Subscribe to RSS
Impact of Peanut Ball Device on the Duration of Active Labor: A Randomized Control TrialFunding None.
21 January 2018
26 January 2018
06 March 2018 (online)
Objective To evaluate whether the use of a peanut ball device shortens the duration of active labor in nulliparas.
Study Design Single-site, nonblinded randomized trial in nulliparous women admitted for labor or labor induction. English-speaking women > 18 years of age with singleton pregnancies were enrolled. Participants were randomized to the use of peanut ball or usual care upon reaching the active phase of labor (≥ 6 cm cervical dilation) with an epidural. Primary outcome was rate of cervical dilation. Secondary outcomes were rates of cesarean delivery and fetal presentation at time of full dilation or delivery.
Results Ninety-six patients enrolled; 63 reached full cervical dilation. There was no statistically significant difference in rates of cervical dilation (0.98cm/h vs. 0.79cm/h, p = 0.27) or length of labor (315 minutes vs. 387 minutes, p = 0.14) between the groups. There was no difference in the rates of cesarean delivery (33% vs. 35%, p = 0.8) or occiput posterior presentation. (28% vs. 9%, p = 0.09). Among the subgroup who had labor arrest, fewer patients using the peanut ball experienced arrest of dilation; this approached but did not reach statistical significance (30% vs. 73% p = 0.05).
Conclusion Use of the peanut ball does not significantly increase rates of cervical dilation or decrease time in active labor.
- 1 Martin JA, Hamilton BE, Osterman MJ, Driscoll AK, Mathews TJ. Births: final data for 2015. National vital statistics reports: from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Health Statistics. National Vital Statistics System 2017; 66: 1
- 2 2020 Topics and Objectives: Maternal, Infant and Child Health. Available at: https://www.healthypeople.gov/2020/topics-objectives/topic/maternal-infant-and-child-health/objectives . Accessed February 9, 2018
- 3 Gifford DS, Morton SC, Fiske M, Keesey J, Keeler E, Kahn KL. Lack of progress in labor as a reason for cesarean. Obstet Gynecol 2000; 95 (04) 589-595
- 4 Cheng YW, Shaffer BL, Bryant AS, Caughey AB. Length of the first stage of labor and associated perinatal outcomes in nulliparous women. Obstet Gynecol 2010; 116 (05) 1127-1135
- 5 Cheng YW, Delaney SS, Hopkins LM, Caughey AB. The association between the length of first stage of labor, mode of delivery, and perinatal outcomes in women undergoing induction of labor. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2009; 201 (05) 477.e1-477.e7
- 6 Zwelling E. Overcoming the challenges: maternal movement and positioning to facilitate labor progress. Am J Matern Child Nurs 2010; 35 (02) 72-78
- 7 Gupta JK, Sood A, Hofmeyr GJ, Vogel JP. Position in the second stage of labour for women without epidural anaesthesia. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2017; 5: CD002006
- 8 Kibuka M, Thornton JG. Position in the second stage of labour for women with epidural anaesthesia. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2017; 2: CD008070
- 9 Lawrence A, Lewis L, Hofmeyr GJ, Styles C. Maternal positions and mobility during first stage labour. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2013; CD003934
- 10 Fenwick L, Simkin P. Maternal positioning to prevent or alleviate dystocia in labor. Clin Obstet Gynecol 1987; 30 (01) 83-89
- 11 Taavoni S, Sheikhan F, Abdolahian S, Ghavi F. Birth ball or heat therapy? A randomized controlled trial to compare the effectiveness of birth ball usage with sacrum-perineal heat therapy in labor pain management. Complement Ther Clin Pract 2016; 24: 99-102
- 12 Makvandi S, Latifnejad Roudsari R, Sadeghi R, Karimi L. Effect of birth ball on labor pain relief: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Obstet Gynaecol Res 2015; 41 (11) 1679-1686
- 13 Taavoni S, Abdolahian S, Haghani H, Neysani L. Effect of birth ball usage on pain in the active phase of labor: a randomized controlled trial. J Midwifery Womens Health 2011; 56 (02) 137-140
- 14 Mayberry LJ, Strange LB, Suplee PD, Gennaro S. Use of upright positioning with epidural analgesia: findings from an observational study. Am J Matern Child Nurs 2003; 28 (03) 152-159
- 15 Tussey CM, Botsios E, Gerkin RD, Kelly LA, Gamez J, Mensik J. Reducing length of labor and cesarean surgery rate using a peanut ball for women laboring with an epidural. J Perinat Educ 2015; 24 (01) 16-24
- 16 Roth C, Dent SA, Parfitt SE, Hering SL, Bay RC. Randomized controlled trial of use of the peanut ball during labor. Am J Matern Child Nurs 2016; 41 (03) 140-146
- 17 Neal JL, Lowe NK, Ahijevych KL, Patrick TE, Cabbage LA, Corwin EJ. “Active labor” duration and dilation rates among low-risk, nulliparous women with spontaneous labor onset: a systematic review. J Midwifery Womens Health 2010; 55 (04) 308-318
- 18 Boyle A, Reddy UM, Landy HJ, Huang CC, Driggers RW, Laughon SK. Primary cesarean delivery in the United States. Obstet Gynecol 2013; 122 (01) 33-40
- 19 American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists; Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine. Obstetric care consensus no. 1: safe prevention of the primary cesarean delivery. Obstet Gynecol 2014; 123 (03) 693-711