Dissection Course in Anatomy as Stimulus to Independent Research and to a Real Step into Medicine

Abstract

Objectives In the recent years, many strategies in anatomy education have appeared. However, these innovations reduce the time students can spend on cadaver-based classes, which are considered to be an effective method of learning anatomy. The aim of the present research was to observe the advantages and features of dissection sessions in medical universities.

Materials and Methods The comparative analysis of the academic performance of dissector (n = 30) and nondissector (n = 105) students and a survey questionnaire were conducted. The data was collected through the work of the Dissection Mastery School (DMS) of the Sechenov University, Moscow, Russia, between 2016 and 2018.

Results The data analysis showed significant higher examination results in the dissectors cohort (p < 0.001) and a strong opinion about dissection as a good tool to improve anatomy knowledge (95% of responders). Apart from that, prosection is proven to have advantages in comparison with alternative learning approaches, according to researches performed by colleagues.

Conclusion These data show that dissection still remains one of the most effective and beneficial methods of teaching anatomy in medical universities, and that it should be further integrated into the medical curriculum.

Keywords

anatomy - cross-sectional anatomy - dissection - medical education - methodology

• References

• 1 Ferngren G. Vivisection Ancient and Modern. Hist Med 2017; 4 (03) 243-254
• 2 Izutkin DA. History of forming fundamentals of scientific anatomy. Medicinskij al'manah 2017; (02) 38-41
• 3 Ivanenko GA, Kuznetsov AV. Teaching of human anatomy in medical university: problems and prospects. Journal of Anatomy and Histopathology. 2017; 6 (05) 16
• 4 Kuznecova MA, Miroshkin DV, Chilingaridi SN. Methodological approaches to the teaching of human anatomy in modern conditions. Morphology 2017; 151 (03) 79-80 (In Russian)
• 5 Winkelmann A. Anatomical dissection as a teaching method in medical school: a review of the evidence. Med Educ 2007; 41 (01) 15-22
• 6 Borovleva OV, Martynchuk DV, CHerdanceva DD, Batuhtina NP, Efremova VP, Sindeeva LV. Classic and innovative methods in the educational-research work of students studying the discipline «human anatomy. Modern issues of science and education 2015; (05) 190 . (In Russian) Classic and innovative methods in the educational-research work of students studying the discipline «human anatomy
• 7 Nikolenko VN, Oganesyan MV, Kudryashova VA, Rizaeva NA, Shumak AV. What can bring teaching of anatomy to the requirements (needs) of medical practice?. Modern issues of science and education 2017; (03) 65-70
• 8 Griksaitis MJ, Sawdon MA, Finn GM. Ultrasound and cadaveric prosections as methods for teaching cardiac anatomy: a comparative study. Anat Sci Educ 2012; 5 (01) 20-26
• 9 Ghosh SK. Human cadaveric dissection: a historical account from ancient Greece to the modern era. Anat Cell Biol 2015; 48 (03) 153-169
• 10 Larkin TA, McAndrew DJ. Factors influencing students' decisions to participate in a short “dissection experience” within a systemic anatomy course. Anat Sci Educ 2013; 6 (04) 225-231
• 11 Entwistle N, Tait H. Approaches to studying and perceptions of the learning environment across disciplines. New Dir Teach Learn 1995; ;•••: 93-103
• 12 Pandey P, Zimitat C. Medical students' learning of anatomy: memorisation, understanding and visualisation. Med Educ 2007; 41 (01) 7-14
• 13 Yeager VL. Learning gross anatomy: dissection and prosection. Clin Anat 1996; 9 (01) 57-59
• 14 Crisp AH. The relevance of anatomy and morbid anatomy for medical practice and hence for postgraduate and continuing medical education of doctors. Postgrad Med J 1989; 65 (762) 221-223
• 15 Bertman SL, Marks Jr SC. Humanities in medical education: rationale and resources for the dissection laboratory. Med Educ 1985; 19 (05) 374-381
• 16 Marks Jr SC, Bertman SL, Penney JC. Human anatomy: a foundation for education about death and dying in medicine. Clin Anat 1997; 10 (02) 118-122
• 17 Ellis H. Teaching in the dissecting room. Clin Anat 2001; 14 (02) 149-151
• 18 Sheikh AH, Barry DS, Gutierrez H, Cryan JF, O'Keeffe GW. Cadaveric anatomy in the future of medical education: What is the surgeons view?. Anat Sci Educ 2016; 9 (02) 203-208
• 19 Bouwer HE, Valter K, Webb AL. Current integration of dissection in medical education in Australia and New Zealand: Challenges and successes. Anat Sci Educ 2016; 9 (02) 161-170
• 20 Whelan A, Leddy JJ, Ramnanan CJ. Benefits of extracurricular participation in dissection in a prosection-based medical anatomy program. Anat Sci Educ 2018; 11 (03) 294-302
• 21 Estai M, Bunt S. Best teaching practices in anatomy education: A critical review. Ann Anat 2016; 208: 151-157
• 22 Van Wyk J, Rennie CO. Learning Anatomy Through Dissection: Perceptions of a Diverse Medical Student Cohort. Int J Morphol 2015; 33 (01) 89-95
• 23 Burgess A, Ramsey-Stewart G. Elective anatomy by whole body dissection course: what motivates students?. BMC Med Educ 2014; 14: 272