Download PDF
Methods Inf Med 1974; 13(04): 242-248
DOI: 10.1055/s-0038-1636155
Original Article
Schattauer GmbH

Biomedical Literature Dynamics

Literaturdynamik in der Biomedizin
D. H. Kraft
,
R. A. Polacsek
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
10 February 2018 (online)

    Permissions and Reprints

This paper outlines the objective, background, rationale, specific aims, methods of procedure, and significance of a proposed research effort to develop a model of biomedical literature dynamics for study and use. Based on existing knowledge of the documentation process, the model would incorporate the factors of growth, obsolescence, and scattering of the biomedical journal literature, in terms of productivity and usage. The model could then be used, upon confrontation with data, to understand the variations in the dynamics of the bodies of literature in several biomedical disciplines. Several factors, such as discipline size and age, would be considered in the analysis of this variance. Finally, the model would be used as a basis for the consideration and comparison of several existing simple decision models, related to collection development and location in biomedical libraries.

In der vorliegenden Arbeit werden Vorgeschichte, Grundlagen, besondere Ziele, Methodik und allgemeine Bedeutung eines Projektes beschrieben, das die Entwicklung eines Modelles zur Untersuchung der biomedizinischen Literaturdynamik zum Ziele hat. Das Model baut auf bestehendem Wissen über den Dokumentationsvorgang auf, und es berücksichtigt Faktoren wie Wachstum, Obsoleszenz und Streuung der biomedizinischen Zeitschriftenliteratur, wie sie sich in der Produktivität und der Benutzung ausdrückt. Das Modell kann dann in der Praxis zum Verständnis der auf die Literaturbestände wirksamen Kräfte in verschiedenen biomedizinischen Fächern dienen. In einer solchen Varianzanalyse werden Faktoren wie Umfang und Alter eines Fachgebietes zu berücksichtigen sein. Schließlich soll das Modell als Grundlage und zu Vergleichszwecken für die Bedeutung einiger einfacher Entscheidungsmodelle für Aufbau und Standortbestimmung von Literaturgruppen in biomedizinischen Bibliotheken dienen.

Key-Words

Research Methodology - Library Operations Research - Biomedical Literature Dynamics - Biomedical Journal Selection and Disposition

Schlüsselwörter

Forschungsmethodik - Operations Research in the Bibliothek - biomedizinische Literaturdynamik - biomedizinische Zeitschriftenauswahl und –aufstellung
 

  • References

  • 1 Bishop D, Osborn D. K. Translation frequency as a [34 guide to the selection of Soviet biomedical serials. Bull. med. Libr. Ass 52 1964; 557-567.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Bradford S. C. Documentation. London: Crosly Lockwood; 1948
    Google Scholar
  • 3 Brookes B. C. The Derivation and Application of the Brad ford-Zipf Distribution. J. Document 24 1968; 247-265.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Brookes B. C. Bradford’s Law and the Bibliography of Science. Nature 224 1969; 953-956.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Brookes B. C. The Complete Bradford-Zipf >Bibliograph<. J. Document 25 1969; 58-60.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Brookes B. C. Photocopies vs. Periodicals. Cost-Effectivenessin the Special Library. J. Document 26 1970; 22-29.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Brookes B. C. Obsolescence of Special Library Periodicals: Sampling Errors and »Utility Contours«. J. Amor. Soc. Inform. Sei 21 1970; 320-329.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Brookes B. C. The Growth, Utility, and Obsolescence of Scientific Periodical Literature. J. Document 26 1970; 283-294.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Brookes B. C. Library Zipf. J. Document 25 1969; 155.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Brown C. H. Scientific serials: characteristics and list of most cited publications in mathematics, physics, chemistry, geology, physiology, botany, zoology, and entomology. ACRL monograph. 16. 1965
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Buckland M. K, Hindle A. Library Zipf. J. Document. [43 25 1969; 54-57.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Buckland M. K, Hindle A, Mackenzie A. G, Wood-Burn I. Systems Analysis of a University Library: Final Report on a Research-Project. University of Lancaster Library; Lancaster, England: 1970
    Google Scholar
  • 13 Cole P. F. A New Look at Reference Scattering. J. Document 18 1962; 58-64.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Cole P. F. Journal Usage versus Age of Journal. J. Document 19 1963; 1-11.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 De Solla DPrice. Networks of Scientific Papers. In Kochen M. (Edit.): The Growth of Knowledge. New York: Wiley; 1967
    Google Scholar
  • 16 Dolby J. L, Resnikoff H. L. On the Multiplication Structure of Information Storage and Access Systems. Interfaces 01 1971; 23-30.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Fairthorne R. A. Progress in Documentation. Empirical Hyperbolic Distributions (Bradford-Zipf-Mandelbrot) for Bibliometric Description and Prediction. J. Document 25 1969; 319-343.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Fairthorne R. A. Library Zipf. J. Document 25 1969; 152.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Fleming T. P, Kilgotjr F. Moderately and heavily used biomedical serials. Bull. med. Libr. Ass 52 1964; 234-241.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Goffman W. Stability of Epidemic Processes. Nature 210 1966; 786-787.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Goffman W. An Epidemic Process in an Open Population. Nature 205 1965; 831-832.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Goffman W. A Mathematical Approach to the Spread of Scientific Ideas. Nature 212 1966; 449-452.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Goffman W. A Mathematical Method for Analyzing the Growth of a Scientific Discipline. J. Ass, Comput. Machin. 18. 173-185.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Goffman W, Morris T. Bradford’s Law and Library Acquisitions. Nature 226 1970; 922-923.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Goffman W, Newill V. A. Generalizations of Epidemic Theory; an Application to the Transmission of Ideas. Nature 204 1964; 225-228.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Goffman W, Newill V. A. Communication and Epidemic Processes. Proc. Roy. Soc. A 298 1967; 316-334.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Goffman W, Warren L. S. Dispersion of Papers among Journals, Based on a Mathematical Analysis of Two Diverse Medical Literatures. Nature 221 1969; 1205-1207.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Gregory J. Evaluation of medical periodicals. Bull. med. Libr. Ass. 25 (1937) 172-188 and 27 1939; 242-244.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Hacker H. L. Financial Problems of the Large Library. Libr. Quart 38 1968; 41-57.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Haight F. A. Some Statistical Problems in Connection with Word Association Data. J. math. Psychol 03 1966; 217-219.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 31 Hummel K. Literature analysis of the scientific activity of different countries in the field of immunology. Meth. Inform. Med 05 1966; 1-18.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 32 Jain A. A Statistical Study of Book Usage. Doctoral thesis, School of Industrial Engineering. Purdue University, Lafayette, Indiana; 1967
    Google Scholar
  • 33 Kendall M. G. The Bibliography of Operational Research. Operat. Res. Quart 02 1960; 31-36.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 34 Kilgour F. G. Density of library book use in biology and medicine. Proceedings ADI annual meeting, Automation and scientific communication, Part 02 1963; 263-264.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 35 Kilgour F. G. Recorded use of books in the Yale Medical Library. I. Frequently used journals. Bull. med. Libr. Ass 50 1962; 429-443.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 36 Kilgotjr F. G. Use of medical and biological journals in the Yale Medical Library. Amer. Documentation 12 1961; 266-269.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 37 Kilgour F. G. Use of medical and biological journals in the Yale Medical Library. II. Moderately used journals. Bull. med. Libr. Ass 50 1962; 444-449.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 38 Kraft D. H. A Comment on the Morse-Elston Model of Probabilistic Obsolescence. Operat. Res 18 1970; 1228-1233.