CC BY 4.0 · Aorta (Stamford) 2019; 07(02): 063-066
DOI: 10.1055/s-0039-1688439
Case Report
Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.

A Case of Type I Debranching Complicated by Anastomotic Pseudoaneurysm: Do Not Ask Too Much of the Ascending Aorta

Davide Carino
1   Department of Cardiac Surgery, Parma General Hospital, Parma, Italy
,
Alberto Molardi
1   Department of Cardiac Surgery, Parma General Hospital, Parma, Italy
,
Tiziano Gherli
1   Department of Cardiac Surgery, Parma General Hospital, Parma, Italy
,
Francesco Nicolini
1   Department of Cardiac Surgery, Parma General Hospital, Parma, Italy
,
Andrea Agostinelli
1   Department of Cardiac Surgery, Parma General Hospital, Parma, Italy
› Author Affiliations
Funding None.
Further Information

Publication History

03 October 2017

28 February 2019

Publication Date:
17 September 2019 (online)

Abstract

Treatment of aortic arch aneurysm with standard open surgery is technically demanding, and associated morbidity and mortality are not insignificant. In high-risk patients, hybrid procedures with debranching and reimplantation or bypass of the aortic arch vessel followed by thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) in the aortic arch represent a valid alternative to open surgery. However, when the ascending aorta is mildly dilated, the risk of retrograde dissection increases sharply. Here, we report a case of thoracic aortic aneurysm, with normal ascending aorta diameter, treated with Type I debranching and anterograde TEVAR complicated by anastomotic pseudoaneurysm and acute endocarditis, treated ultimately with ascending aortic repair and aortic valve replacement.

 
  • References

  • 1 Bavaria J, Vallabhajosyula P, Moeller P, Szeto W, Desai N, Pochettino A. Hybrid approaches in the treatment of aortic arch aneurysms: postoperative and midterm outcomes. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2013; 145 (3, Suppl): S85-S90
  • 2 Hiraoka A, Chikazawa G, Totsugawa T. , et al. Objective analysis of midterm outcomes of conventional and hybrid aortic arch repair by propensity-score matching. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2017; 154 (01) 100-106.e1
  • 3 Czerny M, Fleck T, Zimpfer D. , et al. Combined repair of an aortic arch aneurysm by sequential transposition of the supra-aortic branches and endovascular stent-graft placement. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2003; 126 (03) 916-918
  • 4 Makaloski V, Tsilimparis N, Rohlffs F, Heidemann F, Debus ES, Kölbel T. Endovascular total arch replacement techniques and early results. Ann Cardiothorac Surg 2018; 7 (03) 380-388
  • 5 Benrashid E, Wang H, Keenan JE. , et al. Evolving practice pattern changes and outcomes in the era of hybrid aortic arch repair. J Vasc Surg 2016; 63 (02) 323-331
  • 6 Czerny M, Weigang E, Sodeck G. , et al. Targeting landing zone 0 by total arch rerouting and TEVAR: midterm results of a transcontinental registry. Ann Thorac Surg 2012; 94 (01) 84-89
  • 7 Lasheras JC. The biomechanics of arterial aneurysms. Annu Rev Fluid Mech 2007; 39 (01) 293-319
  • 8 Hirotsu K, Suh G-Y, Lee JT, Dake MD, Fleischmann D, Cheng CP. Changes in geometry and cardiac deformation of the thoracic aorta after thoracic endovascular aortic repair. Ann Vasc Surg 2018; 46: 83-89
  • 9 Preventza O, Bakaeen FG, Cervera RD, Coselli JS. Deployment of proximal thoracic endograft in zone 0 of the ascending aorta: treatment options and early outcomes for aortic arch aneurysms in a high-risk population. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2013; 44 (03) 446-452 , discussion 452–453
  • 10 Gelpi G, Vanelli P, Mangini A, Danna P, Contino M, Antona C. Hybrid aortic arch repair procedure: reinforcement of the aorta for a safe and durable landing zone. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2010; 40 (06) 709-714