ICT in Health Care: Sociotechnical Approaches

Summary

The importance of the social sciences for medical informatics is increasingly recognized. As ICT requires interaction with people and thereby inevitably affects them, understanding ICT requires a focus on the interrelation between technology and its social environment. Socio-technical approaches increase our understanding of how ICT applications are developed, introduced and become a part of social practices. Sociotechnical approaches share several starting points: 1) they see health care work as a social, ‘real life’ phenomenon, which may seem ‘messy’ at first, but which is guided by a practical rationality that can only be overlooked at a high price (i.e. failed systems). 2) They see technological innovation as a social process, in which organizations are deeply affected. 3) Through in-depth, formative evaluation, they can help improve system design and implementation.

• References

• 1 Kaplan B. Addressing organizational issues into the evaluation of medical systems. J Am Med Inform Assoc 1997; 4: 94-101.
• 2 Lorenzi NM, Riley RT, Blyth AJC, Southon G, Dixon BJ. Antecedents of the people and organizational aspects of medical informatics, review of the literature. J Am Med Inform Assoc 1997; 4: 79-93.
• 3 Mumford E, Weir M. Computer systems in work design: the ETHICS method. New York: John Wiley; 1979
• 4 Friedman A, Comford DS. Computer systems development, history, organization and implementation. New York: Wiley; 1989
• 5 Bijker WE, Law J. Shaping technology – building society, studies in sociotechnical Change. Cambridge (MA): MIT Press; 1992
• 6 Callon M, Law J. On the construction of socio-technical networks, content and context revisited. Knowledge and Society 1989; 8: 57-83.
• 7 Feldman SE, Roblin DW. Medical accidents in hospital care: applications of failure analysis to hospital quality appraisal. Jt Comm J Qual Improv; 1997; 23: 567-80.
• 8 Perrow C. Normal accidents, living with high risk technologies. New York: Basic Books; 1984
• 9 Randell R. Medicine and aviation, a review of the comparison. Meth Inf Med 2003; 42: 433-6.
• 10 Schmidt K, Bannon L. Taking CSCW seriously, supporting articulation work. Comp Supp Coop Work 1992; 1: 7-40.
• 11 Bowker GC, Star SL, Turner W, Gasser L. Social science, technical systems, and cooperative work, beyond the great divide. Mahwah (NJ): Lawrence Erlbaum; 1997
• 12 Greenbaum J, Kyng M. Design at work: cooperative design for computer systems. Hillsdale (NJ): Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 1991
• 13 Asaro PM. Transforming society by transforming technology, the science and politics of participatory design. Acc Man Inf Techn 1996; 10: 257-90.
• 14 Kling R, Scacchi W. The web of computing, computer technology as social organization. Advances in Computers 1982; 21: 1-90.
• 15 Baskerville R, Stage J, DeGross JI. editors. Organizational and social perspectives on information technology, IFIP TC8 WG8.2 international working conference on the social and organizational perspective on research and practice in information technology, June 9-11, 2000, Aalborg, Denmark. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers; 2000
• 16 Berg M. Patient care information systems and healthcare work, a socio-technical approach. Int J Med Inf 1999; 55: 87-101.
• 17 Kuhn KA, Giuse DA. From hospital information systems to health information systems, problems, challenges, perspectives. Meth Inf Med 2001; 40: 275-87.
• 18 Aarts J, Peel V, Wright G. Organizational issues in health informatics, a model approach. Int J Med Inf 1998; 52: 235-42.
• 19 Berg M. Medical work and the computer-based patient record, a sociological perspective. Meth Inf Med 1998; 37: 294-301.
• 20 Gorman PN, Lavelle M, Ash JS. Order creation and communication in health care. Meth Inf Med 2003; 42: 376-83.
• 21 Hughes D. When nurse knows best. Some aspects of nurse/doctor interaction in a casualty department. Sociology of Health and Illness 1988; 10: 1-22.
• 22 Aanestad M, Edwin B, Mårvik R. Medical image quality as a socio-technical phenomenon. Meth Inf Med 2003; 42: 302-6.
• 23 Garfinkel H. Studies in ethnomethodology. Englewood-Cliffs (NJ): Prentice-Hall; 1967
• 24 De Lusignan S, Wells SE, Hague NJ, Thiru K. Managers see the problems associated with coding clinical data as a technical issue whilst clinicians also see cultural barriers. Meth Inf Med 2003; 42: 416-22.
• 25 van der Lei J. Use and abuse of computer-stored medical records [editorial]. Meth Inf Med 1991; 30: 79-80.
• 26 Winthereik BR. “We fill in our working understanding”: on codes, classifications and the production of accurate data. Meth Inf Med 2003; 42: 489-96.
• 27 Hutchins E. Cognition in the wild. Cambridge (MA): MIT Press; 1995
• 28 Bång M, Timpka T. Cognitive tools in medical teamwork, the spatial arrangement of patient records. Meth Inf Med 2003; 42: 331-6.
• 29 Nygren E, Henriksson P. Reading the medical record, analysis of physicians’ ways of reading the medical record. Comput Methods Programs Biomed 1992; 39: 1-12.
• 30 Clarke K, Hartswood M, Procter R, Rounce-field M, Slack R. Trusting the record. Meth Inf Med 2003; 42: 345-52.
• 31 Ash JS, Gorman PN, Lavelle M. et al. Perceptions of physician order entry, results of a cross-site qualitative Study. Meth Inf Med 2003; 42: 313-23.
• 32 Reddy M, Pratt W, Dourish P, Shabot MM. Sociotechnical requirements analysis for clinical systems. Meth Inf Med 2003; 42: 437-44.
• 33 Berg M. Search for Synergy: Interrelating Medical Work and Patient Care Information Systems. Meth Inf Med 2003; 42: 337-44.
• 34 Coiera E. Mediated interaction design. Int J Med Inf. forthcoming.
• 35 Orlikowski WJ, Walsham G, Jones MR, DeGross JI. editors. Information technology and changes in organizational work, proceedings of the IFIP WG8.2 working conference on information technology and changes in organizational work, December 1995. London: Chapman & Hall; 1996
• 36 Dardelet B, Darcy S. Rescuing the emergency, multiple expertise and IT in the emergency field. Meth Inf Med 2003; 42: 360-5.
• 37 Sicotte C, Lehoux P. Teleconsultation, rejected and emerging uses. Meth Inf Med 2003; 42: 451-7.
• 38 Jones MR. ”Computers can land people on Mars, why can‘t they get them to work in a hospital?” Implementation of an electronic patient record system in a UK hospital. Meth Inf Med 2003; 42: 410-5.
• 39 Van der Ploeg I. Positioning the patient: normative analysis of electronic patient records. Meth Inf Med 2003; 42: 477-81.
• 40 Adams S, de Bont AA. Notions of reliability, considering the importance of difference in guiding patients to health care web sites. Meth Inf Med 2003; 42: 307-12.
• 41 Faber M. User involvement in the design and introduction of an electronic patient record, a precarious balance. Meth Inf Med 2003; 42: 371-5.
• 42 Stricklin M-L. Point of care technology, a sociotechnical approach to home health implementation. Meth Inf Med 2003; 42: 463-70.
• 43 Balka E. Getting the Big Picture: The macro-politics of information system development (and failure) in a Canadian hospital. Meth Inf Med 2003; 42: 324-30.
• 44 Novek J. IT, gender, and professional practice, or, why an automated drug distribution system was sent back to the manufacturer. Sci Techn Hum Val: 2002; 27: 379-403.
• 45 Timmons S. Resistance to computerised care planning systems by qualified nurses working in the UK NHS. Meth Inf Med 2003; 42: 471-6.
• 46 Latour B. Aramis, or the love of technology. Cambridge (MA): Harvard University Press; 1996
• 47 Ellingsen G, Monteiro E. Big is Beautiful: electronic patient records in large Norwegian hospitals 1980s-2001. Meth Inf Med 2003; 42: 366-70.
• 48 Hyysalo S, Lehenkari J. An activity-theoretical method for studying user participation in IS design. Meth Inf Med 2003; 42: 398-404.
• 49 Hartswood M, Procter R, Rouchy P, Rounce-field M, Slack R, Voss A. Working IT out in medical practice, IT systems design and development as co-realization. Meth Inf Med 2003; 42: 392-7.
• 50 Markussen R. Dilemmas in Cooperative Design. In: Trigg R, Anderson SI, Dykstra-Erickson E. editors. PDC‘94, Proceedings of the Participatory Design Conference. Palo Alto (CA): Computer Professionals for Social Responsibility; 1994
• 51 Berg M. Implementing Information Systems in Health Care Organizations: Myths and Challenges. Int J Med Inf 2001; 64: 143-56.
• 52 Ciborra CU, Braa K, Cordella A. et al. From control to drift, the dynamics of corporate information infrastructures. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2000
• 53 Hanseth O, Aanestad M. Design as bootstrapping, on the evolution of ICT solutions in health care. Meth Inf Med 2003; 42: 384-91.
• 54 Monteiro E. Integrating health information systems: a critical approach. Meth Inf Med 2003; 42: 428-32.
• 55 Ellingsen G, Monteiro E. A patchwork planet. Integration and cooperation in hospitals. Comp Supp Coop Work.;
• 56 Sauer C. Why Information Systems Fail:A Case Study Approach. Henley-on-Thames: Alfred Waller; 1993
• 57 van der Meijden MJ, Solen I, Hasman A, Troost J, Tange HJ. Two patient care information systems in the same hospital: beyond technical aspects. Meth Inf Med 2003; 42: 423-7.
• 58 Stoop A, Berg M. Integrating quantitative and qualitative methods in patient care information system evaluation, guidance for the organizational decision maker. Meth Inf Med 2003; 42: 458-62.
• 59 Kaplan B. Organizational evaluation of medical information resources. In: Friedman CP, Wyatt JC. editors Evaluation methods in medical informatics. New York: Springer-Verlag; 1997. pp. 255-80.