Am J Perinatol 2019; 36(05): 517-521
DOI: 10.1055/s-0038-1670634
Original Article
Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.

Interpregnancy Body Mass Index Changes: Distribution and Impact on Adverse Pregnancy Outcomes in the Subsequent Pregnancy

Whitney Bender
1   Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Maternal and Child Health Research Center, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania
,
Adi Hirshberg
1   Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Maternal and Child Health Research Center, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania
,
Lisa D. Levine
1   Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Maternal and Child Health Research Center, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania
› Author Affiliations
Funding This study was supported by a National Institute of Health Reproductive Epidemiology Training Grant (5T32HD007440–15).
Further Information

Publication History

29 October 2017

07 August 2018

Publication Date:
07 September 2018 (online)

Abstract

Objective To examine the change in body mass index (BMI) categories between pregnancies and its effect on adverse pregnancy outcomes.

Study Design We performed a retrospective cohort study of women with two consecutive deliveries from 2005 to 2010. Analysis was limited to women with BMI recorded at <24 weeks for both pregnancies. Standard BMI categories were used. Adverse pregnancy outcomes included preterm birth at <37 weeks, intrauterine growth restriction (IUGR), pregnancy-related hypertension, and gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM). Women with increased BMI category between pregnancies were compared with those who remained in the same BMI category.

Results In total, 537 women were included, of whom 125 (23%) increased BMI category. There was no association between increase in BMI category and risk of preterm birth, IUGR, or pregnancy-related hypertension. Women who increased BMI category had an increased odds of GDM compared with women who remained in the same BMI category (6.4 vs. 2.2%; p = 0.018). The increased risk remained after controlling for age, history of GDM, and starting BMI (adjusted odds ratio: 8.2; 95% confidence interval: 2.1–32.7; p = 0.003).

Conclusion Almost one-quarter of women increased BMI categories between pregnancies. This modifiable risk factor has a significant impact on the risk of GDM.

Note

A poster with this data was presented at the Society for Maternal–Fetal Medicine Pregnancy Meeting on February 4, 2013.


