Download PDF
J Reconstr Microsurg 2018; 34(09): 685-691
DOI: 10.1055/s-0038-1641680
Original Article
Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.

A Multicenter Analysis Examining Patients Undergoing Conversion of Implant-based Breast Reconstruction to Abdominally based Free Tissue Transfer

Ruya Zhao
1   Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina
,
Bao Ngoc N. Tran
2   Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts
,
Andres F. Doval
2   Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts
,
Gloria Broadwater
3   Biostatistics, Duke Cancer Institute, Durham, North Carolina
,
Kate J. Buretta
1   Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina
,
Jonah P. Orr
1   Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina
,
Bernard T. Lee
2   Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts
,
Scott T. Hollenbeck
1   Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

11 December 2017

22 February 2018

Publication Date:
07 May 2018 (online)

Also available at
   Permissions and Reprints

Letter to:

Tertiary Breast Reconstruction for Salvage of the Failed Implant-Based Reconstruction Using the Deep Inferior Epigastric Perforator FlapJ Reconstr Microsurg 2018; 34(09): e1-e2
DOI: 10.1055/s-0039-1679885

Abstract

Background Breast implant placement is the most common method for postmastectomy reconstruction. For patients who develop complications associated with implant-based reconstruction, additional surgeries may be challenging. This study examined implant-based reconstruction failure in patients undergoing salvage with abdominal free tissue transfer.

Methods We conducted an Institutional Review Board approved, multicenter retrospective study of patients with implant-based primary breast reconstruction followed by implant removal and subsequent abdominal free tissue transfer between 2006 and 2016. Patient demographics, treatment details, and complications were evaluated. Severity of implant failure was graded as either (1) not severe (delayed salvage reconstruction) or (2) severe (immediate salvage reconstruction).

Results Between 2006 and 2016, 115 patients with 180 mastectomy defects underwent primary implant-based reconstruction with subsequent implant removal and abdominally based free tissue reconstruction. Of these, 68 were delayed and 47 were immediate salvage reconstruction. Factors leading to elective removal were capsular contracture, asymmetry, and implant malposition. Factors leading to obligatory removal were infection, delayed wound healing, and implant extrusion. Postmastectomy radiation was significantly associated with immediate salvage reconstruction (p < 0.001, odds ratio = 3.9) as were large volume implants (p = 0.06). Deep inferior epigastric perforator flaps comprised 78.3% of all abdominally based free tissue reconstructions, while muscle-sparing transverse rectus abdominus myocutaneous flaps comprised 18.3%. Overall flap failure rate was 2.6% (2.94% delayed and 2.13% immediate salvage reconstruction; p = 1.0).

Conclusion Our findings suggest that abdominal free tissue transfer remains a safe and effective salvage modality for implant-based breast reconstruction failure. Patients with severe implant failure were more likely to have received radiation. Surgeons should remain cognizant of this during care of patients.

