In Vivo Biocompatibility of a Novel Expanded Polytetrafluoroethylene Suture for Annuloplasty
Background Expanded polytetrafluoroethylene (ePTFE) is a suture material for annuloplasty in aortic valve repair. For this particular application, it should induce minimal local stress and promote rapid tissue incorporation. To achieve this, a novel ePTFE suture with a larger diameter and high porosity in its midsection has been developed. Herein, we analyzed the acute and chronic tissue reaction to this suture material compared with a commercially available control ePTFE suture.
Methods Novel and control suture samples were implanted into dorsal skinfold chambers of BALB/c mice to analyze the early inflammatory response using intravital fluorescence microscopy over 14 days. Additional suture samples were implanted for 4 and 12 weeks in the flank musculature of mice and analyzed by histology and immunohistochemistry.
Results The implantation of novel and control ePTFE suture into the dorsal skinfold chamber did not induce an acute inflammation, as indicated by physiological numbers of rolling and adherent leukocytes in all analyzed venules. Chronic implantation into the flank musculature showed a better tissue incorporation of the novel ePTFE suture with more infiltrating cells and a higher content of Sirius red+ collagen fibers when compared with controls. Cell proliferation and viability as well as numbers of recruited CD68+ macrophages, myeloperoxidase+ neutrophilic granulocytes and CD3+ lymphocytes did not significantly differ between the groups.
Conclusion The novel ePTFE suture exhibits a good in vivo biocompatibility which is comparable to that of the control suture. Due to its improved tissue incorporation, it may provide a better long-term stability during annuloplasty.
Keywordsaortic valve and root - valve - surgery - aortic annulus - aortic regurgitation - aortic annuloplasty
Received: 09 August 2018
Accepted: 25 September 2018
20 November 2018 (online)
© 2020. Thieme. All rights reserved.
Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Stuttgart · New York
- 1 Lansac E, Di Centa I, Sleilaty G. et al. Remodeling root repair with an external aortic ring annuloplasty. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2017; 153 (05) 1033-1042
- 2 Schäfers HJ. Aortic annuloplasty: the panacea of valve-preserving aortic replacement?. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2017; 153 (05) 1043-1044
- 3 de Kerchove L, Mastrobuoni S, Boodhwani M. et al. The role of annular dimension and annuloplasty in tricuspid aortic valve repair. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2016; 49 (02) 428-437 , discussion 437–438
- 4 Schneider U, Aicher D, Miura Y, Schäfers HJ. Suture annuloplasty in aortic valve repair. Ann Thorac Surg 2016; 101 (02) 783-785
- 5 Schneider U, Hofmann C, Aicher D, Takahashi H, Miura Y, Schäfers HJ. Suture annuloplasty significantly improves the durability of bicuspid aortic valve repair. Ann Thorac Surg 2017; 103 (02) 504-510
- 6 Laschke MW, Menger MD. The dorsal skinfold chamber: a versatile tool for preclinical research in tissue engineering and regenerative medicine. Eur Cell Mater 2016; 32: 202-215
- 7 Laschke MW, Augustin VA, Sahin F. et al. Surface modification by plasma etching impairs early vascularization and tissue incorporation of porous polyethylene (Medpor® ) implants. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 2016; 104 (08) 1738-1748
- 8 Behrendt AK, Beythien M, Huber J. et al. New TiAg composite coating for bone prosthesis engineering shows promising microvascular compatibility in the murine dorsal skinfold chamber model. J Mater Sci Mater Med 2015; 26 (01) 5373
- 9 Klyscz T, Jünger M, Jung F, Zeintl H. [Cap image--a new kind of computer-assisted video image analysis system for dynamic capillary microscopy]. Biomed Tech (Berl) 1997; 42 (06) 168-175
- 10 Strieth S, Weger T, Bartesch C, Bittmann P, Stelter K, Berghaus A. Biocompatibility of porous polyethylene implants tissue-engineered by extracellular matrix and VEGF. J Biomed Mater Res A 2010; 93 (04) 1566-1573
- 11 Rücker M, Laschke MW, Junker D. et al. Angiogenic and inflammatory response to biodegradable scaffolds in dorsal skinfold chambers of mice. Biomaterials 2006; 27 (29) 5027-5038
- 12 Laschke MW, Strohe A, Scheuer C. et al. In vivo biocompatibility and vascularization of biodegradable porous polyurethane scaffolds for tissue engineering. Acta Biomater 2009; 5 (06) 1991-2001
- 13 Anderson RH. The surgical anatomy of the aortic root. Multimed Man Cardiothorac Surg 2007; 2007: 2006002386
- 14 Khelil N, Sleilaty G, Palladino M. et al. Surgical anatomy of the aortic annulus: landmarks for external annuloplasty in aortic valve repair. Ann Thorac Surg 2015; 99 (04) 1220-1226
- 15 de Kerchove L, Jashari R, Boodhwani M. et al. Surgical anatomy of the aortic root: implication for valve-sparing reimplantation and aortic valve annuloplasty. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2015; 149 (02) 425-433
- 16 Kraft CN, Burian B, Perlick L. et al. Impact of a nickel-reduced stainless steel implant on striated muscle microcirculation: a comparative in vivo study. J Biomed Mater Res 2001; 57 (03) 404-412
- 17 Moussavian MR, Laschke MW, Schlachtenberger G. et al. Perigraft vascularization and incorporation of implanted Dacron prostheses are affected by rifampicin coating. J Vasc Surg 2016; 64 (06) 1815-1824
- 18 Laschke MW, Häufel JM, Thorlacius H, Menger MD. New experimental approach to study host tissue response to surgical mesh materials in vivo. J Biomed Mater Res A 2005; 74 (04) 696-704
- 19 Abshagen K, Schrodi I, Gerber T, Vollmar B. In vivo analysis of biocompatibility and vascularization of the synthetic bone grafting substitute NanoBone. J Biomed Mater Res A 2009; 91 (02) 557-566
- 20 Druecke D, Langer S, Lamme E. et al. Neovascularization of poly(ether ester) block-copolymer scaffolds in vivo: long-term investigations using intravital fluorescent microscopy. J Biomed Mater Res A 2004; 68 (01) 10-18
- 21 Klopfleisch R, Jung F. The pathology of the foreign body reaction against biomaterials. J Biomed Mater Res A 2017; 105 (03) 927-940