 
  • References

  • 1 Flegal KM, Carroll MD, Ogden CL, Curtin LR. Prevalence and trends in obesity among US adults, 1999-2008. JAMA 2010; 303 (03) 235-241
  • 2 National Center for Health Statistics. Prevalence of obesity among adults and youth: United States, 2011–2014. 2015. Available at https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/databriefs/db219.pdf . Accessed June 9, 2017
  • 3 Catalano PM. Management of obesity in pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol 2007; 109 (2 Pt 1): 419-433
  • 4 Stothard KJ, Tennant PW, Bell R, Rankin J. Maternal overweight and obesity and the risk of congenital anomalies: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA 2009; 301 (06) 636-650
  • 5 Anderson NH, McCowan LM, Fyfe EM. , et al; SCOPE Consortium. The impact of maternal body mass index on the phenotype of pre-eclampsia: a prospective cohort study. BJOG 2012; 119 (05) 589-595
  • 6 Salihu HM, Dunlop AL, Hedayatzadeh M, Alio AP, Kirby RS, Alexander GR. Extreme obesity and risk of stillbirth among black and white gravidas. Obstet Gynecol 2007; 110 (03) 552-557
  • 7 Yao R, Ananth CV, Park BY, Pereira L, Plante LA. ; Perinatal Research Consortium. Obesity and the risk of stillbirth: a population-based cohort study. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2014; 210: 457.e1-457.e9
  • 8 Aune D, Saugstad OD, Henriksen T, Tonstad S. Maternal body mass index and the risk of fetal death, stillbirth, and infant death: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA 2014; 311 (15) 1536-1546
  • 9 Salihu HM, Luke S, Alio AP, Deutsch A, Marty PJ. The impact of obesity on spontaneous and medically indicated preterm birth among adolescent mothers. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2010; 282 (02) 127-134
  • 10 Lynch AM, Hart JE, Agwu OC, Fisher BM, West NA, Gibbs RS. Association of extremes of prepregnancy BMI with the clinical presentations of preterm birth. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2014; 210 (05) 428.e1-428.e9
  • 11 Hendler I, Goldenberg RL, Mercer BM. , et al. The Preterm Prediction Study: association between maternal body mass index and spontaneous and indicated preterm birth. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2005; 192 (03) 882-886
  • 12 Weiss JL, Malone FD, Emig D. , et al; FASTER Research Consortium. Obesity, obstetric complications and cesarean delivery rate--a population-based screening study. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2004; 190 (04) 1091-1097
  • 13 Hibbard JU, Gilbert S, Landon MB. , et al; National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Maternal-Fetal Medicine Units Network. Trial of labor or repeat cesarean delivery in women with morbid obesity and previous cesarean delivery. Obstet Gynecol 2006; 108 (01) 125-133
  • 14 Chu SY, Kim SY, Schmid CH. , et al. Maternal obesity and risk of cesarean delivery: a meta-analysis. Obes Rev 2007; 8 (05) 385-394
  • 15 Baugh N, Harris DE, Aboueissa A-M, Sarton C, Lichter E. The impact of maternal obesity and excessive gestational weight gain on maternal and infant outcomes in Maine: analysis of pregnancy risk assessment monitoring system results from 2000 to 2010. J Pregnancy 2016; 2016: 5871313
  • 16 Hannaford KE, Tuuli MG, Odibo L, Macones GA, Odibo AO. Gestational Weight Gain: Association with Adverse Pregnancy Outcomes. Am J Perinatol 2017; 34 (02) 147-154
  • 17 Institute of Medicine and National Research Council Committee to Reexamine IOM Pregnancy Weight Guidelines. Weight Gain during Pregnancy: Reexamining the Guidelines. Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 2009
  • 18 Truong YN, Yee LM, Caughey AB, Cheng YW. Weight gain in pregnancy: does the Institute of Medicine have it right?. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2015; 212 (03) 362.e1-362.e8
  • 19 Kabiru W, Raynor BD. Obstetric outcomes associated with increase in BMI category during pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2004; 191 (03) 928-932
  • 20 Levine LD, Bogner HR, Hirshberg A, Elovitz MA, Sammel MD, Srinivas SK. Term induction of labor and subsequent preterm birth. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2014; 210 (04) 354.e1-354.e8
  • 21 American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists; Task Force on Hypertension in Pregnancy. Report on Hypertension in Pregnancy. Washington, DC: SCOG; 2013
  • 22 McBain RD, Dekker GA, Clifton VL, Mol BW, Grzeskowiak LE. Impact of inter-pregnancy BMI change on perinatal outcomes: a retrospective cohort study. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2016; 205: 98-104
  • 23 Knight-Agarwal CR, Williams LT, Davis D. , et al. Association of BMI and interpregnancy BMI change with birth outcomes in an Australian obstetric population: a retrospective cohort study. BMJ Open 2016; 6 (05) e010667
  • 24 Wallace JM, Bhattacharya S, Campbell DM, Horgan GW. Inter-pregnancy weight change and the risk of recurrent pregnancy complications. PLoS One 2016; 11 (05) e0154812
  • 25 Haugen M, Brantsæter AL, Winkvist A. , et al. Associations of pre-pregnancy body mass index and gestational weight gain with pregnancy outcome and postpartum weight retention: a prospective observational cohort study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2014; 14: 201
  • 26 Getahun D, Ananth CV, Peltier MR, Salihu HM, Scorza WE. Changes in prepregnancy body mass index between first and second pregnancies and risk for large-for-gestational-age birth. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2007; 196: e1-e8
  • 27 Bogaerts A, Van den Bergh BR, Ameye L. , et al. Interpregnancy weight change and risk for adverse perinatal outcome. Obstet Gynecol 2013; 122 (05) 999-1009
  • 28 Ehrlich SF, Hedderson MM, Feng J, Davenport ER, Gunderson EP, Ferrara A. Change in body mass index between pregnancies and the risk of gestational diabetes in a second pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol 2011; 117 (06) 1323-1330
  • 29 Cheng CJ, Bommarito K, Noguchi A, Holcomb W, Leet T. Body mass index change between pregnancies and small for gestational age births. Obstet Gynecol 2004; 104 (02) 286-292