Is Early Compression Therapy after Perforator Flap Safe and Reliable?
26 July 2018
18 October 2018
17 December 2018 (online)
Background Due to the concern of circulation compromise, many surgeons hesitate to dangle or challenge the flap in the early postoperative phase. In our experience, early compression may have advantages such as collapse of dead space, evacuation of hematoma, reduction of edema, and stabilization of flap when ambulating. In this study, the effect of early compression of flaps with regard to flap physiology and outcome is evaluated.
Methods From postoperative day 3 to 5, a custom-made compression garment was fitted aiming to compress with a pressure of 30 to 35 mmHg. A total of 52 patients (52 flaps) were enrolled for the study and 48 flaps underwent early compression. The compression was applied not only over the flap but also over the extremity or trunk. The flap outcome as well as flow velocity and flow volume of the pedicle before and after compression was measured and evaluated.
Results There was no flap complication during the early compression and early ambulation. And, there was no statistical difference either in the flow velocity or in the volume before and after the compression therapy (29.21 vs. 29.42 cm/s and 7.13 vs. 6.56 cm3/s, respectively).
Conclusion Early compression with a 30-mmHg pressure customized pressure garment after the flap surgery does not affect the hemodynamics of the perforator and can be safely used after extremity reconstruction before ambulation.
- 1 Cerny M, Schantz JT, Erne H. , et al. Overview and introduction of a treatment concept for postoperative care and mobilisation after free flap transplantation in the lower extremity [in German]. Handchir Mikrochir Plast Chir 2016; 48 (06) 363-369
- 2 Kolbenschlag J, Bredenbroeker P, Daigeler A. , et al. Changes of oxygenation and hemoglobin-concentration in lower extremity free flaps during dangling. J Reconstr Microsurg 2014; 30 (05) 319-328
- 3 Jokuszies A, Neubert N, Herold C, Vogt PM. Early start of the dangling procedure in lower extremity free flap reconstruction does not affect the clinical outcome. J Reconstr Microsurg 2013; 29 (01) 27-32
- 4 Neubert N, Vogt PM, May M. , et al. Does an early and aggressive combined wrapping and dangling procedure affect the clinical outcome of lower extremity free flaps? A randomized controlled prospective study using microdialysis monitoring. J Reconstr Microsurg 2016; 32 (04) 262-270
- 5 Rohde C, Howell BW, Buncke GM. , et al. A recommended protocol for the immediate postoperative care of lower extremity free-flap reconstructions. J Reconstr Microsurg 2009; 25 (01) 15-19
- 6 Soteropulos CE, Chen JT, Poore SO, Garland CB. Postoperative management of lower extremity free tissue transfer: a systematic review. J Reconstr Microsurg 2018
- 7 Lee CH, Han SK, Dhong ES, Kim HP, Kim WK. The fate of microanastomosed digital arteries after successful replantation. Plast Reconstr Surg 2005; 116 (03) 805-810
- 8 Crandall CG, Shibasaki M, Yen TC. Evidence that the human cutaneous venoarteriolar response is not mediated by adrenergic mechanisms. J Physiol 2002; 538 (Pt 2): 599-605
- 9 Ridgway EB, Kutz RH, Cooper JS, Guo L. New insight into an old paradigm: wrapping and dangling with lower-extremity free flaps. J Reconstr Microsurg 2010; 26 (08) 559-566
- 10 Seth AK, Diamond S, Iorio ML. Outcomes of an early protocol for dependent conditioning in lower extremity microsurgical free flaps. J Reconstr Microsurg 2017; 33 (09) 670-678
- 11 Dornseifer U, Kleeberger C, Kargl L. , et al. Perfusion controlled mobilization after lower extremity free flaps-pushing the limits of time and intensity. J Reconstr Microsurg 2017; 33 (03) 179-185
- 12 Chow SP, Chen DZ, Gu YD. The significance of venous drainage in free flap transfer. Plast Reconstr Surg 1993; 91 (04) 713-715
- 13 Fukui A, Tamai S, Williams HB. The importance of venous drainage in rat flaps: an experimental study. J Reconstr Microsurg 1989; 5 (01) 19-30
- 14 Miles DA, Crosby NL, Clapson JB. The role of the venous system in the abdominal flap of the rat. Plast Reconstr Surg 1997; 99 (07) 2030-2033
- 15 Suh H, Lee AY, Park EJ, Hong JP. Negative pressure wound therapy on closed surgical wounds with dead space: animal study using a swine model. Ann Plast Surg 2016; 76 (06) 717-722
- 16 Almond LM, Khodaverdi L, Kumar B, Coveney EC. Flap anchoring following primary breast cancer surgery facilitates early hospital discharge and reduces costs. Breast Care (Basel) 2010; 5 (02) 97-101
- 17 Peter Suh HS, Hong JP. Effects of incisional negative-pressure wound therapy on primary closed defects after superficial circumflex iliac artery perforator flap harvest: randomized controlled study. Plast Reconstr Surg 2016; 138 (06) 1333-1340
- 18 Kottayasamy Seenivasagam R, Gupta V, Singh G. Prevention of seroma formation after axillary dissection--a comparative randomized clinical trial of three methods. Breast J 2013; 19 (05) 478-484
- 19 Seretis K, Goulis D, Demiri EC, Lykoudis EG. Prevention of seroma formation following abdominoplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Aesthet Surg J 2017; 37 (03) 316-323
- 20 Kuc A, Dayicioglu D. Reducing wound tension with DuoDERM™ taping technique. Eplasty 2017; 17: ic5
- 21 Cheng LF, Lee JT, Chou TD. , et al. Experience with elastic rubber bands for the tie-over dressing in skin graft. Burns 2006; 32 (02) 212-215
- 22 Boyd JB, Carlisle IR, Thomson HG, Zuker RM. A rapid and effective method of skin graft stabilization in burned children. Ann Plast Surg 1982; 9 (05) 400-401