Download PDF
Methods Inf Med 1996; 35(01): 59-71
DOI: 10.1055/s-0038-1634633
Original Article
Schattauer GmbH

Classification Systems in Nursing: Formalizing Nursing Knowledge and Implications for Nursing Information Systems

W. T. F. Goossen
1   Leeuwarden Polytechnic, School of Nursing, Leeuwarden
,
P. J. M. M. Epping
2   Leidse Hogeschool, Leiden
,
I. L. Abraham
3   Rijksuniversiteit Groningen, The Netherlands
4   University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA
5   Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Belgium
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
14 February 2018 (online)

    Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

The development of nursing information systems (NIS) is often hampered by the fact that nursing lacks a unified nursing terminology and classification system. Currently there exist various initiatives in this area. We address the question as to how current initiatives in the development of nursing terminology and classification systems can contribute towards the development of NIS. First, the rationale behind the formalization of nursing knowledge is discussed. Next, using a framework for nursing information processing, the most important developments in the field of nursing on formalization, terminology and classification are critically reviewed. The initiatives discussed include nursing terminology projects in several countries, and the International Classification of Nursing Practice. Suggestions for further developments in the area are discussed. Finally, implications for NIS are presented, as well as the relationships of these components to other sections of an integrated computerized patient record.

Keywords

Nursing Informatics - Nursing Records - Nursing Information Systems - Medical Records - Classification and Coding
 

  • REFERENCES

  • 1 Zielstorff RD, Hudgings CI, Grobe SJ. Next-Generation Nursing Information Systems, Essential Characteristics for Professional Practice. Washington DC: American Nurses Publishing; 1993
    Google Scholar
  • 2 Delaney C, Mehmert PA, Prophet C, Rose Bellinger SL, Gardner Huber D, Ellerbe S. Standardized nursing language for healthcare information systems. J Med Syst 1992; 16: 145-59.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Hays BJ, Norris J, Martin KS, Androwich I. Informatics issues for nursing’s future. ANS Adv Nurs Sci 1994; 16: 71-81.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 McCormick KA, Lang N, Zielstorff R, Milholland K, Saba V, Jacox A. Towards standard classification schemes for nursing language: recommendations of the American Nurses Association Steering Committee on Databases to Support Clinical Nursing Practice. J Am Med Inform Assoc 1994; 1: 421-7.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Henry SB, Holzemer WL, Reilly CA, Campbell KE. Terms used by nurse to describe patient problems. J Am Med Inform Assoc 1994; 1: 61-74.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 International Council of Nurses. Nursing’s Next Advance: An International Classification for Nursing Practice (ICNP). Geneva: ICN Headquarters; 1993
    Google Scholar
  • 7 Clark J, Lang NM. Nursing next advance: an International Classification for Nursing Practice. Int Nurs Rev 1992; 39: 109-12.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 WCC. Begrippenkader Verpleegkunde. Uniformering, Classificatie, Standaardisatie (in Dutch). Report of WCC Working Conference 1993 Zoetermeer: National Health Council; 1993
    Google Scholar
  • 9 Gordon M. Practice-based data set for a nursing information system. J Med Syst 1985; 9: 43-55.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Werley HH, Devine EC, Zorn CR. The Nursing Minimum Data Set: effort to standardize collection of essential nursing data. In: Ball MJ, Hannah KJ, Gerdin-Jelger U, Peterson H. eds Nursing Informatics, where Caring and Technology Meet. New York: Springer Verlag; 1988: 160-7.
    Google Scholar
  • 11 Goossen WTF. Verpleegkundige Informatiekunde. Een noodzakelijke intermediair tussen verpleegkunde en informatica? (in Dutch). Tijdschrift voor Medische Informatica 1992; 21: 9-17.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Goossen WTF. Nursing information management and processing: a framework and definition for systems analysis, design and evaluation. Intern J Bio-Med Comput. 1996 (in press).
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Hyslop A. Formalising nursing knowledge: translating nurses describing and thinking about their patients. In: Wainwright P. ed Nursing Informatics. London: Churchill Livingstone; 1994: 41-70.
    Google Scholar
  • 14 Tanner CA, Padrick KP, Westfall UE, Putzier DJ. Diagnostic reasoning strategies of nurses and nursing students. Nurs Res 1987; 36: 358-63.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 McCormick KA. A Unified Nursing Language System. In: Ball MJ, Hannah KJ, Gerdin-Jelger U, Peterson H. eds Nursing Informatics, Where Caring and Technology Meet. New York: Springer Verlag; 1988: 168-78.
    Google Scholar
  • 16 Bulechek GM. Nursing diagnoses: An international language. Recent Advances in Nursing 1988; 21: 135-43.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Grobe SJ. Nursing intervention and taxonomy study: language and classification methods. ANS Adv Nurs Sci 1990; 13: 22-33.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Saba VK, Zuckerman AE. A home health classification system. In: Lun KC. et al., eds MEDINFO 92. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science Publ; 1992: 334-48.
    Google Scholar
  • 19 McCloskey JC, Bulechek GM. Nursing Interventions Classification by the Iowa Intervention Project. St. Louis: Mosby-Yearbook; 1992
    Google Scholar
  • 20 Mortenson R, Mantas J, Manuela M, Sermeus W, Nielsen GH, McAvinue E. Telematics for health care in the European Union. In: Grobe SJ, Pluyter ESP. eds Nursing Informatics. An International Overview for Nursing in a Technological Era. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science Publ; 1994: 750-2.
    Google Scholar
  • 21 Barnett DE. Nursing terms project launch. Inform Technol Nursing 1993; 5: 5-7.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Van de Bruggen H, Hirs W. Het vooronderzoek begrippenkader verpleegkunde (in Dutch). Tijdschrift voor de Ziekenverpleging 1993; 103: 267-71.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Goossen WTF, Smulders J. A knowledge based system for nursing care planning. In: Grobe SJ, Pluyter ESP. eds Nursing Informatics: An International Overview for Nursing in a Technological Era. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science Publ; 1994: 294-8.
    Google Scholar
  • 24 Guzzetta CE, Bunton SD, Prinkley LA, Sherer AP, Seifert PC. Clinical Assessment Tools for Use with Nursing Diagnoses. St. Louis: The CV Mosby Company; 1989
    Google Scholar
  • 25 Hoy D. Information systems to support clinical nursing. In: Third European Summer School of Nursing Informatics. Genk; Belgium: 1993
    Google Scholar
  • 26 Tanghe A, Croes L, Delesie L, Sermeus W, Vanden Boer G, Vanlanduyt J. Minimale Verpleegkundige Gegevens (M.V.G.) (in Dutch). Verpleegkundigen en Gemeenschapszorg 1991; 47: 73-80.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Vooronderzoek Eenduidig Verpleegkundig Begrippenkader (in Dutch). Zoetermeer: National Health Council; 1993
    Google Scholar
  • 28 Graves JR, Corcoran S. The study of nursing informatics. IMAGE: Journal of Nursing Scholarship 1989; 21: 227-31.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Brennan PF. Nursing knowledge and knowledge-based systems. In: Third European Summer School on Nursing Informatics. Genk; Belgium: 1993
    Google Scholar
  • 30 Carper B. Fundamental patterns of knowing in nursing. ANS Adv Nurs Sci 1978; 1: 13-24.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 31 Abraham IL, Fitzpatrick JJ. Knowing for nursing practice: patterns of knowledge and their emulation in expert systems. In: Proceedings of the Eleventh Symposium on Computer Applications in Medical Care. IOS Angeles, CA: IEEE Computer Society Press; 1987: 88-92.
    Google Scholar
  • 32 Goossen WTF. Integratie van de informatie-voorziening op de intensive care. knelpunten en mogelijke oplossingen (in Dutch). Intensive Care Review 1993; 8: 10-6.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 33 Currell RA. Models for nursing – the paradox of business activity modelling. In: Lun KC. et al., eds MEDINFO 92. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science Publ; 1992: 964-9.
