Facial Plast Surg 2019; 35(02): 210-213
DOI: 10.1055/s-0039-1683858
Original Research
Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.

Avoiding the Unhappy Patient by Building Rapport in the Internet Age

Eugene Kern
1   Department of Otorhinolaryngology, University at Buffalo - The State University of New York, Buffalo, New York
,
Oren Friedman
2   Department of Otorhinolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
15 March 2019 (online)

Abstract

The dynamics of the doctor–patient relationship has been complicated as more patients seem to expect perfection in this age of selfies and Internet postings. The preoperative patient interview is critical to recognize both body language clues and subtle but apparent red flags to avoid rhinoplasty on potentially unhappy patients. This interview should include routine use of a body dysmorphic disorder screening questionnaire since legions of these patients are undiagnosed prior to surgery and few, if any, are ever satisfied with even an excellent surgical result. These patients need diagnosis and psychological intervention—not surgery. Rapport is critical to patient and surgeon's satisfaction; therefore, it is valuable to practice the ABC's of rapport building: 1) active listening, (2) positive body language, and (3) candor.

 
  • References

  • 1 Plastic Surgery Statistics Report 2017. www.ASPS.org . Cosmetic Surgery National Data Bank statistics
  • 2 Montgomery KC, Chester J, Milosevic T. Children's privacy in the big data era: research opportunities. Pediatrics 2017; 140 (Suppl. 02) S117-S121
  • 3 Weingarden H, Renshaw KD. Body Dysmorphic symptoms, functional impairment, and depression: the role of appearance-based teasing. J Psychol 2016; 150 (01) 119-131
  • 4 Kern EB. The preoperative discussion as a prelude to managing a complication. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2003; 129 (11) 1163-1165
  • 5 Ambady N, Laplante D, Nguyen T, Rosenthal R, Chaumeton N, Levinson W. Surgeons' tone of voice: a clue to malpractice history. Surgery 2002; 132 (01) 5-9
  • 6 Sarwer DB. Awareness and identification of body dysmorphic disorder by aesthetic surgeons: results of a survey of American Society for Aesthetic Plastic Surgery members. Aesthet Surg J 2002; 22 (06) 531-535
  • 7 Picavet VA, Prokopakis EP, Gabriëls L, Jorissen M, Hellings PW. High prevalence of body dysmorphic disorder symptoms in patients seeking rhinoplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg 2011; 128 (02) 509-517
  • 8 Phillips KA. The Broken Mirror: Understanding and Treating Body Dysmorphic Disorder. Revised and Expanded Edition. Oxford (England): Oxford University Press; 2005
  • 9 Phillips KA. Body Dysmorphic Disorder: Advances in Research and Clinical Practice. Oxford (England): Oxford University Press; 2017
  • 10 Phillips KA. Lecture presented at International Master Course on Aging Science (IMCAS), Palais des Congres, Paris, France, February 1–3, 2018
  • 11 Phillips KA, Hollander E. Treating body dysmorphic disorder with medication: evidence, misconceptions, and a suggested approach. Body Image 2008; 5 (01) 13-27
  • 12 Dufresne RG, Phillips KA, Vittorio CC, Wilkel CS. A screening questionnaire for body dysmorphic disorder in a cosmetic dermatologic surgery practice. Dermatol Surg 2001; 27 (05) 457-462
  • 13 Lekakis G, Picavet VA, Gabriëls L, Grietens J, Hellings PW. Body dysmorphic disorder in aesthetic rhinoplasty: validating a new screening tool. Laryngoscope 2016; 126 (08) 1739-1745
  • 14 Vuyk HD, Zijlker TD. Psychosocial aspects of patient counseling and selection: a surgeon's perspective. Facial Plast Surg 1995; 11 (02) 55-60
  • 15 Constantian MB. Childhood Abuse, Body Shame and Addictive Plastic Surgery: The Face of Trauma. New York, NY: Routledge; 2019
  • 16 Beckman HB, Markakis KM, Suchman AL, Frankel RM. The doctor-patient relationship and malpractice. Lessons from plaintiff depositions. Arch Intern Med 1994; 154 (12) 1365-1370