Facial Plast Surg 2019; 35(02): 121-128
DOI: 10.1055/s-0039-1683857
Original Article
Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.

The Rejuvenation of the Aged Central Lower Face: A Contemporary Perspective

Fred G. Fedok
1   Department of Surgery, University of South Alabama, Mobile, Alabama
› Author Affiliations
Funding The author has no relevant financial disclosures regarding this manuscript.
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
03 April 2019 (online)

Abstract

Aging of the central face is typified by several common characteristics such as generalized volume loss, the appearance of a mental crease and marionette lines, thinning of the lips, and fixed and dynamic rhytids. These result from several processes such as atrophy of adipose and bone, changes in the support of the mandibular septum, and a loss of skin elasticity. There are many methods available for the improvement and rejuvenation of this facial anatomical area. Options include traditional surgical techniques, the application of volume and the use of laser, light, and energy-based devices. The recent application of biological interventions offers the possibility of cellular-based therapies to usher in a new era of true tissue regeneration. Optimal correction of the abnormalities may be accomplished through an understanding and identification of the causes of the observed abnormalities and targeting with the best available intervention. There are a growing number of techniques and technologies to accomplish this.

 
  • References

  • 1 Cacioppo JT, Cacioppo S. The population-based longitudinal Chicago Health, Aging, and Social Relations Study (CHASRS): study description and predictors of attrition in older adults. Arch Sci Psychol 2018; 6 (01) 21-31
  • 2 Vogelsang EM, Raymo JM, Liang J, Kobayashi E, Fukaya T. Population aging and health trajectories at older ages. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci 2017 (e-pub ahead of print). doi:10.1093/geronb/gbx071
  • 3 Rohrich RJ, Pessa JE. The anatomy and clinical implications of perioral submuscular fat. Plast Reconstr Surg 2009; 124 (01) 266-271
  • 4 Perkins SW, Sandel IV HD. Anatomic considerations, analysis, and the aging process of the perioral region. Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am 2007; 15 (04) 403-407 , v v .
  • 5 Ridley MV. . SM. Aesthetic facial proportions. In: Papel ID. , ed. Facial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery. 3rd ed. New York, NY: Thieme; 2009: 119-113
  • 6 Reece EM, Pessa JE, Rohrich RJ. The mandibular septum: anatomical observations of the jowls in aging-implications for facial rejuvenation. Plast Reconstr Surg 2008; 121 (04) 1414-1420
  • 7 Braz A, Humphrey S, Weinkle S. , et al. Lower face: clinical anatomy and regional approaches with injectable fillers. Plast Reconstr Surg 2015; 136 (5, Suppl): 235S-257S
  • 8 Romo T, Yalamanchili H, Sclafani AP. Chin and prejowl augmentation in the management of the aging jawline. Facial Plast Surg 2005; 21 (01) 38-46
  • 9 Taub AF, Pham K. Stem cells in dermatology and anti-aging care of the skin. Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am 2018; 26 (04) 425-437
  • 10 Lin J, Sclafani AP. Platelet-rich plasma for skin rejuvenation and tissue fill. Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am 2018; 26 (04) 439-446
  • 11 Fedok FG, Mittelman H. Augmenting the prejowl: deciding between fat, fillers, and implants. Facial Plast Surg 2016; 32 (05) 513-519
  • 12 Ransom ER, Antunes MB, Bloom JD, Greco T. Concurrent structural fat grafting and carbon dioxide laser resurfacing for perioral and lower face rejuvenation. J Cosmet Laser Ther 2011; 13 (01) 6-12
  • 13 Sykes JM, Tapias V, Pu LL. Autologous fat grafting viability: lower third of the face. Facial Plast Surg 2010; 26 (05) 376-384
  • 14 Glasgold M, Lam SM, Glasgold R. Autologous fat grafting for cosmetic enhancement of the perioral region. Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am 2007; 15 (04) 461-470 , vi
  • 15 Xu P, Yu Q, Huang H, Zhang WJ, Li W. Nanofat increases dermis thickness and neovascularization in photoaged nude mouse skin. Aesthetic Plast Surg 2018; 42 (02) 343-351
  • 16 Uyulmaz S, Sanchez Macedo N, Rezaeian F, Giovanoli P, Lindenblatt N. Nanofat grafting for scar treatment and skin quality improvement. Aesthet Surg J 2018; 38 (04) 421-428
  • 17 Jan SN, Bashir MM, Khan FA. , et al. Unfiltered nanofat injections rejuvenate postburn scars of face. Ann Plast Surg 2019; 82 (01) 28-33
  • 18 Gu Z, Li Y, Li H. Use of condensed nanofat combined with fat grafts to treat atrophic scars. JAMA Facial Plast Surg 2018; 20 (02) 128-135
  • 19 Bi HS, Zhang C, Nie FF, Pan BL, Xiao E. Basic and clinical evidence of an alternative method to produce vivo nanofat. Chin Med J (Engl) 2018; 131 (05) 588-593
  • 20 Lo Furno D, Tamburino S, Mannino G. , et al. Nanofat 2.0: experimental evidence for a fat grafting rich in mesenchymal stem cells. Physiol Res 2017; 66 (04) 663-671
  • 21 Tonnard P, Verpaele A, Peeters G, Hamdi M, Cornelissen M, Declercq H. Nanofat grafting: basic research and clinical applications. Plast Reconstr Surg 2013; 132 (04) 1017-1026
  • 22 Ibrahim MK, Ibrahim SM, Salem AM. Skin microneedling plus platelet-rich plasma versus skin microneedling alone in the treatment of atrophic post acne scars: a split face comparative study. J Dermatolog Treat 2018; 29 (03) 281-286
  • 23 Alexander RW. Biocellular regenerative medicine: use of adipose-derived stem/stromal cells and it's native bioactive matrix. Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am 2016; 27 (04) 871-891
  • 24 Asif M, Kanodia S, Singh K. Combined autologous platelet-rich plasma with microneedling verses microneedling with distilled water in the treatment of atrophic acne scars: a concurrent split-face study. J Cosmet Dermatol 2016; 15 (04) 434-443
  • 25 El-Domyati M, Abdel-Wahab H, Hossam A. Microneedling combined with platelet-rich plasma or trichloroacetic acid peeling for management of acne scarring: a split-face clinical and histologic comparison. J Cosmet Dermatol 2018; 17 (01) 73-83
  • 26 Faghihi G, Keyvan S, Asilian A, Nouraei S, Behfar S, Nilforoushzadeh MA. Efficacy of autologous platelet-rich plasma combined with fractional ablative carbon dioxide resurfacing laser in treatment of facial atrophic acne scars: a split-face randomized clinical trial. Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol 2016; 82 (02) 162-168
  • 27 Leheta T, El Garem Y, Hegazy R, Abdel Hay RM, Abdel Halim D. Non-ablative 1540 fractional laser: how far could it help injection lipolysis and dermal fillers in lower-face rejuvenation? A randomized controlled trial. J Cosmet Laser Ther 2013; 15 (01) 13-20
  • 28 Hamra ST. Commentary on: total composite flap facelift and the deep-plane transition zone: a critical consideration in SMAS-release midface lifting. Aesthet Surg J 2016; 36 (05) 546-549
  • 29 Jacono AA, Bryant LM, Ahmedli NN. A novel extended deep plane facelift technique for jawline rejuvenation and volumization. Aesthet Surg J 2018; ;(Nov): 12
  • 30 Wulu JA, Spiegel JH. Is deep plane rhytidectomy superior to superficial musculoaponeurotic system plication facelift?. Laryngoscope 2018; 128 (08) 1741-1742
  • 31 Maloney BP, Truswell IV W, Waldman SR. Lip augmentation: discussion and debate. Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am 2012; 20 (03) 327-346
  • 32 Spiegel JH. The modified bullhorn approach for the lip-lift. JAMA Facial Plast Surg 2018; ;(Aug): 23