Virtual Rehabilitation – Benefits and Challenges^[*]

Summary

Objectives: To discuss the advantages and disadvantages of rehabilitation applications of virtual reality.

Methods: VR can be used as an enhancement to conventional therapy for patients with conditions ranging from musculo-skeletal problems, to stroke-induced paralysis, to cognitive deficits. This approach is called “VR-augmented rehabilitation.” Alternately, VR can replace conventional interventions altogether, in which case the rehabilitation is “VR-based.” If the intervention is done at a distance, then it is called “telerehabilitation.” Simulation exercises for post-stroke patients have been developed using a “teacher object” approach or a video game approach. Simulations for musculo-skeletal patients use virtual replicas of rehabilitation devices (such as rubber ball, power putty, peg board). Phobia-inducing virtual environments are prescribed for patients with cognitive deficits.

Results: VR-augmented rehabilitation has been shown effective for stroke patients in the chronic phase of the disease. VR-based rehabilitation has been improving patients with fear of flying, Vietnam syndrome, fear of heights, and chronic stroke patients. Telerehabilitation interventions using VR have improved musculo-skeletal and post-stroke patients, however less data is available at this time.

Conclusions: Virtual reality presents significant advantages when applied to rehabilitation of patients with varied conditions. These advantages include patient motivation, adaptability and variability based on patient baseline, transparent data storage, online remote data access, economy of scale, reduced medical costs. Challenges in VR use for rehabilitation relate to lack of computer skills on the part of therapists, lack of support infrastructure, expensive equipment (initially), inadequate communication infrastructure (for telerehabilitation in rural areas), and patient safety concerns.

Keywords

VR-based rehabilitation - VR-augmented rehabilitation - telerehabilitation - cognitive rehabilitation - post-stroke rehabilitation

^* Updated version of an invited review that appeared in Haux, R., Kullikowski, E. (eds), (2003), IMIA Yearbook of Medical Informatics 2003; Quality of Health Care: the Role of Informatics, pp. 170-6, Stuttgart: Schattauer

• References

• 1 American Association of Orthopedic Surgeons,. “Broken Ankle”,. 2002 Also at orthoinfo.aaos.org.
• 2 Americam Stroke Association,. “Impact of Stroke,’’. 2002 Also at www.strokeassociation.org.
• 3 North M, North S, Coble J. Virtual Reality Therapy: An Effective Treatment for Psychological Disorders, chapter 51. In: Stanney K. (ed.) The Handbook of Virtual Environments Technology (HVET),. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc; 2002. pp. 1065-78.
• 4 Holden M, Todorov E. Use of Virtual Environments in MotorLearning and Rehabilitation, chapter 49. In: Stanney K. (Ed.) The Handbook of Virtual Environments Technology (HVET),. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc; 2002. pp. 999-1026.
• 5 Boian R, Sharma A, Han C, Burdea G, Merians A, Adamovich S, Recce M, Tremaine M, Poizner H. Virtual Reality-Based Post-Stroke Hand Rehabilitation, Proceedings of Medicine Meets Virtual Reality 2002,. IOS Press; pp. 64-70, Newport Beach CA: January 23-26, 2002
• 6 Holden MK, Dyar TA, Schwamm L, Bizzi E. Home-Based Telerehabilitation Using a Virtual Environment System. Proceedings of the Second International Workshop on Virtual Rehabilitation, Piscataway, New Jersey: 2003. pp. 4-12.
• 7 Piron L, Tonin P, Atzori A, Trivello E, Mauro D. A Virtual-Reality based motor telerehabilitation system. Proceedings of the Second International Workshop on Virtual Rehabilitation, Piscataway, New Jersey: 2003. pp. 21-26.
• 8 National Rural Health Association,. Legislative and Regulatory Agenda,. NRHA e-News; Washington DC: vol. 2(3), 1999. www.nrharural.org.
• 9 Popescu V, Burdea G, Bouzit M, Girone M, Hentz V. Orthopedic Telerehabilitation with Virtual Force Feedback,. IEEE Transactions on Information Technology in Biomedicine, vol. 4, No. 1, 2000; 04 (Suppl. 01) 45-51.
• 10 Dhurjaty S. Challenges of Telerehabilitation in the Home Environment, Proceedings of State of the Science Conference on Telerehabilitation and Applications of Virtual Reality,. Washington DC: October 2001. pp. 89-93.
• 11 Buckley K, Prandon C, Tran B. Nursing Management and the Acceptance/Use of Telehealth Technologies by Caregivers of Stroke Patients in the Home Setting, Proceedings of State of the Science Conference on Telerehabilitation and Applications of Virtual Reality,. Washington DC: October 2001. pp. 35-8.
• 12 Hodges L, Anderson P, Burdea G, Hoffman H, Rothbaum B. Treating Psychological and Physical Disorders with VR,. IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications, invited article; November/December 2001. pp. 25-33.
• 13 Emory Health Sciences.. “Virtual Reality Therapy Proven Effective to Combat Fear of Flying,”. Press Release; December 18, 2000. www.emory.edu
• 14 Rizzo A, Schultheis M, Kerns K, Mateer C. Analysis of Assets for Virtual Reality Applications in Neuropsychology,. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation (in press).;