Factors Associated with Stillbirth Autopsy in Georgia and Utah, 2010–2014: The Importance of Delivery Location

Abstract

Objective This article determines whether demographic, delivery, and medical factors are associated with stillbirth autopsy performance in Georgia and Utah.

Study Design This study used fetal death certificates from 2010 to 2014 to determine which factors are associated with stillbirth autopsy performance in Georgia and Utah. Analyses were conducted using logistic regression with a predicted margins approach.

Results The stillbirth autopsy rate was low in both states: 11.9% in Georgia (N = 5,610) and 23.9% in Utah (N = 1,425). In Utah, the autopsy rate significantly declined during the study period (p = 0.01). Stillbirths delivered outside of large metropolitan areas were less likely to receive an autopsy (medium/small metropolitans: prevalence ratio_GA [PR] = 0.57, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.48–0.68 and PR_UT = 0.48, CI: 0.38–0.59; nonmetropolitans: PR_GA = 0.57, CI: 0.43–0.75 and PR_UT = 0.37, CI: 0.21–0.63). In Georgia, autopsies were less common among stillbirths of Hispanic (vs. white) women (PR = 0.57, CI: 0.41–0.79), at earlier (vs. later) gestational ages (PR = 0.59, CI: 0.51–0.69), and of multiple birth pregnancies (PR = 0.71, CI: 0.53–0.96).

Conclusion Despite strong evidence supporting the value of stillbirth autopsies, autopsy rates were low, especially outside metropolitan areas, where approximately half of stillbirths were delivered.

Keywords

stillbirth - autopsy - fetal death - fetal death certificate - perinatal pathology - vital records

• References

• 1 Lawn JE, Blencowe H, Pattinson R. , et al; Lancet's Stillbirths Series steering committee. Stillbirths: where? When? Why? How to make the data count?. Lancet 2011; 377 (9775): 1448-1463
• 2 Burden C, Bradley S, Storey C. , et al. From grief, guilt pain and stigma to hope and pride - a systematic review and meta-analysis of mixed-method research of the psychosocial impact of stillbirth. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2016; 16: 9
• 3 MacDorman MF, Gregory EC. Fetal and perinatal mortality: United States, 2013. Natl Vital Stat Rep 2015; 64 (08) 1-24
• 4 Hanzlick R. Case of the month: wrapping things up. Arch Intern Med 2000; 160 (20) 3029-3031
• 5 McPhee SJ, Bottles K. Autopsy: moribund art or vital science?. Am J Med 1985; 78 (01) 107-113
• 6 Ernst LM. A pathologist's perspective on the perinatal autopsy. Semin Perinatol 2015; 39 (01) 55-63
• 7 Désilets V, Oligny LL. ; Genetics Committee of the Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecology Canada; Family Physicians Advisory Committee; Medico–Legal Committee of the SOGC. Fetal and perinatal autopsy in prenatally diagnosed fetal abnormalities with normal karyotype. J Obstet Gynaecol Can 2011; 33 (10) 1047-1057
• 8 Gordijn SJ, Erwich JJ, Khong TY. Value of the perinatal autopsy: critique. Pediatr Dev Pathol 2002; 5 (05) 480-488
• 9 Silver RM, Draper ML. Workup of the patient with a stillbirth. In: Spong CY. , ed. Stillbirth: Prediction, Prevention and Management. West Sussex, United Kingdom: Wiley-Blackwell; 2011: 187-202
• 10 Page JM, Christiansen-Lindquist L, Thorsten V. , et al. Diagnostic tests for evaluation of stillbirth: results from the Stillbirth Collaborative Research Network. Obstet Gynecol 2017; 129 (04) 699-706
• 11 Carr U, Bowker L, Ball RY. The slow death of the clinical post-mortem examination: implications for clinical audit, diagnostics and medical education. Clin Med (Lond) 2004; 4 (05) 417-423
• 12 Flenady V, Middleton P, Smith GC. , et al; Lancet's Stillbirths Series steering committee. Stillbirths: the way forward in high-income countries. Lancet 2011; 377 (9778): 1703-1717
• 13 Hoyert DL, Martin JA. Vital statistics as a data source. Semin Perinatol 2002; 26 (01) 12-16
• 14 ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 102: management of stillbirth. In Obstet Gynecol: American Congress of Obstetricians and Gynecologists; 2009:748–761
• 15 Heuser CC, Hunn J, Varner M, Hossain S, Vered S, Silver RM. Correlation between stillbirth vital statistics and medical records. Obstet Gynecol 2010; 116 (06) 1296-1301
• 16 Lammer EJ, Brown LE, Anderka MT, Guyer B. Classification and analysis of fetal deaths in Massachusetts. JAMA 1989; 261 (12) 1757-1762
• 17 Auger N, Tiandrazana RC, Healy-Profitós J, Costopoulos A. Inequality in fetal autopsy in Canada. J Health Care Poor Underserved 2016; 27 (03) 1384-1396
• 18 Measey MA, Charles A, d'Espaignet ET, Harrison C, Deklerk N, Douglass C. Aetiology of stillbirth: unexplored is not unexplained. Aust N Z J Public Health 2007; 31 (05) 444-449
• 19 Cannie M, Votino C, Moerman P. , et al. Acceptance, reliability and confidence of diagnosis of fetal and neonatal virtuopsy compared with conventional autopsy: a prospective study. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2012; 39 (06) 659-665
• 20 Ibiebele I, Boyle FM, Horey D. , et al. Predictors of autopsy following stillbirth in Queensland, Australia: A population-based study. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 2017; 57 (01) 33-39
• 21 National Center for Health Statistics, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Fetal Death Edit Specifications for the 2003 Revision of the U.S. Standard Report of Fetal Death. Available at: https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/dvs/fetal_death_edit_specifications.pdf . Accessed April 24, 2018
• 22 Ingram DD, Franco SJ. 2013 NCHS urban-rural classification scheme for counties. Vital Health Stat 2 2014; (166) 1-73
• 23 Bennett DA. How can I deal with missing data in my study?. Aust N Z J Public Health 2001; 25 (05) 464-469
• 24 Greenland S, Pearl J, Robins JM. Causal diagrams for epidemiologic research. Epidemiology 1999; 10 (01) 37-48
• 25 Hoyert DL, Gregory EC. Cause of fetal death: data from the Fetal Death Report, 2014. Natl Vital Stat Rep 2016; 65 (07) 1-25
• 26 Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists, Royal College of Pathologist. Fetal and Perinatal Pathology: Report of a Joint Working Party. London: RCOG Press; 2001
• 27 Parker CB, Hogue CJ, Koch MA. , et al; Stillbirth Collaborative Research Network. Stillbirth Collaborative Research Network: design, methods and recruitment experience. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol 2011; 25 (05) 425-435
• 28 Zardawi IM. Coronial autopsy in a rural setting. J Forensic Leg Med 2013; 20 (07) 848-851
• 29 National Advisory Committee on Rural Health and Human Services. The 2008 Report to the Secretary: Rural Health and Human Services Issues. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services; 2008. . Available at: https://www.hrsa.gov/advisorycommittees/rural/2008secreport.pdf . Accessed April 24, 2018
• 30 Silver RM, Varner MW, Reddy U. , et al. Work-up of stillbirth: a review of the evidence. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2007; 196 (05) 433-444
• 31 Chichester M. Requesting perinatal autopsy: multicultural considerations. MCN Am J Matern Child Nurs 2007; 32 (02) 81-86
• 32 Downe S, Kingdon C, Kennedy R, Norwell H, McLaughlin MJ, Heazell AE. Post-mortem examination after stillbirth: views of UK-based practitioners. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2012; 162 (01) 33-37
• 33 Heazell AE, McLaughlin MJ, Schmidt EB. , et al. A difficult conversation? The views and experiences of parents and professionals on the consent process for perinatal postmortem after stillbirth. BJOG 2012; 119 (08) 987-997
• 34 Lewis C, Hill M, Arthurs OJ, Hutchinson C, Chitty LS, Sebire NJ. Factors affecting uptake of postmortem examination in the prenatal, perinatal and paediatric setting. BJOG 2018; 125 (02) 172-181
• 35 Stillbirth Collaborative Research Network Writing Group. Causes of death among stillbirths. JAMA 2011; 306 (22) 2459-2468
• 36 Christiansen-Lindquist L, Silver RM, Parker CB. , et al. Fetal death certificate data quality: a tale of two US counties. Ann Epidemiol 2017; Aug; 27 (08) 466-471
• 37 Duke CW, Alverson CJ, Correa A. Fetal death certificates as a source of surveillance data for stillbirths with birth defects. Public Health Rep 2007; 122 (05) 664-669
• 38 Lydon-Rochelle MT, Cárdenas V, Nelson JL, Tomashek KM, Mueller BA, Easterling TR. Validity of maternal and perinatal risk factors reported on fetal death certificates. Am J Public Health 2005; 95 (11) 1948-1951