. Morphometric aspects of the foramen magnum and the orbit in Brazilian dry skulls. Int J Med Res Health Sci 2016; 5: 34-42
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 37 Damiani D, Borelli NS, Melo HJF, Lima RS, Nobeschi L. Morphometry and spatial correlation of the foramen magnum and spinal cord through the magnetic resonance in normal young adults – anatomical and clinical aspects. J Morphol Sci 2012; 29: 87-90
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 38 Suazo GIC, Russo PP, Zavando MDA, Smith RL. Sexual dimorphism in the foramen magnum dimensions. Int J Morphol 2009; 27: 21-23
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 39 Espinoza EG, Ayala CP, Ortega LB, Collipal LE, Silva HM. Tomographic morphometry of the foramen magnum and its relation to sex and Mapuche ethnicity. Rev Anacem 2011; 5: 28-31
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 40 Isaza J, Díaz CA, Bedoya JF, Monsalve T, Botella MC. Assessment of sex from endocranial cavity using volume-rendered CT scans in a sample from Medellín, Colombia. Forensic Sci Int 2014; 234: 186.e1-186.e10
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 41 Wanebo JE, Chicoine MR. Quantitative analysis of the transcondylar approach to the foramen magnum. Neurosurgery 2001; 49 (04) 934-941 , discussion 941–943
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 42 Milhorat TH, Nishikawa M, Kula RW, Dlugacz YD. Mechanisms of cerebellar tonsil herniation in patients with Chiari malformations as guide to clinical management. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2010; 152 (07) 1117-1127
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 43 Catalina-Herrera CJ. Study of the anatomic metric values of the foramen magnum and its relation to sex. Acta Anat (Basel) 1987; 130 (04) 344-347
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 44 Macaluso Jr PJ. Metric sex determination from the basal region of the occipital bone in a documented French sample. Bull Mem Soc Anthropol Paris 2011; 23: 19-26
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 45 Gruber P, Henneberg M, Böni T, Rühli FJ. Variability of human foramen magnum size. Anat Rec (Hoboken) 2009; 292 (11) 1713-1719
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 46 Madadin M, Menezes RG, Al Saif HS. , et al. Morphometric evaluation of the foramen magnum for sex determination: A study from Saudi Arabia. J Forensic Leg Med 2017; 46: 66-71
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 47 Ukoha U, Egwu OA, Okafor IJ, Anyabolu AE, Ndukwe GU, Okpala I. Sexual dimorphism in the foramen magnum of Nigerian adult. Int J Biol Med Res 2011; 2: 878-881
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 48 Osunwoke EA, Oladipo GS, Gwunireama IU, Ngaokere JO. Morphometric analysis of the foramen magnum and jugular foramen in adult skulls in southern Nigerian population. Am J Sci Ind Res 2012; 3: 446-448
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 49 Radinsky L. Relative brain size: a new measure. Science 1967; 155 (3764): 836-838
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar