The Journal of Hip Surgery 2018; 02(04): 167-175
DOI: 10.1055/s-0038-1676286
Special Section Article
Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.

Outcomes Measures in Hip Arthroscopy

Julian J. Sonnenfeld
1   Department of Orthopaedics, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York
,
David P. Trofa
1   Department of Orthopaedics, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York
,
Robert Westermann
2   Department of Orthopedics and Rehabilitation, University of Iowa Health Care, Iowa City, Iowa
,
Mia Hagen
3   Orthopaedic Surgery–Sports Medicine, University of Washington Medical Center, Seattle, Washington
,
James Rosneck
4   Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Cleveland Clinic Sports Health Center, Garfield Heights, Ohio
,
T. Sean Lynch
1   Department of Orthopaedics, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

29 December 2017

14 August 2018

Publication Date:
10 January 2019 (online)

Abstract

As techniques in hip arthroscopy are rapidly advancing, patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures are becoming an integral part of measuring treatment effectiveness. The movement toward developing valid and reproducible outcome measurement tools has shifted from the traditional physician-derived data to patient-centered scores. As a result, the current standard for measuring the effectiveness of any surgical treatment is to use an outcome that reflects the patient's perspective. This review highlights the quality of the questionnaire properties and their application to the patient undergoing hip arthroscopy. Although the Modified Harris Hip Score (mHHS) has historically been used as the traditional outcome measure for hip surgery, new PRO tools in the field have been developed. The Nonarthritic Hip Score (NAHS) was intended for the younger, active patient to assess hip pain and function without radiographic findings. The Copenhagen Hip and Groing Outcome Score (HAGOS) and Hip Disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (HOOS) both incorporated hip related quality of life measures. The Hip Outcome Score (HOS) was developed to assess the treatment outcomes of hip arthroscopy in young-to-middle-aged individuals. Finally, the International Hip Outcome Tool-33 (iHOT-33) addresses the outcomes of treatment in young active patients with hip disorders, in conjuction with the multicenter arthroscopy of the hip outcomes research network. Among the available literature comparing PROs in this patient population, the iHOT-33, HOS, and HOOS remain reliable, valid, and consistent available PRO tools for hip arthroscopy surgery.