Discussion of “Spatial-Symbolic Query Engine in Anatomy”

Keywords

Spatial relations - anatomy - query processing - ontologies - semantic web

• References

• 1 Puget A, Mejino LV, Detwiler LT, Franklin JD, Brinkley JF. Spatial-symbolic Query Engine in Anatomy. Methods Inf Med 2012; 51 (06) 463-478.
• 2 Handels H, Horsch A, Meinzer HP. Advances in Medical Image Computing. Methods Inf Med 2007; 46 (03) 251-253.
• 3 Handels H, Ehrhardt J. Medical Image Computing for Computer Supported Diagnostics and Thera -py–Advances and Perspectives. Methods Inf Med 2009; 48 (01) 11-17.
• 4 Preim B, Bartz D. Visualization in Medicine. Morgan Kaufmann. 2007
• 5 Forkert N, Schmidt-Richberg A, Fiehler J, Illies T, Möller D, Handels H, Säring D. Fuzzy-based Vascular Structure Enhancement in Time-of-Flight MRA Images for Improved Cerebrovascular Segmentation. Methods Inf Med 2011; 50 (01) 74-78.
• 6 Marschollek M, Teistler M, Bott OJ, Stuermer KM, Pretschner DP, Dresing K. Pre-operative Dynamic Interactive Exploration of Complex Articular Fractures Using a Novel 3D Navigation Tool. Methods Inf Med 2006; 45 (04) 384-388.
• 7 Handels H, Werner R, Schmidt R, Frenzel T, Lu W, Low DA, Ehrhardt J. 4D Medical Image Computing and Visualization of Lung Tumor Mobility in Spatio-temporal CT Image Data. Int J Med Inform 2007; 76 (03) 433-439.
• 8 Höhne K, Pflesser B, Pommert A, Riemer M, Schubert R, Schiemann T, Tiede U, Schuhmacher U. A Realistic Model of Human Structure from the Visible Human Data. Methods Inf Med 2001; 40 (02) 83-89.
• 9 Park JS, Jung Y, Shin DS, Chung MS, Riemer M, Handels H. Generating Useful Images for Medical Applications from the Visible Korean Human. Comp Meth Prog Biomed 2008; 92: 257-266.
• 10 Ehrhardt J, Handels H, Plötz W, Pöppl SJ. Atlas-based Recognition of Anatomical Structures and Landmarks and Automatic Computation of Orthopaedic Parameters to Support the Virtual Planning of Hip Operations. Methods Inf Med 2004; 43: 391-397.
• 11 von Berg J, Lorenz C. A Geometric Model of the Beating Heart. Meth Inf Med 2007; 46 (03) 282-286.
• 12 Heimann T, Wolf I, Meinzer HP. Automatic Generation of 3D Statistical Shape Models with Optimal Landmark Distributions. Methods Inf Med 2007; 46 (03) 282-286.
• 13 Hufnagel H, Ehrhardt J, Pennec X, Ayache N, Handels H. Computation of a Probabilistic Statistical Shape Model in a Maximum-a-posteriori Framework. Methods Inf Med 2009; 48 (04) 314-319.
• 14 Hacker S, Handels H. A Framework for Representation and Visualization of 3D Shape Variations of Organs in an Interactive Anatomical Atlas. Methods Inf Med 2009; 48 (03) 272-281.
• 15 Ackerman MJ. The Visible Human Project: A Resource for Education. Acad Med 1999; 74 (06) 667-670.
• 16 Benson N, Whipple M, Kalet IJ. A Markov Model Approach to Predicting Regional Tumor Spread in the Lymphatic System of the Head and Neck. Proceedings of the American Medical Informatics Association Fall Symposium. In. David W Bates, John H. Holmes and Gilad Kuperman. eds American Medical Informatics Association. 2006: 31-35.
• 17 Paluszynski W, Kalet I. Design Optimization Using Dynamic Evaluation. Proceedings of the Eleventh International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, August 1989, Detroit, Michigan, American Association for Artificial Intelligence. 1989
• 18 Kalet IJ, Paluszynski W. Knowledge-based Computer Systems for Radiotherapy Planning. American Journal of Clinical Oncology 1990; 13: 344-351.
• 19 Ketting C, Austin-Seymour M, Kalet I, Jacky J, Kromhout-Schiro S, Hummel S, Unger J, Fagan L, Griffin T. Automated Planning Target Volume Generation: An Evaluation Pitting a Computer-based Tool Against Human Experts. International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology and Physics 1997; 37 (03) 697-704.
• 20 Chang S-K, Jungert E. Symbolic Projection for Image Information Retrieval and Spatial Reasoning. Academic Press: San Diego; 1996
• 21 Rosse C Mejino JLV. A reference ontology for bioinformatics: the Foundational Model of Anatomy. J Biomed Inform 2003; 36 (06) 478-500.
• 22 DARPA. The Virtual Soldier Project. http://www.virtualsoldier.us/
• 23 Harrison SJ, Feldman J. Perceptual comparison of features within and between objects: a new look. Vision Research 2009; 49: 2790-2799.
• 24 PICITUP. http://www2.picitup.com/
• 25 Google Goggles. www.goggles.com
• 26 Track Id. https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.sonyericsson.trackid&hl=en
• 27 W3C–World Wide Web Consortium. http://www.w3.org/TR/
• 28 Canada Health Infoway. Canada’s next generation of health care at a glance. https://www.infowayinforoute.ca/index.php/resources/infowaycorporate/vision/doc_download/81–2015-canada-s-next-generation-of-health-care-summary
• 29 Australian Health Ministers’ Conference. National eHealth Startegy Autralia, 2008. http://www.nehta.gov.au/component/docman/doc_download/626-national-e-health-strategy-summary-dec08
• 30 Department of Health. The power of information: Putting all of us in control of the health and care information we need, 2012. http://www.dh.gov.uk/prod_consum_dh/groups/dh_digitalassets/@dh/@en/documents/digitalasset/dh_134205.pdf
• 31 WHO-ITU. National eHealth Strategy Toolkit, 2012. http://imianews.wordpress.com/2012/07/16/national-ehealth-strategy-toolkit-from-who-itu/
• 32 Piette JD, Lun KC, Moura Jr LA, Fraser HSF, Mechael PN, Powell J, Khojag SR. Impacts of e-health on the outcomes of care in low- and middle-income countries: where do we go from here?. Bull World Health Organ 2012; 90: 365-372. doi:10.2471/ BLT.11.099069
• 33 Schulz S, Stenzhorn H, Boeker M, Smith B. Strengths and limitations of formal ontologies in the biomedical domain. RECIIS–Electronic Journal in Communication, Information and Innovation in Health, 2009; 3 (01) 31-45. http://dx.doi.org/10.3395/reciis.v3i1.241en
• 34 Smith B, Ceusters W, Klagges B, Köhler J, Kumar A, Lomax J, Mungall C, Neuhaus F, Rector AL, Rosse C. Relations in biomedical ontologies. Genome Biol 2005; 6 (05) R46 Epub 2005 Apr 28
• 35 Herskovits A. Semantics and Pragmatics of Locative Expressions. Cognitive Science 1985; 9: 341-378.
• 36 Gapp K-P. Angle, Distance, Shape, and their Relationship to Projective Relations. In. Moore JD, Lehman JF. (eds) Proc of the 17th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. 1995: 112-117.
• 37 Regier T, Carlson LA. Grounding spatial language in perception: An empirical and computational in -vestigation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 2001; 2 (130) 273-298.