Facial Plast Surg 2018; 34(02): 155-158
DOI: 10.1055/s-0038-1636905
Original Article
Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.

Hairline Restoration: Difference in Men and Woman—Length and Shape

Regina Rodman
1   Department of Facial Plastics, Houston Plastic Craniofacial and Sinus Surgery, Houston, Texas
Angela Kay Sturm
2   Facial Plastic Surgery Associates, Clinic, Houston, Texas
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
09 April 2018 (online)


Hair restoration has become increasingly popular in recent years with both men and women. New technologies such as follicular unit extraction and grafting have made it possible for patients to get a natural looking result with minimal downtime. Men usually experience hairline recession as a result of androgenic alopecia, while women most commonly experience thinning of the crown and vertex, with the preservation of the hairline. However, there is a growing population of women who wish to advance their hairline forward because of congenital high hairline, traction alopecia, or previous facial cosmetic surgery. There are several key differences between the female and male hairline. Understanding such differences and following certain guidelines will help the facial plastic surgeon to obtain beautiful and natural appearing results.

  • References

  • 1 2017 Practice Census Results. Available at: www.ishrs.org/statistics-research.htm . Accessed December 6, 2017
  • 2 Spiegel JH. Facial determinants of female gender and feminizing forehead cranioplasty. Laryngoscope 2011; 121 (02) 250-261
  • 3 Shapiro R, Shapiro P. Hairline design and frontal hairline restoration. Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am 2013; 21 (03) 351-362
  • 4 Lam SM. Complications in hair restoration. Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am 2013; 21 (04) 675-680
  • 5 Shapiro R. Principles and techniques used to create a natural hairline in surgical hair restoration. Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am 2004; 12 (02) 201-217
  • 6 Epstein J, Bared A, Kuka G. Ethnic considerations in hair restoration surgery. Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am 2014; 22 (03) 427-437
  • 7 Nusbaum BP, Fuentefria S. Naturally occurring female hairline patterns. Dermatol Surg 2009; 35 (06) 907-913
  • 8 Kite A, Lucas VS. Hair transplant: a basic review. Plast Surg Nurs 2015; 35 (02) 66-68
  • 9 McKinney P, Mossie RD, Zukowski ML. Criteria for the forehead lift. Aesthetic Plast Surg 1991; 15 (02) 141-147
  • 10 Ramirez AL, Ende KH, Kabaker SS. Correction of the high female hairline. Arch Facial Plast Surg 2009; 11 (02) 84-90
  • 11 Jung JH, Rah DK, Yun IS. Classification of the female hairline and refined hairline correction techniques for Asian women. Dermatol Surg 2011; 37 (04) 495-500
  • 12 Altman K. Facial feminization surgery: current state of the art. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2012; 41 (08) 885-894
  • 13 Park JH. Novel principles and techniques to create a natural design in female hairline correction surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 2016; 3 (12) e589
  • 14 Hillairet de Boisferon A, Uttley L, Quinn PC, Lee K, Pascalis O. Female face preference in 4-month-olds: the importance of hairline. Infant Behav Dev 2014; 37 (04) 676-681
  • 15 Cho S-W, Jin HR. Feminization of the forehead in a transgender: frontal sinus reshaping combined with brow lift and hairline lowering. Aesthetic Plast Surg 2012; 36 (05) 1207-1210
  • 16 Capitán L, Simon D, Meyer T. , et al. Facial feminization surgery: simultaneous hair transplant during forehead reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 2017; 139 (03) 573-584
  • 17 Gupta AK, Lyons DCA, Daigle D. Progression of surgical hair restoration techniques. J Cutan Med Surg 2015; 19 (01) 17-21