Keywords

breast reconstruction - abdominal free flap - salvage reconstruction
 

  • References

  • 1 American Society of Plastic Surgeons. “2016 National Clearinghouse of Plastic Surgery Statistics”. Plasticsurgery.org. www.plasticsurgery.org/documents/News/Statistics/2016/plastic-surgery-statistics-full-report-2016.pdf . Last accessed March 27, 2017.
    PubMed
  • 2 Elder EE, Brandberg Y, Björklund T. , et al. Quality of life and patient satisfaction in breast cancer patients after immediate breast reconstruction: a prospective study. Breast 2005; 14 (03) 201-208
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 3 Murphy Jr RX, Wahhab S, Rovito PF. , et al. Impact of immediate reconstruction on the local recurrence of breast cancer after mastectomy. Ann Plast Surg 2003; 50 (04) 333-338
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 4 Serletti JM, Fosnot J, Nelson JA, Disa JJ, Bucky LP. Breast reconstruction after breast cancer. Plast Reconstr Surg 2011; 127 (06) 124e-135e
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 5 Cordeiro PG. Breast reconstruction after surgery for breast cancer. N Engl J Med 2008; 359 (15) 1590-1601
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 6 Center for Devices and Radiological Health. “Breast Implants - Breast Implant-Associated Anaplastic Large Cell Lymphoma (BIA-ALCL).” U S Food and Drug Administration Home Page, Center for Devices and Radiological Health, www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/ProductsandMedicalProcedures/ImplantsandProsthetics/BreastImplants/ucm239995.htm . Last accessed March 1, 2017.
  • 7 de Jong D, Vasmel WL, de Boer JP. , et al. Anaplastic large-cell lymphoma in women with breast implants. JAMA 2008; 300 (17) 2030-2035
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 8 Alderman A, Gutowski K, Ahuja A, Gray D. ; Postmastectomy Expander Implant Breast Reconstruction Guideline Work Group. ASPS clinical practice guideline summary on breast reconstruction with expanders and implants. Plast Reconstr Surg 2014; 134 (04) 648e-655e
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 9 Alderman AK, Wilkins EG, Kim HM, Lowery JC. Complications in postmastectomy breast reconstruction: two-year results of the Michigan Breast Reconstruction Outcome Study. Plast Reconstr Surg 2002; 109 (07) 2265-2274
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 10 Voineskos SH, Frank SG, Cordeiro PG. Breast reconstruction following conservative mastectomies: predictors of complications and outcomes. Gland Surg 2015; 4 (06) 484-496
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 11 Shea-Budgell M, Quan ML, Mehling B, Temple-Oberle C. Breast reconstruction following prophylactic or therapeutic mastectomy for breast cancer: Recommendations from an evidence-based provincial guideline. Plast Surg (Oakv) 2014; 22 (02) 103-111
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 12 Hanwright PJ, Davila AA, Hirsch EM. , et al. The differential effect of BMI on prosthetic versus autogenous breast reconstruction: a multivariate analysis of 12,986 patients. Breast 2013; 22 (05) 938-945
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 13 Szloch J, Marczyk E, Kołodziej-Rzepa M, Komorowski AL. Impact of different type of cancer treatment on the effectiveness of breast reconstruction. Gland Surg 2016; 5 (04) 444-449
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 14 McCarthy CM, Mehrara BJ, Riedel E. , et al. Predicting complications following expander/implant breast reconstruction: an outcomes analysis based on preoperative clinical risk. Plast Reconstr Surg 2008; 121 (06) 1886-1892
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 15 Strålman K, Mollerup CL, Kristoffersen US, Elberg JJ. Long-term outcome after mastectomy with immediate breast reconstruction. Acta Oncol 2008; 47 (04) 704-708
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 16 Wang F, Peled AW, Chin R. , et al. The impact of radiation therapy, lymph node dissection, and hormonal therapy on outcomes of tissue expander-implant exchange in prosthetic breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 2016; 137 (01) 1-9
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 17 Kearney AM, Brown MS, Soltanian HT. Timing of radiation and outcomes in implant-based breast reconstruction. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2015; 68 (12) 1719-1726
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 18 Nava MB, Pennati AE, Lozza L, Spano A, Zambetti M, Catanuto G. Outcome of different timings of radiotherapy in implant-based breast reconstructions. Plast Reconstr Surg 2011; 128 (02) 353-359
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 19 Behranwala KA, Dua RS, Ross GM, Ward A, A'hern R, Gui GP. The influence of radiotherapy on capsule formation and aesthetic outcome after immediate breast reconstruction using biodimensional anatomical expander implants. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2006; 59 (10) 1043-1051
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 20 Spear SL, Onyewu C. Staged breast reconstruction with saline-filled implants in the irradiated breast: recent trends and therapeutic implications. Plast Reconstr Surg 2000; 105 (03) 930-942
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 21 Cowen D, Gross E, Rouannet P. , et al. Immediate post-mastectomy breast reconstruction followed by radiotherapy: risk factors for complications. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2010; 121 (03) 627-634
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 22 Magill LJ, Robertson FP, Jell G, Mosahebi A, Keshtgar M. Determining the outcomes of post-mastectomy radiation therapy delivered to the definitive implant in patients undergoing one- and two-stage implant-based breast reconstruction: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2017; 70 (10) 1329-1335
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 23 Barry M, Kell MR. Radiotherapy and breast reconstruction: a meta-analysis. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2011; 127 (01) 15-22
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 24 Anderson PR, Hanlon AL, Fowble BL, McNeeley SW, Freedman GM. Low complication rates are achievable after postmastectomy breast reconstruction and radiation therapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2004; 59 (04) 1080-1087
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 25 Jhaveri JD, Rush SC, Kostroff K. , et al. Clinical outcomes of postmastectomy radiation therapy after immediate breast reconstruction. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2008; 72 (03) 859-865
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 26 Wong JS, Ho AY, Kaelin CM. , et al. Incidence of major corrective surgery after post-mastectomy breast reconstruction and radiation therapy. Breast J 2008; 14 (01) 49-54
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 27 Kronowitz SJ. Current status of autologous tissue-based breast reconstruction in patients receiving postmastectomy radiation therapy. Plast Reconstr Surg 2012; 130 (02) 282-292
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 28 Ribuffo D, Monfrecola A, Guerra M. , et al. Does postoperative radiation therapy represent a contraindication to expander-implant based immediate breast reconstruction? An update 2012-2014. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci 2015; 19 (12) 2202-2207
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 29 El-Sabawi B, Carey JN, Hagopian TM, Sbitany H, Patel KM. Radiation and breast reconstruction: algorithmic approach and evidence-based outcomes. J Surg Oncol 2016; 113 (08) 906-912
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 30 Kronowitz SJ, Robb GL. Radiation therapy and breast reconstruction: a critical review of the literature. Plast Reconstr Surg 2009; 124 (02) 395-408
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 31 Woo KJ, Paik JM, Mun GH, Pyon JK, Jeon BJ, Bang SI. Analysis of factors influencing drain amount, time to drain removal, and seroma formation in patients undergoing immediate expander-implant breast reconstruction. J Plast Surg Hand Surg 2018; 52 (01) 53-59
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 32 Choi M, Frey JD, Alperovich M, Levine JP, Karp NS. “Breast in a day”: examining single-stage immediate, permanent implant reconstruction in nipple-sparing mastectomy. Plast Reconstr Surg 2016; 138 (02) 184e-191e
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 33 Huo J, Smith BD, Giordano SH, Reece GP, Tina Shih YC. A comparison of patient-centered economic and clinical outcomes of post-mastectomy breast reconstruction between obese and non-obese patients. Breast 2016; 30: 118-124
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 34 Hamdi M, Casaer B, Andrades P. , et al. Salvage (tertiary) breast reconstruction after implant failure. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2011; 64 (03) 353-359
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 35 Levine SM, Lester ME, Fontenot B, Allen Sr RJ. Perforator flap breast reconstruction after unsatisfactory implant reconstruction. Ann Plast Surg 2011; 66 (05) 513-517
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 36 Kroll SS, Baldwin B. A comparison of outcomes using three different methods of breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 1992; 90 (03) 455-462
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 37 Ricci JA, Epstein S, Momoh AO, Lin SJ, Singhal D, Lee BT. A meta-analysis of implant-based breast reconstruction and timing of adjuvant radiation therapy. J Surg Res 2017; 218: 108-116
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 38 Dolen U, Cohen JB, Overschmidt B, Tenenbaum MM, Myckatyn TM. Fat grafting with tissue liquefaction technology as an adjunct to breast reconstruction. Aesthetic Plast Surg 2016; 40 (06) 854-862
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 39 Sarfati I, Ihrai T, Kaufman G, Nos C, Clough KB. Adipose-tissue grafting to the post-mastectomy irradiated chest wall: preparing the ground for implant reconstruction. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2011; 64 (09) 1161-1166
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 40 Sultan SM, Stern CS, Allen Jr RJ. , et al. Human fat grafting alleviates radiation skin damage in a murine model. Plast Reconstr Surg 2011; 128 (02) 363-372
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 41 Garza RM, Paik KJ, Chung MT. , et al. Studies in fat grafting: part III. Fat grafting irradiated tissue--improved skin quality and decreased fat graft retention. Plast Reconstr Surg 2014; 134 (02) 249-257
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 42 de Blacam C, Momoh AO, Colakoglu S, Tobias AM, Lee BT. Evaluation of clinical outcomes and aesthetic results after autologous fat grafting for contour deformities of the reconstructed breast. Plast Reconstr Surg 2011; 128 (05) 411e-418e
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar