Download PDF
Nervenheilkunde 2006; 25(03): 129-136
DOI: 10.1055/s-0038-1626456
Arbeiten zum Schwerpunkt - Theme Articles
Schattauer GmbH

Zerebral bedingte Paresen und Spastik

Welche Physiotherapie hilft?Cerebrally caused paresis and spasticityWhich kind of physiotherapy is helpful?
S. Freivogel
1   Neurologisches Rehabilitationskrankenhaus für Kinder, Jugendliche und junge Erwachsene, Hegau Jugendwerk GmbH, Gailingen (Ärztlicher Direktor: Dr. A. Voss)
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
19 January 2018 (online)

    Permissions and Reprints

Zusammenfassung

Ziel der physiotherapeutischen Intervention ist die Verbesserung alltagsrelevanter, selbstständiger motorischer Fertigkeiten. Eine evidenzbasierte Therapie zur motorischen Funktionsrestitution beinhaltet die Komponenten Ziel-und Aufgabenorientierung, Repetition und “shaping”. Bei ausgeprägten Paresen sind zusätzlich mentales Training, apparative Verfahren, EMG-initialisierte elektrische Muskelstimulation und eventuell auch Bewegungsbeobachtung und “Spiegeltraining” sinnvoll. Tonuserhöhungen und Muskelverkürzungen im Rahmen der Spastik erfordern auch passive Maßnahmen (Muskeldehnungen, Lagerungen, zirkuläre Gipsverbände, Lagerungsschienen, Fahrrad-Bewegungstrainer). Zur Bewältigung funktioneller Anforderungen müssen Hilfsmittel und/oder Orthesen eingesetzt werden.

Summary

The goal of physiotherapeutic intervention is to improve motor skills relevant for the activities of daily living. An evidence-based therapy for the restitution of motor function has to comprise the components of repetition, shaping, and has to be goal-directed and task orientated. In addition, with severe paresis motor imagery, movement observation and “mirror training” can be helpful as well as mechanistic techniques and EMG triggered electrical stimulation. Increase of muscle tone and muscle shortening due to spasticity require passive strategies such as muscle stretching, positioning, circular casting, splinting, reciprocal movements. For functional requirements devices and orthosis have to be given.

