Download PDF
CC BY 4.0 · Aorta (Stamford) 2019; 07(02): 049-055
DOI: 10.1055/s-0039-1687854
Original Research Article
Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.

The Florida Sleeve Procedure Is Durable and Improves Aortic Valve Function

Seyed Hossein Aalaei-Andabili
1   Division of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida
2   Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida
,
Tomas D. Martin
1   Division of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida
,
Philip J. Hess
3   Division of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, Indiana University, Indianapolis, Indiana
,
Ashkan Karimi
2   Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida
,
Anthony A. Bavry
2   Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida
4   North Florida/South Georgia Veterans Health System, Gainesville, Florida
,
George J. Arnaoutakis
1   Division of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida
,
Thomas M. Beaver
1   Division of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida
› Author Affiliations Funding None.
Further Information

Publication History

07 July 2018

22 February 2019

Publication Date:
17 September 2019 (online)

   Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Background The Florida (FL) Sleeve procedure was introduced as a simplified approach for valve-sparing correction of functional Type I aortic insufficiency (AI) associated with aortic root aneurysms. In this study, short- and long-term outcomes after the FL Sleeve procedure were investigated.

Methods From May 2002 to January 2016, 177 patients underwent the FL Sleeve procedure. Left ventricular end-diastolic diameter (LVEDD), left ventricular end-systolic diameter, left ventricular ejection fraction, and degree of AI (none = 0, minimal = 1, mild = 2, moderate = 3, severe = 4) were evaluated by echocardiography.

Results Mean ± standard deviation of age was 49.41 ± 15.37 years. Survival rate was 98% at 1 year, 97% at 5 years, and 93% at 8 years. Freedom from reoperation was 99% at 1 year and 98% at 2 to 8 years. Three patients (1.69%) died during hospitalization. Three patients (1.69%) developed periprocedural stroke. Postoperative follow-up echocardiography was available in 140 patients at 30 days, and 31 patients at 5 years. AI grade significantly improved from baseline at 30 days (2.18 ± 1.26 vs. 1.1 ± 0.93, p < 0.001) and at 5 years (2.0 ± 1.23 vs. 1.45 ± 0.88, p = 0.04). Preoperative mean LVEDD significantly decreased from 52.20 ± 6.73 to 46.87 ± 8.40 (p < 0.001) at 30 days, and from 53.22 ± 7.07 to 46.61 ± 10.51 (p = 0.01) at 5 years.

Conclusions The FL Sleeve procedure is a safe, effective, and durable treatment of aortic root aneurysm and Type I AI. Long-term survival and freedom from reoperation rates are encouraging.

Keywords

Florida Sleeve - safety - aortic insufficiency - freedom from reoperation

Note

The study was presented at the 53th annual meeting of Society of Thoracic Surgeon (STS), January 21–25, 2017, Houston, TX, USA.


 