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 39 Kraft D. H, Hill Jr T. W.. A Journal Selection Model and Its Implications for Librarians. Inform. Stor. Retr 09 1973; 1-11.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 40 Lehnus D. J. Who Cited What? A Citation Analysis of the Four Basic Cataloging Texts. J. Amer. Soc. Inform. Sci 23 1972; 100-108.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 41 Leimkuhler F. F. Systems Analysis in University Libraries. Coll. Res. Libr 27 1966; 13-18.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 42 Leimkuhler F. F. The Bradford Distribution. J. Document 23 1967; 197-207.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 43 Leimkuhler F. F, Cooper M. D. Analytical Models for Library Planning. J. Amer. Soc. Inform. Sci 22 1971; 390-398.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 44 Line M. B. The >Half-Life< of Periodical Literature: Apparent and Real Obsolescence. J. Document 26 1970; 46-54.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 45 Lister W. C. Least Cost Decision Rules for the Selection of Library Materials for Compact Storage. Doctoral dissertation, School of Industrial Engineering. Purdue University, Lafayette, Indiana; 1967
    Google Scholar
  • 46 Mandelbrot B. The Variation of Certain Speculative Prices. J. Business 36 1963; 394-419.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 47 Mandelbrot B. How long is the Coast of Britain? Statistical Self-similarity and Fractional Dimension. Science 156 1967; 636-638.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 48 Morse E. H. Supply and demand in medical literature. J. Einstein Med. Center S 1960; 284-287.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 49 Morse P. Library Effectiveness: A Systems Approach. MIT Press: Cambridge, Mass: 1968
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 50 Morse P, Elston C. A Probabilistic Model for Obsolescence. Operat. Res 17 1969; 36-47.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 51 Oliver M. R. The Effect of Growth on the Obsolescence of Semi-conductor Physics Literature. J. Document 27 1971; 11-17.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 52 Orr R. H, Leeds A. A. Biomedical literature: volume, growth, and other characteristics. Fed. Proc 23 1964; 1310-1331.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 53 Orr R. H, Crouse E. M. Secondary publication in cardiovascular endocrine and psycliopharmacologic research. Amer. Document 13 1962; 197-203.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 54 Orr R. H, Coyl E. B, Leeds A. A. Communicationproblems in biomedical research; report of a study. Fed. Proc 23 1964; 1117-1132.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 55 O’Neill E. T. Journal Usage Patterns and Tlieir Implications in the Planning of Library Systems. Doctoral dissertation, School of Industrial Engineering, Purdue University, Lafayette, Indiana. 1970
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 56 O’Neill E. T. The Generalized Bradford Distribution. Research Memorandum No. 1, School of Information and Library Studies. State University of New York at Buffalo; 72.
    Google Scholar
  • 57 Raisig L. M. The circulation analysis of serial use: numbers or key to serve. Bull. med. Libr. Ass 55 1967; 399-407.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 58 Raisig L. M. Mathematical evaluation of the scientific serial. Science 131 1960; 1417-1419.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 59 Raisig L. M. Statistical bibliography in the health sciences. Bull. med. Libr. Ass 59 1962; 450-461.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 60 Raisig L. M, Kilgour F. The use of medical theses as demonstrated by journal citations. Coll. Res. Libr 25 1964; 93-102.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 61 Raisig L. M. World biomedical journals, 1951-60: a study of the relative significance of 1388 titles indexed in Current List of Medical Literature. Bull. med. Libr. Ass 54 1966; 108-125.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 62 Raisig L. J, Smith M, Cuff R, Kilgour F. G. How biomedical investigators use library books. Bull. med. Libr. Ass 54 1966; 104-107.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 63 Resnikoff H. L. On Information Systems, with Emphasis on the Mathematical Sciences. Conference Board of the Mathematical Sciences: Washington, D.C. 1971
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 64 Simon H. A. On a Class of Skew Distribution Functions. Biometrika 42 1955; 425-440.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 65 Stangl P, Kilgour F. G. Analysis of recorded bio* medical book and journal use in the Yale Medical LibraryPart I. Date and subject relations. Bull. med. Libr. Ass 55 1966; 290-300.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 66 Stangl P, Kilgour F. G. Part II. Subject and user relations. Bull. med. Libr. Ass 55 1967; 301-320.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 67 Vickery B. C. Bradford’s Law of Scattering. J. Document 04 1948; 198-203.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 68 Wilkinson E. A. The Ambiguity of Bradford’s Law. J. Document 2S 1972; 122-130.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 69 Williams G, Bryant E. C, Wiederkehr R. R.V, Palmour V. E. Library Cost Models: Owing Versus Borrowing Serial Publications, unpublished report. Center for Research Libraries; Chicago: 1968
    Google Scholar
  • 70 Zunde P, Slamecka V. Distribution of Indexing Terms for Maximum Efficiency of Information Transmission. Amer. Document IS 1967; 104-108.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 71 Polacsek R. A. Analysis of data obtained from continuous recording of the use of information material in a major medical library, unpublished paper. Welch Medical Library, Johns Hopkins University; Baltimore, Md: 1973
    Google Scholar
  • 72 Buckland M. K. Are Obsolescence and Scattering Related?. J. Document 28 1972; 242-246.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar