Retrieval-Oriented Design of Clinical Research Forms

Abstract:

Computerized clinical forms are subject to a wide variety of different requirements. They have to allow detailed documentation and must be user-friendly. State-of-the-art applications for design permit clinicians themselves to create their own forms as needed, with the various variables presented in different ways depending on their intended use. Often, however, only aspects of clinical documentation are considered, with no thought being given to subsequent data retrieval. This article presents guidelines for the retrieval-oriented design of clinical forms. It discusses where anticipatory measures for structuring forms are easier to accomplish than complex data linkage at the time of retrieval and analysis.

Keywords:

Interface Design - Clinical Research Forms - Form Production - Retrievability

• REFERENCES

• 1 Shneiderman B. Designing the User Interface. Reading, Mass: Addison-Wesley; 1992
• 2 Laurel B. The art of human-computer interface design. Reading, Mass: Addison-Wesley; 1999
• 3 Edmonds E. Human-computer interface evaluation: not user-friendliness but design for operation. Med Inform 1990; 15 (Suppl. 03) 253-60.
• 4 Williams JG, Morgan JM. The clinician-information interface. Proceedings Medinfo. 1995: 801-5.
• 5 van Ginneken AM, de Wilde M, van Mulligen EM, Stam H. Can data representation and interface demands be reconciled?. Approach in ORCA. Proc AMIA Symp. 1997: 779-83.
• 6 van Mulligen EM, Stam H, van Ginneken AM. Clinical data entry. Proc AMIA Symp. 1998: 81-5.
• 7 Boralv E, Goransson B, Olsson E, Sandblad B. Usability and efficiency. The HELIOS approach to development of user interfaces. Comput Methods Programs Biomed 1994; 45: 47-64.
• 8 Aisaka K, Tsutsui K, Murakami Y. et al. User interface design and evaluation for electronic medical record system. Proceedings Medinfo. 1995: 781-4.
• 9 Marin R, Taboada M, Mira J, Barreiro A, Otero RP. Design and integration of a graphic interface for an expert system in oncology. Int J Biomed Comput 1993; 33 (Suppl. 01) 25-43.
• 10 van Ginneken AM, Stam H, van Mulligen EM, de Wilde M, van Mastrigt R, van Bemmel JH. ORCA: the versatile CPR. Methods of Information in Medicine 1999; 38 4-5 332-8.
• 11 Nadkarni PM. QAV: Querying entity-attribute-value metadata in a biomedical database. Comput Methods Programs Biomed 1997; 53 (Suppl. 02) 93-103.
• 12 Dorda W, Wrba T, Duftschmid G. et al. ArchiMed – A Medical Information- and Retrieval System. Methods of Information in Medicine 1999; 38: 16-24.
• 13 Singer SW, Meinert CL. Format-independent data collection forms. Control Clin Trials 1995; 16 (Suppl. 06) 363-76.
• 14 Canfield K, Silva M, Zhaohui S, Manchanda R, Abbott P. Transforms of the computerized patient record data model: from transactions to analytical processing. Proceedings Annu Symp Comput Appl Med Care. 1995: 343-6.
• 15 Gall W, Sachs P, Duftschmid G, Dorda W. A Retrieval System for the Selection and Statistical Analysis of Clinical Data. Medical Inf 1999; 24: 201-12.
• 16 Pisanelli DM, Ricci FL. Patient records: from single events to elements for health planning. Methods of Information in Medicine 1994; 33 (Suppl. 05) 473-8.
• 17 Tansel A, Clifford J, Gadia S, Jajodia S, Segev A, Snodgrass R. eds. Temporal Databases: Theory, Design and Implementation. Benjamin/Cummings: 1993
• 18 Grabner G. WAMIS – Wiener allgemeines medizinisches Informations-System. Berlin: Springer; 1985
• 19 Laminger B, Dorda W, Reichetzeder C. WAMASTAT – ein System zur Benutzerführung bei der Auswertung klinischer Studien. EDV in Medizin und Biologie 1986; 17 1/2 1-5.
• 20 Patel VL, Kushniruk AW. Interface design for health care environments: the role of cognitive science. Proc AMIA Symp. 1998: 29-37.
• 21 Safran C, Chute CG. Exploration and exploitation of clinical databases. Int J BioMed Comput 1995; 39: 151-6.