Does the Technique of Skin Closure Affect the Cosmesis of Cervical Thyroidectomy and Parathyroidectomy Scars? A Review of Literature

Abstract

The cosmetic outcomes following thyroid and parathyroid surgery is a priority for patients as the surgical scar is in a visible area of the body. Although some have advocated the use of minimally invasive and robotic surgery, these are not without risks and it has been suggested that the scars are not necessarily more favorable. The three most common means of skin closure include the use of subcuticular sutures, clips, and tissue adhesive (with or without deeper subcutaneous sutures) and there are no previous reviews of the published evidence. In this study, the authors compare the cosmetic outcomes through a systematic review of literature. Three studies (n = 200) comparing subcuticular sutures and clips suggest superior cosmetic outcomes with sutures (with statistically significant differences in the immediate postoperative period). Three studies (n = 213) comparing sutures and tissue adhesive show superior outcomes with sutures in the early postoperative period with no differences thereafter. Two studies (n = 202) comparing tissue adhesive and clips do not show that one is superior to the other and show no significant differences. Overall the data are limited; however, the evidence suggests that subcuticular sutures may offer superior cosmetic outcomes than clips and tissue adhesive in conventional thyroid and parathyroid surgery.

Keywords

thyroidectomy - cervicotomy - scar

Financial support

No financial support was received for this article.

• References

• 1 NHS Hospital Admitted Patient Care Activity. 2016–17. Available at: https://digital.nhs.uk/catalogue/PUB30098
• 2 Craig WL, Ramsay CR, Fielding S, Krukowski ZH. A cross-specialty survey to assess the application of risk stratified surgery for differentiated thyroid cancer in the UK. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 2014; 96 (06) 466-474
• 3 Randolph GW. Modern thyroidectomy and the tailored surgical approach. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2013; 139 (05) 517-518
• 4 Dordea M, Aspinall SR. Short and long-term cosmesis of cervical thyroidectomy scars. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 2016; 98 (01) 11-17
• 5 O'Connell DA, Diamond C, Seikaly H, Harris JR. Objective and subjective scar aesthetics in minimal access vs conventional access parathyroidectomy and thyroidectomy surgical procedures: a paired cohort study. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2008; 134 (01) 85-93
• 6 Toll EC, Loizou P, Davis CR, Porter GC, Pothier DD. Scars and satisfaction: do smaller scars improve patient-reported outcome?. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2012; 269 (01) 309-313
• 7 Ma X, Xia QJ, Li G, Wang TX, Li Q. Aesthetic principles access thyroidectomy produces the best cosmetic outcomes as assessed using the patient and observer scar assessment scale. BMC Cancer 2017; 17 (01) 654
• 8 Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG. ; PRISMA Group. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. BMJ 2009; 339: b2535
• 9 Selvadurai D, Wildin C, Treharne G, Choksy SA, Heywood MM, Nicholson ML. Randomised trial of subcuticular suture versus metal clips for wound closure after thyroid and parathyroid surgery. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 1997; 79 (04) 303-306
• 10 Iqbal MA, Shabbir MN, Ahmed I, Najam MS. Cosmetic effects of different types of skin closure techniques after thyroidectomy on scar formation: metal clips versus subcuticular sutures. Pak J Surg 2014; 30 (01) 27-29
• 11 Guarino S, Sorrenti S, Greco R. , et al. Staples versus subcuticular closure in cervicotomy incisions. Int J Surg 2014; 12 (Suppl. 01) S170-S172
• 12 Consorti F, Mancuso R, Piccolo A, Pretore E, Antonaci A. Quality of scar after total thyroidectomy: a single blinded randomized trial comparing octyl-cyanoacrylate and subcuticular absorbable suture. IRSN Surg 2013; 270953. Available at: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24324898
• 13 Draaijers LJ, Tempelman FRH, Botman YAM. , et al. The patient and observer scar assessment scale: a reliable and feasible tool for scar evaluation. Plast Reconstr Surg 2004; 113 (07) 1960-1965 , discussion 1966–1967
• 14 Alicandri-Ciufelli M, Piccinini A, Grammatica A. , et al. Aesthetic comparison between synthetic glue and subcuticular sutures in thyroid and parathyroid surgery: a single-blinded randomised clinical trial. Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital 2014; 34 (06) 406-411
• 15 Hollander JE, Singer AJ, Valentine S, Henry MC. Wound registry: development and validation. Ann Emerg Med 1995; 25 (05) 675-685
• 16 Rao VV, D'Souza C, Kumar S, Kumar A. Comparative study of thyroidectomy wound closure using tissue glue versus subcuticular suture. Thyroid Res Pract 2015; 12: 46-49
• 17 Pronio A, Di Filippo A, Narilli P. , et al. Closure of cutaneous incision after thyroid surgery: a comparison between metal clips and cutaneous octyl-2-cyanoacrylate adhesive. A prospective randomized clinical trial. Eur J Plast Surg 2011; 34: 103-110
• 18 Yang YL, Xiang YY, Jin LP. , et al. Closure of skin incision after thyroidectomy through a supraclavicular approach: a comparison between tissue adhesive and staples. Scand J Surg 2013; 102 (04) 234-240
• 19 Chughtai T, Chen LQ, Salasidis G, Nguyen D, Tchervenkov C, Morin JF. Clips versus suture technique: is there a difference?. Can J Cardiol 2000; 16 (11) 1403-1407
• 20 Parell GJ, Becker GD. Comparison of absorbable with nonabsorbable sutures in closure of facial skin wounds. Arch Facial Plast Surg 2003; 5 (06) 488-490
• 21 Amin M, Glynn F, Timon C. Randomized trial of tissue adhesive vs staples in thyroidectomy integrating patient satisfaction and Manchester score. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2009; 140 (05) 703-708
• 22 Vinay G, Balasubrahmanya KS. Comparative study of steristrips and subcuticular suture for wound closure after thyroid surgery. IJS;4(10):3392–3396. Available at: http://www.ijsurgery.com/index.php/isj/article/view/1837
• 23 Lombardi CP, Bracaglia R, Revelli L. , et al. [Aesthetic result of thyroidectomy: evaluation of different kinds of skin suture]. Ann Ital Chir 2011; 82 (06) 449-455 , n455–n456