  • References

  • 1 Etz CD, Bischoff MS, Bodian C. , et al. The Bentall procedure: is it the gold standard? A series of 597 consecutive cases. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2010; 140 (6, Suppl): S64-S70 , discussion S86–S91
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Ouzounian M, Rao V, Manlhiot C. , et al. Valve-sparing root replacement compared with composite valve graft procedures in patients with aortic root dilation. J Am Coll Cardiol 2016; 68 (17) 1838-1847
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 David TE, Feindel CM. An aortic valve-sparing operation for patients with aortic incompetence and aneurysm of the ascending aorta. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1992; 103 (04) 617-621 , discussion 622
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Yacoub MH, Gehle P, Chandrasekaran V, Birks EJ, Child A, Radley-Smith R. Late results of a valve-preserving operation in patients with aneurysms of the ascending aorta and root. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1998; 115 (05) 1080-1090
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Leontyev S, Trommer C, Subramanian S. , et al. The outcome after aortic valve-sparing (David) operation in 179 patients: a single-centre experience. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2012; 42 (02) 261-266 , discussion 266–267
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 David TE, Maganti M, Armstrong S. Aortic root aneurysm: principles of repair and long-term follow-up. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2010; 140 (6, Suppl): S14-S19 , discussion S45–S51
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Stamou SC, Williams ML, Gunn TM, Hagberg RC, Lobdell KW, Kouchoukos NT. Aortic root surgery in the United States: a report from the Society of Thoracic Surgeons database. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2015; 149 (01) 116-22.e4
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Hess Jr PJ, Klodell CT, Beaver TM, Martin TD. The Florida sleeve: a new technique for aortic root remodeling with preservation of the aortic valve and sinuses. Ann Thorac Surg 2005; 80 (02) 748-750
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Hess Jr PJ, Harman PK, Klodell CT. , et al. Early outcomes using the Florida sleeve repair for correction of aortic insufficiency due to root aneurysms. Ann Thorac Surg 2009; 87 (04) 1161-1168 , discussion 1168–1169
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Tasca G, Selmi M, Votta E. , et al. Aortic root biomechanics after Sleeve and David sparing techniques: a finite element analysis. Ann Thorac Surg 2017; 103 (05) 1451-1459
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Gamba A, Tasca G, Giannico F. , et al. Early and medium term results of the sleeve valve-sparing procedure for aortic root ectasia. Ann Thorac Surg 2015; 99 (04) 1228-1233
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Shrestha M, Baraki H, Maeding I. , et al. Long-term results after aortic valve-sparing operation (David I). Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2012; 41 (01) 56-61 , discussion 61–62
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 David TE, Armstrong S, Ivanov J, Feindel CM, Omran A, Webb G. Results of aortic valve-sparing operations. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2001; 122 (01) 39-46
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Coselli JS, Hughes MS, Green SY. , et al. Valve-sparing aortic root replacement: early and midterm outcomes in 83 patients. Ann Thorac Surg 2014; 97 (04) 1267-1273 , discussion 1273–1274
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Esaki J, Leshnower BG, Binongo JN. , et al. Clinical outcomes of the David V valve-sparing root replacement compared with bioprosthetic valve-conduits for aortic root aneurysms. Ann Thorac Surg 2017; 103 (06) 1824-1832
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Leshnower BG, Guyton RA, Myung RJ. , et al. Expanding the indications for the David V aortic root replacement: early results. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2012; 143 (04) 879-884
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Leshnower BG, Myung RJ, McPherson L, Chen EP. Midterm results of David V valve-sparing aortic root replacement in acute type A aortic dissection. Ann Thorac Surg 2015; 99 (03) 795-800 , discussion 800–801
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Leyh RG, Fischer S, Kallenbach K. , et al. High failure rate after valve-sparing aortic root replacement using the “remodeling technique” in acute type A aortic dissection. Circulation 2002; 106 (12) (Suppl. 01) I229-I233
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Kvitting JP, Kari FA, Fischbein MP. , et al. David valve-sparing aortic root replacement: equivalent mid-term outcome for different valve types with or without connective tissue disorder. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2013; 145 (01) 117-126 , 127.e1–127.e5, discussion 126–127
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 David TE, Ivanov J, Armstrong S, Feindel CM, Webb GD. Aortic valve-sparing operations in patients with aneurysms of the aortic root or ascending aorta. Ann Thorac Surg 2002; 74 (05) S1758-S1761 , discussion S1792–S1799
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Liebrich M, Kruszynski MK, Roser D. , et al. The David procedure in different valve pathologies: a single-center experience in 236 patients. Ann Thorac Surg 2013; 95 (01) 71-76
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 David TE, Armstrong S, Manlhiot C, McCrindle BW, Feindel CM. Long-term results of aortic root repair using the reimplantation technique. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2013; 145 (3, Suppl): S22-S25
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Kari FA, Doll KN, Hemmer W. , et al. Survival and freedom from aortic valve-related reoperation after valve-sparing aortic root replacement in 1015 patients. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg 2016; 22 (04) 431-438
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 David TE, David CM, Manlhiot C, Colman J, Crean AM, Bradley T. Outcomes of aortic valve-sparing operations in Marfan syndrome. J Am Coll Cardiol 2015; 66 (13) 1445-1453
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Aalaei-Andabili SH, Martin T, Hess P. , et al. Florida Sleeve procedure is durable and improves aortic valve function in Marfan syndrome patients. Ann Thorac Surg 2017; 104 (03) 834-839
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Coselli JS, Volguina IV, LeMaire SA. , et al; Aortic Valve Operative Outcomes in Marfan Patients Study Group. Early and 1-year outcomes of aortic root surgery in patients with Marfan syndrome: a prospective, multicenter, comparative study. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2014; 147 (06) 1758-1766 , 1767.e1–1767.e4
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar