Facial Plast Surg 2019; 35(02): 204-209
DOI: 10.1055/s-0039-1681071
Original Research
Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.

Public Perception of Facial Fillers

Houmehr Hojjat
1   Department of Otolaryngology – Head and Neck Surgery, Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, Michigan
,
Richard Raad
1   Department of Otolaryngology – Head and Neck Surgery, Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, Michigan
,
Jordyn Lucas
1   Department of Otolaryngology – Head and Neck Surgery, Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, Michigan
,
Mohammad Mir
1   Department of Otolaryngology – Head and Neck Surgery, Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, Michigan
,
Brendan C. Smith
2   Department of Otolaryngology – Head and Neck Surgery, Rutgers New Jersey Medical School, Newark, New Jersey
,
Michael A. Carron
1   Department of Otolaryngology – Head and Neck Surgery, Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, Michigan
3   Division of Facial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, Michigan
,
Giancarlo Zuliani
1   Department of Otolaryngology – Head and Neck Surgery, Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, Michigan
4   Zuliani Facial Aesthetics, Bloomfield Hills, Michigan
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
08 March 2019 (online)

Abstract

There has been widespread coverage of cosmetic procedures, particularly facial fillers, as minimally invasive options for facial rejuvenation. The authors' objective was to characterize news media's coverage of facial fillers and its role in shaping public perception of these products over the past decade. Public view plays a significant role in policymaking, assisting patient communication, and addressing preconceived notions. Google News was searched for online news coverage related to “facial fillers” from 2008 to 2017. News articles from various sources were reviewed and analyzed with multiple objectives including complications listed, advantages, disadvantages, physician specialties, overall theme of the articles as positive, negative, or neutral and other parametrics. A chi-square test was used for statistical analysis. Of 426 articles meeting inclusion criteria, international news (20.4%), tabloids (18.8%), online health sites (18.3%), and national news (16.9%) were represented. Of articles containing adequate information, coverage was 44.7% positive, 29.9% neutral, and 26.1% negative with no significant change from 2008 to 2017. In addition, 46.0% of papers discussed complications including vascular injury and blindness associated with fillers, with significant increase by 2017 (p < 0.05). Facial fillers media coverage was overall positive, with broad coverage at both national and international levels. Complications were discussed often, and although vascular injury and vision damage are rare complications of fillers, they were frequently cited, potentially leading the public to believe they occur frequently. There were also significant concerns in the news media about greater regulation of products used as facial fillers, and practitioners administrating them. Altogether, these findings provide a comprehensive overview of patient perception and expectations of an increasingly popular and expanding cosmetic procedure.

 
  • References

  • 1 American Society of Plastic Surgeons. Plastic surgery statistics report. American Society of Plastic Surgeons National Clearinghouse; 2018
  • 2 Bass LS. Injectable filler techniques for facial rejuvenation, volumization, and augmentation. Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am 2015; 23 (04) 479-488
  • 3 Monheit GD, Coleman KM. Hyaluronic acid fillers. Dermatol Ther 2006; 19 (03) 141-150
  • 4 Philipp-Dormston WG. [Hyaluronic acid fillers in dermatology]. Hautarzt 2018; 69 (06) 491-509
  • 5 Kontis TC. Contemporary review of injectable facial fillers. JAMA Facial Plast Surg 2013; 15 (01) 58-64
  • 6 Ward B, Ward M, Paskhover B. Google trends as a resource for informing plastic surgery marketing decisions. Aesthetic Plast Surg 2018; 42 (02) 598-602
  • 7 Fox S, Rainie L. Vital decisions: how internet users decide what information to trust when they or their loved ones are sick. Pew Internet & American Life Project; 2002
  • 8 Dasgupta N, Mandl KD, Brownstein JS. Breaking the news or fueling the epidemic? Temporal association between news media report volume and opioid-related mortality. PLoS One 2009; 4 (11) e7758
  • 9 About Google News. Google; 2013
  • 10 Stone BV, Forde JC, Levit VB, Lee RK, Te AE, Chughtai B. Trends in internet search activity, media coverage, and patient-centered health information after the FDA safety communications on surgical mesh for pelvic organ prolapse. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 2016; 27 (11) 1761-1766
  • 11 Young Lin LL, Rosenkrantz AB. The U.S. online news coverage of mammography based on a Google News search. Acad Radiol 2017; 24 (12) 1612-1615
  • 12 Top 5 cosmetic minimally-invasive procedures. American Society of Plastic Surgeons; 2016
  • 13 Dermal fillers approved by the center for devices and radiological health. The United States Food & Drug Administration; 2018
  • 14 Rayess HM, Svider PF, Hanba C. , et al. A cross-sectional analysis of adverse events and litigation for injectable fillers. JAMA Facial Plast Surg 2018; 20 (03) 207-214
  • 15 Ferneini EM, Ferneini AM. An overview of vascular adverse events associated with facial soft tissue fillers: recognition, prevention, and treatment. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2016; 74 (08) 1630-1636
  • 16 Alster T. Dr. Alster: Bruising Affects 67% of Dermal Filler Patients. http://www.cearna.com/blog/dr-alster-bruising-affects-67-of-dermal-filler-patients/ . Accessed 8/21/18
  • 17 The National Health Service (NHS). Review of qualifications required for delivery of non-surgical cosmetic interventions. The National Health Service Constitution; 2014
  • 18 Joette Derricks M. Define a Qualified Healthcare Professional. The American Academy of Professional Coders; 2015
  • 19 Kandinov A, Mutchnick S, Nangia V. , et al. Analysis of factors associated with rhytidectomy malpractice litigation cases. JAMA Facial Plast Surg 2017; 19 (04) 255-259
  • 20 Mehta S, Farhadi J, Atrey A. A review of litigation in plastic surgery in England. Lessons learned. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2010; 63 (10) 1747-1748