Download PDF
Am J Perinatol 2020; 37(04): 409-414
DOI: 10.1055/s-0039-1679932
Original Article
Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.

Comparison of Endotracheal Reintubation between Nasal High-Frequency Oscillation and Continuous Positive Airway Pressure in Neonates

Anucha Thatrimontrichai
1   Division of Neonatology, Faculty of Medicine, Prince of Songkla University, Songkhla, Thailand
,
Kantisa Sirianansopa
2   Department of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine, Prince of Songkla University, Songkhla, Thailand
,
Waricha Janjindamai
1   Division of Neonatology, Faculty of Medicine, Prince of Songkla University, Songkhla, Thailand
,
Supaporn Dissaneevate
1   Division of Neonatology, Faculty of Medicine, Prince of Songkla University, Songkhla, Thailand
,
Gunlawadee Maneenil
1   Division of Neonatology, Faculty of Medicine, Prince of Songkla University, Songkhla, Thailand
› Author Affiliations Funding None.
Further Information

Publication History

15 December 2018

22 January 2019

Publication Date:
19 February 2019 (online)

    Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Objective This study aimed to compare the endotracheal reintubation between nasal high-frequency oscillation (nHFO) and nasal continuous positive airway pressure (nCPAP) with face mask groups who were followed up for up to 7 days.

Study Design We performed a retrospective cohort study of extubated neonates admitted between 2013 and 2017. We used a Cox's proportional hazards model to adjust for significant between-group differences in baseline characteristics.

Results One hundred and ninety-nine neonates were on either nHFO or nCPAP after extubation. The median (interquartile range) gestational age and birth weight were 31 (29, 33) weeks and 1,450 (1,065, 1,908) grams, respectively. From the univariate analysis, gestational age, ventilator modes, mean airway pressure, fraction of inspired oxygen, oxygen index, caffeine therapy, and initial continuous positive airway pressure level were significantly different between the nHFO and nCPAP groups. There was no significant difference in the 7-day reintubation rate of neonates on nHFO compared with nCPAP (hazard ratio: 2.39; 95% confidence interval: 0.97–5.84; p = 0.05). By multivariate analysis, there was no statistically significant difference of reintubation rate between nHFO and nCPAP by Cox's proportional hazards model.

Conclusion The nHFO mode with face mask is the choice for noninvasive ventilation to prevent reintubation during the week following extubation.

Keywords

airway - extubation - continuous positive airway pressure - high-frequency oscillation - newborn - noninvasive ventilation - reintubation

Note

The portions of this study were presented as a poster during the Fourth International Neonatology Association Conference, Belgium, June 22–24, 2018.


 

  • References

  • 1 Ferguson KN, Roberts CT, Manley BJ, Davis PG. Interventions to improve rates of successful extubation in preterm infants: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA Pediatr 2017; 171 (02) 165-174
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Mukerji A, Dunn M. High-frequency ventilation as a mode of noninvasive respiratory support. Clin Perinatol 2016; 43 (04) 725-740
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Binmanee A, El Helou S, Shivananda S, Fusch C, Mukerji A. Use of high noninvasive respiratory support pressures in preterm neonates: a single-center experience. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2017; 30 (23) 2838-2843
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 De Luca D, Dell'Orto V. Non-invasive high-frequency oscillatory ventilation in neonates: review of physiology, biology and clinical data. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 2016; fetalneonatal-2016-310664
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Praud JP, Fortin-Pellerin É. Non-invasive high-frequency oscillatory ventilation for preterm newborns: the time has come for consideration. Pediatr Pulmonol 2017; 52 (12) 1526-1528
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Mukerji A, Shah PS, Shivananda S. , et al; Canadian Neonatal Network Investigators. Survey of noninvasive respiratory support practices in Canadian neonatal intensive care units. Acta Paediatr 2017; 106 (03) 387-393
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Fischer HS, Bohlin K, Bührer C. , et al. Nasal high-frequency oscillation ventilation in neonates: a survey in five European countries. Eur J Pediatr 2015; 174 (04) 465-471
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Colaizy TT, Younis UM, Bell EF, Klein JM. Nasal high-frequency ventilation for premature infants. Acta Paediatr 2008; 97 (11) 1518-1522
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 van der Hoeven M, Brouwer E, Blanco CE. Nasal high frequency ventilation in neonates with moderate respiratory insufficiency. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 1998; 79 (01) F61-F63
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Mukerji A, Singh B, Helou SE. , et al. Use of noninvasive high-frequency ventilation in the neonatal intensive care unit: a retrospective review. Am J Perinatol 2015; 30 (02) 171-176
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Hoehn T, Krause MF. Effective elimination of carbon dioxide by nasopharyngeal high-frequency ventilation. Respir Med 2000; 94 (11) 1132-1134
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Bottino R, Pontiggia F, Ricci C. , et al. Nasal high-frequency oscillatory ventilation and CO2 removal: a randomized controlled crossover trial. Pediatr Pulmonol 2018; 53 (09) 1245-1251
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Klotz D, Schneider H, Schumann S, Mayer B, Fuchs H. Non-invasive high-frequency oscillatory ventilation in preterm infants: a randomised controlled cross-over trial. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 2018; 103 (04) F1-F5
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Rüegger CM, Lorenz L, Kamlin COF. , et al. The effect of noninvasive high-frequency oscillatory ventilation on desaturations and bradycardia in very preterm infants: a randomized crossover trial. J Pediatr 2018; 201: 269-273.e2
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Malakian A, Bashirnezhadkhabaz S, Aramesh MR, Dehdashtian M. Noninvasive high-frequency oscillatory ventilation versus nasal continuous positive airway pressure in preterm infants with respiratory distress syndrome: a randomized controlled trial. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2018; 1-151
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Mukerji A, Sarmiento K, Lee B, Hassall K, Shah V. Non-invasive high-frequency ventilation versus bi-phasic continuous positive airway pressure (BP-CPAP) following CPAP failure in infants <1250 g: a pilot randomized controlled trial. J Perinatol 2017; 37 (01) 49-53
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 De Luca D, Carnielli VP, Conti G, Piastra M. Noninvasive high frequency oscillatory ventilation through nasal prongs: bench evaluation of efficacy and mechanics. Intensive Care Med 2010; 36 (12) 2094-2100
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 De Luca D, Piastra M, Pietrini D, Conti G. Effect of amplitude and inspiratory time in a bench model of non-invasive HFOV through nasal prongs. Pediatr Pulmonol 2012; 47 (10) 1012-1018
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Aktas S, Unal S, Aksu M. , et al. Nasal HFOV with binasal cannula appears effective and feasible in ELBW newborns. J Trop Pediatr 2016; 62 (02) 165-168
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 De Luca D, Costa R, Visconti F, Piastra M, Conti G. Oscillation transmission and volume delivery during face mask-delivered HFOV in infants: bench and in vivo study. Pediatr Pulmonol 2016; 51 (07) 705-712
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Klotz D, Schaefer C, Stavropoulou D, Fuchs H, Schumann S. Leakage in nasal high-frequency oscillatory ventilation improves carbon dioxide clearance-a bench study. Pediatr Pulmonol 2017; 52 (03) 367-372
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Zhu XW, Zhao JN, Tang SF, Yan J, Shi Y. Noninvasive high-frequency oscillatory ventilation versus nasal continuous positive airway pressure in preterm infants with moderate-severe respiratory distress syndrome: a preliminary report. Pediatr Pulmonol 2017; 52 (08) 1038-1042
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Czernik C, Schmalisch G, Bührer C, Proquitté H. Weaning of neonates from mechanical ventilation by use of nasopharyngeal high-frequency oscillatory ventilation: a preliminary study. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2012; 25 (04) 374-378
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Lemyre B, Davis PG, De Paoli AG, Kirpalani H. Nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation (NIPPV) versus nasal continuous positive airway pressure (NCPAP) for preterm neonates after extubation. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2017; 2: CD003212
    PubMedGoogle Scholar