Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2021; 69(02): 117-123
DOI: 10.1055/s-0039-1683955
Original Cardiovascular

Influence of Left Atrial Appendage Amputation on Natriuretic Peptides—A Randomized Controlled Trial

Philippe Grieshaber*
1   Department of Adult and Pediatric Cardiovascular Surgery, Giessen University Hospital, Giessen, Germany
,
Borros Arneth*
2   Institute for Laboratory Medicine and Pathobiochemistry, Giessen University Hospital, Giessen, Germany
,
Ferdinand Steinsberger
1   Department of Adult and Pediatric Cardiovascular Surgery, Giessen University Hospital, Giessen, Germany
,
Bernd Niemann
1   Department of Adult and Pediatric Cardiovascular Surgery, Giessen University Hospital, Giessen, Germany
,
Irina Oswald
1   Department of Adult and Pediatric Cardiovascular Surgery, Giessen University Hospital, Giessen, Germany
,
Harald Renz
2   Institute for Laboratory Medicine and Pathobiochemistry, Giessen University Hospital, Giessen, Germany
,
Andreas Böning
1   Department of Adult and Pediatric Cardiovascular Surgery, Giessen University Hospital, Giessen, Germany
› Institutsangaben
Funding This is an investigator-initiated study without external funding.

Abstract

Background Closure or amputation of the left atrial appendage (LAA) is a common therapy for atrial fibrillation (AF). As the LAA is a hormone-producing organ, however, amputation is still somewhat controversial. We examined patients after surgical AF therapy with or without LAA amputation to determine the influence of LAA amputation on pro-atrial natriuretic peptide (proANP) and B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) plasma levels and on clinical severity of heart failure.

Methods Twenty-one consecutive patients were prospectively randomized to either undergo LAA amputation (n = 10) or no LAA amputation (n = 11) between 05/2015 and 10/2015. All patients underwent coronary and/or valve surgery and concomitant AF surgery with either cryoablation (n = 3) or radio frequency ablation (n = 17). ProANP and BNP levels were measured preoperatively and until 800 days postoperatively.

Results Baseline proANP values were comparable between the groups (without LAA amputation: 4.2 ± 2.1 nmol/L, with LAA amputation: 5.6 ± 3.6 nmol/L). Postoperatively, proANP levels rose markedly in both groups. Even after LAA amputation, proANP levels remained elevated for 7 days postoperatively but fell to baseline levels at day 31 and remained on baseline level at 800 days postoperatively. ProANP levels in the LAA amputation group (5.8–9.7 nmol/L) were not significantly lower than in the group without LAA amputation (9.2–14.1 nmol/L; p = 0.357). BNP levels also rose after surgery in both groups until day 7. At 800 days after surgery, BNP levels were back at baseline levels in both groups. Clinical follow-up at 2 years postoperatively showed no difference in heart failure symptoms or need for heart failure medication between the groups.

Conclusion In contrast to commonly held beliefs about the endocrine and reservoir functions of the LAA, there seems to be no clinically relevant detrimental effect of LAA amputation on natriuretic peptide levels and severity of heart failure until up to 2 years postoperatively.

Ethics Approval and Consent to Participate

The study was approved by the ethical committee of the Faculty of Medicine at Justus Liebig University Giessen, Germany. The trial was designed and conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. Patients gave informed consent for study participation prior to enrollment.


* Both authors contributed equally to this work.




Publikationsverlauf

Eingereicht: 21. November 2018

Angenommen: 13. Februar 2019

Artikel online veröffentlicht:
31. März 2019

© 2019. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany

 
  • References

  • 1 Johnson WD, Ganjoo AK, Stone CD, Srivyas RC, Howard M. The left atrial appendage: our most lethal human attachment! Surgical implications. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2000; 17 (06) 718-722
  • 2 Lall SC, Melby SJ, Voeller RK. et al. The effect of ablation technology on surgical outcomes after the Cox-maze procedure: a propensity analysis. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2007; 133 (02) 389-396
  • 3 Holmes DR, Reddy VY, Turi ZG. et al; PROTECT AF Investigators. Percutaneous closure of the left atrial appendage versus warfarin therapy for prevention of stroke in patients with atrial fibrillation: a randomised non-inferiority trial. Lancet 2009; 374 (9689): 534-542
  • 4 Kanderian AS, Gillinov AM, Pettersson GB, Blackstone E, Klein AL. Success of surgical left atrial appendage closure: assessment by transesophageal echocardiography. J Am Coll Cardiol 2008; 52 (11) 924-929
  • 5 Katz ES, Tsiamtsiouris T, Applebaum RM, Schwartzbard A, Tunick PA, Kronzon I. Surgical left atrial appendage ligation is frequently incomplete: a transesophageal echocardiographic study. J Am Coll Cardiol 2000; 36 (02) 468-471
  • 6 García-Fernández MA, Pérez-David E, Quiles J. et al. Role of left atrial appendage obliteration in stroke reduction in patients with mitral valve prosthesis: a transesophageal echocardiographic study. J Am Coll Cardiol 2003; 42 (07) 1253-1258
  • 7 Damiano Jr RJ. What is the best way to surgically eliminate the left atrial appendage?. J Am Coll Cardiol 2008; 52 (11) 930-931
  • 8 Roth P, Rahimi A, Boening A. The pericardium-reinforced technique of amputation of the left atrial appendage: quick, safe, and simple. Ann Thorac Surg 2010; 90 (01) e11-e13
  • 9 Kamohara K, Popović ZB, Daimon M. et al. Impact of left atrial appendage exclusion on left atrial function. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2007; 133 (01) 174-181
  • 10 Tabata T, Oki T, Yamada H. et al. Role of left atrial appendage in left atrial reservoir function as evaluated by left atrial appendage clamping during cardiac surgery. Am J Cardiol 1998; 81 (03) 327-332
  • 11 Stöllberger C, Schneider B, Finsterer J, Crystal E. Benefits of left atrial appendage occlusion for stroke prevention. Am Heart J 2006; 151 (06) e1 , author reply e3
  • 12 Stöllberger C, Schneider B, Finsterer J. Is left atrial appendage occlusion during routine coronary artery bypass graft surgery useful for stroke prevention?. Am Heart J 2003; 146 (06) E26
  • 13 Miyairi T, Nakao M, Kigawa I. et al. A closed biatrial procedure using bipolar radiofrequency ablation. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2006; 132 (01) 168-169
  • 14 Brueckmann M, Bertsch T, Hoffmann U. et al. N-terminal pro-atrial natriuretic peptide as a biochemical marker of long-term interventional success after radiofrequency catheter ablation of paroxysmal supraventricular tachyarrhythmias. Clin Chem Lab Med 2004; 42 (08) 896-902
  • 15 Jiang H, Wang W, Wang C, Xie X, Hou Y. Association of pre-ablation level of potential blood markers with atrial fibrillation recurrence after catheter ablation: a meta-analysis. Europace 2016; 7: euw088
  • 16 Pillarisetti J, Reddy N, Biria M. et al. Elevated brain natriuretic peptide level in patients undergoing atrial fibrillation ablation: is it a predictor of failed ablation or a mere function of atrial rhythm and rate at a point in time?. J Interv Card Electrophysiol 2014; 40 (02) 161-168
  • 17 Seiler J, Steven D, Roberts-Thomson KC. et al. The effect of open-irrigated radiofrequency catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation on left atrial pressure and B-type natriuretic peptide. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 2014; 37 (05) 616-623
  • 18 Berendes E, Schmidt C, Van Aken H. et al. A-type and B-type natriuretic peptides in cardiac surgical procedures. Anesth Analg 2004; 98 (01) 11-19 table of contents.
  • 19 Dunning J, Nagendran M, Alfieri OR. et al; EACTS Clinical Guidelines Committee. Guideline for the surgical treatment of atrial fibrillation. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2013; 44 (05) 777-791
  • 20 Ad N, Henry L, Hunt S. The impact of surgical ablation in patients with low ejection fraction, heart failure, and atrial fibrillation. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2011; 40 (01) 70-76
  • 21 Whitlock R, Healey J, Vincent J. et al. Rationale and design of the Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion Study (LAAOS) III. Ann Cardiothorac Surg 2014; 3 (01) 45-54