Research Opportunities and Challenges in 2005

D. A. B. Lindberg

doi:10.1055/s-0038-1633998

Methods of Information in Medicine, Table of Contents

Methods Inf Med 2005; 44(04): 483-486
DOI: 10.1055/s-0038-1633998

Editorial

Schattauer GmbH

Research Opportunities and Challenges in 2005

Authors

D. A. B. Lindberg

¹National Library of Medicine, Bethesda, Maryland, USA

Abstract

Summary

Objectives: Biomedical informatics practice and research have become so broad that I will comment on only three areas. These are the electronic health record; prospective population studies; and interactive publications.

Methods: Review of the literature, Internet resources and material and reports generated by internal and external research projects.

Results: Development of an electronic health record continues to be problematic in the U.S. A number of large-scale prospective cohort studies of normal populations are now actively occurring or in planning stages in a number of countries; these present special research opportunities in biomedical informatics. Although there are engineering challenges to the implementation of interactive publications, they have the potential to enhance understanding, learning, and memory of scientific and health concepts.

Conclusions: Three areas of bio-medical informatics challenge us and offer interesting and worthy research opportunities. These include the electronic health record, prospective cohort studies, and interactive publications.

Keywords

Literature review - medical informatics - computerized patient record - population surveillance - cohort studies

Full Text

References

References
1 Hammond WE. HL7 – more than a communications standard. Stud Health Technol Inform 2003; 96: 266-71.
2 McDonald CJ. et al LOINC, a universal standard for identifying laboratory observations: a 5-year update. Clin Chem 2003; 49 (04) 624-33.
3 Humphreys BL. et al The Unified Medical Language System: an informatics research collaboration. JAm Med Inform Assoc 1998; 5 (01) 1-11.
4 Lindberg DA, Humphreys BL, McCray AT. The Unified Medical Language System. Methods Inf Med 1993; 32 (04) 281-91.
5 Wang AY. et al The SNOMED clinical terms development process: refinement and analysis of content. Proc AMIA Symp 2002: 845-9.
6 Brown PJ, O’Neil M, Price C. Semantic definition of disorders in version 3 of the Read Codes. Methods Inf Med 1998; 37 (4-5) 415-9.
7 deCODE genetics [Internet]. Reykjavik (Iceland): deCODE; [cited 2004 Nov 23]. Available from http://www.decode.com/
8 Kaiser J. Biobanks. Population databases boom, from Iceland to the U.S. Science 2002; 298 5596 1158-61.
9 UK Biobank [Internet]. Manchester (UK): University of Manchester; [updated 2004 Nov 16; cited 2004 Nov 23]. Available from http://www.ukbiobank.ac.uk/
10 Watanabe S. Large-scale, population-based prospective studies in Japan. Eur J Cancer 1993; 29 a (16) 2305-14.
11 Triendl R. Japan launches controversial Biobank project. Nat Med 2003; 9 (08) 982
12 RIKEN SNP Research Center [Internet]. Yokohama (Japan): RIKEN Yokohama Institute; c2000–2004 [updated 2004 Apr 28; cited 2004 Nov 23]. Available from http://www.src.riken.go.jp/eng/src/project.html
13 Children’s Health Act of 2000. Pub. L. No. 106-310, 42 U.S.C. 201 (2000)
14 National Children’s Study [Internet]. Rockville (MD): National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (US); [cited 2004 Nov 23]. Available from http://nationalchildrensstudy.gov/
15 Collins FS. The case for a US prospective cohort study of genes and environment. Nature 2004; 429 6990 475-7.
16 Sweeney L. Weaving technology and policy together to maintain confidentiality. J Law Med Ethics 1997; 25 (2-3) 98-110. 82
17 Kaiser J. Scientific Publishing. Congress puts similar heat on NIH. Science 2004; 305 5683 458
18 Kaiser J. Scientific publishing. Seeking advice on ‘open access’, NIH gets an earful. Science 2004; 305 5685 764
19 PLoS: Public Library of Science [Internet]. San Francisco: Public Library of Science; [cited 2004 Nov 23]. Available from http://www.plos.org/
20 PubMed Central [Internet]. Bethesda (MD): National Library of Medicine (US); [updated 2004 Jul 6; cited 2004 Nov 23]. Available from http://www.pubmedcentral.gov/
21 DICOM Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine [Internet]. Rosslyn VA. National Elec trical Manufacturers Association (NEMA) [updated 2004 Nov 19, cited 2005 Jan 3]. Available from http://medical.nema.org/
22 Becker J, Cosic D, Märkle S. Managing the multidimensional information space of multimedia documents and dynamic simulations for medical education [Internet]. Berlin (Germany): TU Berlin, Institute of Computer Graphics 1998 [cited 2004 Nov 23]. 5 p. Available from http://cg.cs.tu-berlin.de/papers/1998CAR_MultiIS.pdf
23 Marti V. et al An ODA-based coder/decoder for multimedia medical documents. Proc Annu Symp Comput Appl Med Care. 1993: 849-53.
24 MAVA – Multimedia Document Versatile Architecture [Internet]. Stuttgart (Germany): Universität Stuttgart; [updated 2004 Oct 28; cited 2004 Nov 23]. Available from http://www.ub.unistuttgart.de/ub/mava/envs/mava.phtml
25 Rich Text Format (RTF) version 1.5 specification [Internet]. Alpharetta (GA): CG Information; [cited 2004 Nov 23]. Available from http://www.biblioscape.com/rtf15_spec.htm
26 Bulterman D. The Ambulant Annotator: medical multimedia annotations on tablet PCs. World Conf Elearn Corp Gov Health High Educ [Internet]. 2003 [cited 2004 Nov 23] 2003; (01) 2083-6. Available from http://dl.aace.org/14089
27 National Library of the Netherlands and Elsevier Science make digital preservation history [Internet]. Amsterdam (Netherlands): Elsevier Science; 2002 Aug 20 [cited 2004 Nov 23]. Press release. Available from http://www.kb.nl/hrd/dd/dd_links_en_publicaties/publicaties/eskbpressrelease7_20aug02_def.pdf
28 Laven P. The death of tape? EBU Tech Rev [Internet]. 2003 Apr [cited 2004 Nov 23]; (294): [about 5 p.]. Available from http://www.ebu.ch/trev_294-editorial.html
29 Gray J, Shenoy P. Rules of thumb in data engineering [Internet]. Redmond (WA): Microsoft Corporation 2000 Mar [cited 2004 Nov 23]. (Microsoft technical report; MS-TR-99–100). Available from http://research.microsoft.com/~gray/papers/MS_TR_99_100_Rules_of_Thumb_in_Data_Engineering.pdf
30 Fincke EM, et al. Evaluation of shoulder integrity in space: first report of musculoskeletal US on the International Space Station. Radiology [Internet]. 2004 Nov 8 [cited 2005 Jan 4]; [Epub ahead of print]. Available from http://radiology.rsnajnls/org/cgi/content/full/2342041680v1 to subscribers only
31 Fincke EM. et al Evaluation of shoulder integrity in space: first report of musculoskeletal US on the International Space Station. Radiology 2005; 234 (02) 319-22.