Subscribe to RSS

DOI: 10.1055/s-0038-1675569
Biomechanics Potential of the Masseter and Temporal Muscles in the Mandibles of Mesofacial Subjects
Publication History
16 September 2017
03 September 2018
Publication Date:
14 November 2018 (online)

Abstract
Introduction The knowledge of the organization of the masseter muscle (MM) and the temporal muscle (TM) is extremely important when related to the study of the stomatognathic system. Moreover, some authors have shown that mastication is of great importance, not only for the intake of food but also for the systemic, mental and physical functions of the body.
Materials and Methods We have decided to analyze the biomechanical potential (length of the force arm, muscular work and mechanical advantage) of the MM and TM in the mandibles of mesofacial subjects (n = 34).
Results Our results show that the MM exhibits a better biomechanical potential than the TM (p = 0.0001).
Conclusion With these data, orthodontists may develop a specific treatment plan and get better results, especially in cases of patients in whom the biomechanical pattern of the temporomandibular joint is unfavorable.
-
References
- 1 Boer NP, Batigália F, Alonso LG, Ribeiro EC. Classification methods for human masticatory muscle fibers: critical literature review. Braz J Morphol Sci 2007; 24 (03) 164-169
- 2 Emshoff R, Emshoff I, Rudisch A, Bertram S. Reliability and temporal variation of masseter muscle thickness measurements utilizing ultrasonography. J Oral Rehabil 2003; 30 (12) 1168-1172
- 3 Farella M, Bakke M, Michelotti A, Rapuano A, Martina R. Masseter thickness, endurance and exercise-induced pain in subjects with different vertical craniofacial morphology. Eur J Oral Sci 2003; 111 (03) 183-188
- 4 Korfage JA, Brugman P, Van Eijden TM. Intermuscular and intramuscular differences in myosin heavy chain composition of the human masticatory muscles. J Neurol Sci 2000; 178 (02) 95-106
- 5 Palinkas M, Nassar MS, Cecílio FA. , et al. Age and gender influence on maximal bite force and masticatory muscles thickness. Arch Oral Biol 2010; 55 (10) 797-802
- 6 Ariji Y, Sakuma S, Izumi M. , et al. Ultrasonographic features of the masseter muscle in female patients with temporomandibular disorder associated with myofascial pain. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2004; 98 (03) 337-341
- 7 Bakke M, Thomsen CE, Vilmann A, Soneda K, Farella M, Møller E. Ultrasonographic assessment of the swelling of the human masseter muscle after static and dynamic activity. Arch Oral Biol 1996; 41 (02) 133-140
- 8 Raadsheer MC, Kiliaridis S, Van Eijden TM, Van Ginkel FC, Prahl-Andersen B. Masseter muscle thickness in growing individuals and its relation to facial morphology. Arch Oral Biol 1996; 41 (04) 323-332
- 9 Marques HB, Richter FF, Heck L, Xavier LL, de Campos D. Biomechanical potential of the temporal muscle in brachyfacial and dolichofacial subjects: a study on dry mandibles. Orthod Craniofac Res 2016; 19 (03) 162-168