    Google Scholar
  • 34 Schreiber G, Van Heijst G, Post W. GAMES-II, a Generalised Architecture for Medical Knowledge-based System. Tijdschrift voor Medische Informatica 1993; 22: 209-14.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 35 Rubens R. Florence Nightingale, grondlegster van de verpleegkunde. Haar verbondenheid met Quetelet en het wetenschappelijk denken (in Dutch). Geschiedenis der Geneeskunde 1993; 1: 56-64.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 36 Wake MM, Murphy M, Affara FA, Clark J, Lang NM, Mortensen R. Toward an international classification for nursing practice: A literature review and survey. Int Nurs Rev 1993; 40: 77-80.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 37 Ozbolt JG, Graves JR. Clinical nursing informatics. Nurs Clin North Am 1993; 28: 407-25.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 38 Evers GCM. Verpleegkundige Registratie (in Dutch). Leuven Universitaire Pers; 1993
    Google Scholar
  • 39 Ehnfors M, Thorell-Ekstrand I, Ehrenberg A. Towards basic nursing information in patient records. Vard I Norden 1991; 21: 12-31.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 40 NHS Centre for Coding and Classification. Nursing, Midwifery and Health Visiting Terms Project. Loughborough: National Health Service Centre for Coding and Classification; 1993
    Google Scholar
  • 41 Casey A. Nursing, Midwifery and Health Visiting Terms Project. In: Grobe SJ, Pluyter ESP. eds In: Nursing Informatics: An international overview for Nursing in a Technological Era. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science Publ; 1994: 639-42.
    Google Scholar
  • 42 Fawcett J. Analysis and Evaluation of Conceptual Models of Nursing. Philadelphia: Davis Camp; 1989
    Google Scholar
  • 43 Gordon M. Nursing Diagnosis and the diagnostic process. Am J Nurs 1976; 76: 1298.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 44 Gordon M. Nursing Diagnosis: Process and Application. New York: McGraw Hill; 1994
    Google Scholar
  • 45 Leih P, Salentijn C. Verpleegkundige diagnoses. Betekenis, classificatie en vragen (in Dutch). Verpleegkunde 1991; 6: 3-10.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 46 Abraham IL. Diagnostic discrepancy and clinical inference: A social-cognitive analysis. In: Genetic, Social, and General Psychology Monographs 1986; 112: 41-102.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 47 Abraham IL. Issues in the application of artificially intelligent decision support technology to nursing diagnosis. In: Hannah K. et al., eds Clinical Judgement and Decision Making: the Future of Nursing Diagnosis. New York: Wiley; 1987: 510-27.
    Google Scholar
  • 48 Hamers JPH, Huijer Abu Saad H, Halfens RJG. Diagnostic process and decision making in nursing: A literature review. J Prof Nurs 1994; 10: 154-63.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 49 Benner P. From novice to expert. Am J Nurs 1982; 82: 402-7.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 50 Woolery L. Expert nurses and expert systems. Research and development issues. Comput Nurs 1990; 8: 23-8.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 51 Delesie L, Sermeus W, Vanden Boer G, Vanlanduyt J. Identifying the hospitals’ practice variations. In: New Trends in Hospital Management. Leuven: Centre for Health Services Research, Catholic University Leuven; 1992: 41-72.
    Google Scholar
  • 52 Grobe SJ, Hughes LC. The conceptual validity of a taxonomy of nursing interventions. J Adv Nursing 1993; 18: 1942-61.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 53 Halttunen A. The nomenclature of nursing interventions, a national project in Finland. In: Lun KC. et al., eds MEDINFO 92. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science Publ; 1992: 993-5.
    Google Scholar
  • 54 Martin KS, Scheet NJ. The Omaha System: A community health nursing data management model. In: Lun KC. et al., eds MEDINFO 92. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science Publ; 1992: 1036-40.
    Google Scholar
  • 55 Martin KS, Scheet NJ. Horne health clients: characteristics, outcomes of care, and nursing interventions. Am J Public Health 1993; 83: 1730-4.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 56 Lang NM, Marek KD. The classification of patient outcomes. J Prof Nurs 1990; 6: 158-63.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 57 Marek KD, Lang NM. Nursing sensitive outcomes. In: Nursing Minimum Data Set Conference. Edmonton Alberta: Canadian Nurses Association; 1992: 100-11.
    Google Scholar
  • 58 Consensus Verpleegkundige Verslaglegging (in Dutch). Utrecht: Verpleegkundig Wetenschappelijke Raad van het Centraal Begeleidingsorgaan voor de Intercollegiale Toetsing; 1992
    Google Scholar
  • 59 Tange H, Donkers HHLM, Hasman A. Structuring data in medical records. In: Chytil MK, Duru G, Van Eimeren W, Fagle ChD. eds Fifth International Conference on System Science in Health Care. Prague: Omnipress Publ; 1992: 1372-5.
    Google Scholar
  • 60 Vandewal D, Vanden Boer G. Using NMDS-Information for the allocation of budgets to nursing units. In: Grobe SJ, Pluyter ESP. eds Nursing Informatics: An International Overview for Nursing in a Technological Era. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science Publ; 1994: 129-33.
    Google Scholar
  • 61 Walker DC. et al Internationalization of health care terminology. In: MEDINFO 92. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science Publ; 1992: 1444-51.
    Google Scholar
  • 62 CEN/TC 251. Medical Informatics, Categorical Structures of Concepts, Model for Representation of Semantics. Draft Report # 95-087 Gent, Belgium: Institut Beige de Normalisation/Belgisch Normalisatie Instituut; 1995
    Google Scholar
  • 63 Clark J. An international classification for nursing practice. In: Proceedings of a Post-conference on Informatics: the Infrastructure for Quality Assessment and Improvement in Nursing. Austin, Texas: 1994
    Google Scholar
  • 64 International Council of Nurses. Guidelines for Submitting Labels to the International Classification for Nursing Practice (ICNP). Geneva: ICN Headquarters; 1994
    Google Scholar
  • 65 Andolina KM. The automation of critical path/CareMap (R) systems. In: Ball MJ, Hannah KJ, Newbold SK, Douglas JV. eds Nursing Informatics, where Caring and Technology Meet. 2nd ed.. New York: Springer Verlag; 1995: 167-83.
    Google Scholar