Implementation of Health Information Systems in Romania

Summary

Objectives: The paper aimed to present and analyze the development of Healthcare Information Systems in Romania during the last decade. The first part was dedicated to the analysis of a large national project, HMIS – Healthcare Management Information System, and the second to the current state of the hospital information systems and primary care systems.

Methods: The approach of a “case study” was used. The description of the HMIS project comprised the objectives and its structure, implementation, results and lessons learned. This is followed by a classical short presentation of the current state at the hospital and primary care levels.

Results: The very modest results of the HMIS project were critically analyzed, listing the ‘failure factors’ at various moments, both weak points of the project as well as the consequences of the structural-organizational changes within the Romanian healthcare system during the implementation. However, mainly positive results were registered in the last years at lower levels, hospitals and primary care, which can also partially be interpreted as ‘lesson learned’.

Conclusions: There are several things to be learned from the Romanian experience. Healthcare information system analysis is quite complex. Obtaining better results requires several additional measures including better education and training, adopting standards and appropriate quality assessment tools.

Keywords

Healthcare information systems - system analysis - hospital information system - primary care systems

• References

• 1 Mihalas GI, Bazavan M. Current Trends in Medical Informatics in Romania. Br J Healthcare Comput Info Manage 2002; 19 (10) 26-8.
• 2 Hammon GL. Understanding the Purchasing and Installation Process. In: Ball MJ, Douglas JV, O’Desky RI, Albright JW. Healthcare Information Management Systems. New York:: Springer Verlag; 1991: 337-44.
• 3 Farcas DD. Remarks Concerning the Romanian Health Management Information System Project. In: Mihalas GI, Enatescu V, Roz MA. MEDINF ’98. Arad:: Vasile Goldis Univ. Press; 1999: 11-6.
• 4 Neame R. Review of Progress with Romanian First Health Project and Preliminary Planning for the Scope and Focus of a Projected Romanian Second Health Project. HIC Ltd. 1999; 1-33.
• 5 Domsa D. Implementation of HMIS information system in Neamt District. In: Mihalas GI, Engelbrecht R, Bazavan M, Hofdijk J, Naszlady A. Healthcare Telematics Support in Transition Countries. Timisoara:: Eurobit Pub Co; 2002: 20-2.
• 6 Mihalas GI. IT Role in Healthcare Reform in Transition Countries. In: Mihalas GI, Engelbrecht R, Bazavan M, Hofdijk J, Naszlady A. Healthcare Telematics Support in Transition Countries. Timisoara:: Eurobit Pub Co; 2002: 1-2.
• 7 Bazavan M, Cioaca C, Stefanescu S, Simionescu C. The Need for Health Informatics Standards. In: Mihalas GI, Lungeanu D. Trends in Romanian e-Health. Timisoara:: Eurobit Pub Co; 2003: 60-2.
• 8 www.infoworld.ro/produse_en.html (as in Dec. 11, 2004)
• 9 www.ici.ro/ici/portofoliu/pr-elias-his.html (as in Dec. 11, 2004)
• 10 www.sbs.siemens.ro/ro/ref-diasan.html (as in Dec. 11, 2004)
• 11 Stoicu-Tivadar L, Stoicu-Tivadar V, Marginean M, Berian D. A Strategy for System Improvement and Data Processing in a National GP Sentinel Network. In: Baud R, Fieschi M, Le Beux P, Ruch P. The New Navigators: from Professionals to Patients. Amsterdam:: IOS Press; 2003: 874-9.
• 12 Johnston T. Supporting a healthy transition: lessons from early World Bank experience in Eastern Europe. Washington DC:: World Bank; 2002 www.worldbank.org/oed;“eca_health_wp”in“searchOED”