Schlüsselwörter

Physiotherapie - Schlaganfall - Aufgaben-orientiertes Vorgehen - Spastik

Keywords

Physiotherapy - stroke - task orientated approach - spasticity
 

  • Literatur

  • 1 Altschuler EL, Wisdom SB, Stone L, Foster C, Galasko D, Llewelly DM, Ramachandran VS. Rehabilitation of hemiparesis after stroke with a mirror. Lancet 1999; 353: 2035-6.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Basmajian JV, Gowland CA, Finlayson AJ, Hall AL, Swanson LR, Stratford PW, Trotter JE, Brandstater ME. Stroke treatment: comparison of integrated behavioral-physical therapy vs. traditional physical therapy programs. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1987; 68: 267-2.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Binkoski F, Ertelt D, Dettmers C, Buccino G. Das Spiegelneuronensystem und seine Rolle in der neurologischen Rehabilitation. Neurologie und Rehabilitation 2004; 03: 113-20.
    Google Scholar
  • 4 Bobath B. Die Hemiplegie Erwachsener. Stuttgart: Thieme Verlag; 1980
    Google Scholar
  • 5 Brunnstrom S. Movement therapie in hemiplegia. New York: Harper & Row; 1970
    Google Scholar
  • 6 Bütefisch C, Hummelsheim H, Denzler P, Mauritz KH. Repetitive training of isolated movements improves the outcome of motor rehabilitation of the centrally paretic hand. J Neurol Sci 1995; 130: 59-68.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Carr JH, Sheperd RB. Movement Science: Foundations for physical therapy in rehabilitation. Rockville Maryland: Aspen Publishers; 1987
    Google Scholar
  • 8 Chen CL, Yeung KT, Wang CH, Chu HT, Yeh CY. Anterior ankle-foot orthosis on postural stability in hemiplegic patients. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1999; 80: 1587-92.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 de Kroon JR, van der Lee JH, Ijzerman MJ, Lankhorst GJ. Therapeutic electrical stimulation to improve motor control and functional abilities of the upper extremitiy after stroke: a systematic review. Clin Rehabil 2002; 16: 350-60.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Dickstein R, Hocherman S, Pillar T, Shaham R. Stroke Rehabilitation: Three Exercise Therapy Approaches. Physical Therapy 1986; 66: 1233-8.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Dijkerman HC, Leetswart M, Johnston M, MacWalter RS. Does motor imagery training improve hand function in chronic stroke patients?A pilot study. Clin Rehabil 2004; 18: 538-49.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Duncan P, Studenski S, Richards L, Gollub S, Min SLai, Reker D, Perera S, Yates J, Koch V, Rigler S, Johnson D. Randomized Clinical Trial of therapeutic exercise in subacute stroke. Stroke 2003; 34: 2173-80.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Eich HJ, Mach H, Werner C, Hesse S. Aerobic treadmill plus Bobath walking training improves walking in subacute stroke: a randomized controlled trial. Clinical Rehabilitation 2004; 18: 640-51.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Feys HM, De Weerdt WJ, Selz BE. Effect of a therapeutic intervention for the hemiplegic upper limb in the acute phase after stroke. Stroke 1998; 29: 785-92.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Feys HM, De Weerdt WJ, Verbeke G, Cox GASteck, Cspiau C, Kiekens C, Dejaeger E, Van Hoydonck GA, Vermeersch G, Cras P. Early and repetitive stimulation of the arm can substantially improve the long-term outcome after stroke: a 5-year follow-up study of a randomised trial. Stroke 2004; 35: 924-9.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Frommelt P. Neurologische Erkrankungen. In: Verband Deutscher Rentenversicherungsträger (Hrsg). Sozialmedizinische Begutachtung in der gesetzlichen Rentenversicherung. Stuttgart: Gustav Fischer Verlag; 1995: 409-51.
    Google Scholar
  • 17 Gelber DA, Josefezyk PB, Herrman D, Good DC, Verhulst SJ. Comparison of2 therapy approaches in the rehabilitation of pure motor hemiparetic stroke patients. J Neuro Rehab 1995; 09: 191-6.
    Google Scholar
  • 18 Götze R, Pössl J, Zigler W. Überprüfung der Wirksamkeit der alltagsorientierten Therapie (AOT) bei Patienten mit erworbener Hirnschädigung. Neurol Rehabil 2005; 11: 13-20.
    Google Scholar
  • 19 Hesse S, Bertelt C, Schaffrin A, Malezic M, Mauritz KH. Treadmill training with partial body weight support as compared to physiotherapie in non-ambulatory hemiparetic patients. Stroke 1995; 26: 976-81.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Hesse S, Staats M, Werner C, Bestmann A, Lingau ML. Ambulante Krankengymnastik von Schlaganfallpatienten zu Hause. Nervenarzt 2001; 72: 950-4.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Hinderer SR, Gupta S. Functional outcome measures to assess intervention for spasticity. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1996; 77: 1083-9.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Humm JL, Kozlowski DA, James DC, Gotts JE, Schallert T. Use-dependent exacerbation of brain damage occurs during an early post-lesion vulnerable period. Brain Research 1998; 783: 286-92.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Hummelsheim H, Maier-Loth ML, Eickhof C. The functional value of electrical muscle stimulation for the rehabilitation of the hand in stroke patients. Scand J Rehabil Med 1997; 29: 3-10.
    Google Scholar
  • 24 Hwang I, Tung L, Yang J, Chen Y, Yeh C, Wang C. Electromyographic analyses of global synkinesis in the paretic upper limb after stroke. Physical Therapy 2005; 85: 755-65.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Knott M, Voss DE. Proprioceptive Neuromuscular Fascilitation. New York: Harper & Row; 1968
    Google Scholar
  • 26 Kosak MC, Reding MJ. Comparison of partial body weight-supported treadmill gait training versus aggressive bracing assisted walking post stroke. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2000; 14: 13-9.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Langhammer B, Stanghelle JK. Bobath or motor relearning programme? A comparison of two different approaches of physiotherapy in stroke rehabilitation: a randomized controlled study. Clin Rehabil 2000; 14: 361-9.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Langhammer B, Stanghelle JK. Bobath or motor relearning programme? A follow up one and four years post stroke. Clin Rehabil 2003; 17: 731-4.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Leathley MJ, Gregson JM, Moore AP, Smith TL, Sharma AK, Watkins CL. Prediciting spasticity after stroke in those surviving to 12 months. Clin Rehabil 2004; 18: 438-43.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Lerner-Frankiel MB, Vargas S, Brown MB, Krusell L, Schoneberger W. Functional community ambulation: what are your criteria?. Clinical Management 1990; 06: 12-5.
    Google Scholar
  • 31 Logigian MK, Samuels MA, Falconer J, Zagar R. Clinical Exercise Trial for stroke patients. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1983; 64: 364-7.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 32 Luft AR, McCombe-Waller S, Whitall J, Forrester LW, Macko R, Sorkin JD, Schulz JB, Goldberg AP, Hanley DF. Repetitive bilateral arm training and motor cortex activation in chronic stroke. JAMA 2004; 292: 1853-61.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 33 Lum PS, Burgar CG, Shor PC, van der Majmundar M. Robot-assisted training compared with conventional therapy techniques for the rehabilitation of the upper-limb motor function after stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2002; 83: 952-9.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 34 Majsak MJ. Application of motor learning principles to the stroke population. Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation 1996; 03: 27-59.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 35 Marsden J, Greenwood R. Physiotherapie after stroke: define, divide and conquer. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2005; 76: 465-6.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 36 McNevin N, Wulf G, Carlson C. Effects of attentional focus, self-control and dyad training on motor learning: implications for physical rehabilitation. Physical Therapy 2000; 80: 373-85.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 37 Mehrholz J, Pohl M. Trainiert Physiotherapie im Rahmen der neurologischen Rehabilitation ausreichend das Herz-Kreislaufsystem?. Neurol Rehabil 2005; 11: 126-30.
    Google Scholar
  • 38 Miltner WH, Bauder H, Sommer M, Dettmers C, Taub E. Effects of constraint-induced movement therapy on patients with chronic motor deficits after stroke: a replication. Stroke 1999; 30: 586-92.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 39 O´Dwyer NJ, Ada L, Neilson PD. Spasticity and muscle contracture following stroke. Brain 1996; 119: 1737-49.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 40 Paci M. Physiotherapy based on the Bobath concept for adults with post-stroke hemiplegia: a review of effectiveness studies. J Rehabil Med 2003; 35: 2-7.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 41 Platz T. Evidenzbasierte Armrehabilitation. Eine systematische Literaturübersicht. Nervenarzt 2003; 74: 841-9.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 42 Pohl M, Mehrholz J, Ritschel C, Ruckriem S. Speed-dependent treadmill training in ambulatory hemiparetic stroke patients. Stroke 2002; 33: 553-8.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 43 Sommerfeld DK, Eek EU-B, Svensson A-K, Holmqvist LW, von Arbin MH. Spasticity after stroke. Its occurrence and association with motor impairments and activity limitations. Stroke 2004; 35: 134-40.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 44 Stern PH, McDowell F, Miller FM, Robinson M. Effects of facilitation exercise techniques in stroke rehabilitation. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1970; 51: 526-31.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 45 Sterr A, Freivogel S. Intensive Training in chronic upper-limb hemiparesis does not increase spasticity or synergies. Neurology 2004; 63: 2176-7.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 46 Stevens JA, Stoykov ME. Simulation of bilateral movement training through mirror reflection: a case report demonstrating an occupational therapy technique for hemiparesis. Top Stroke Rehabil 2004; 11: 59-66.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 47 Taub E, Miller NE, Novack TA, Cook EW, Fleming WC, Nepomuceno CS, Connell JS, Crago JE. Technique to improve chronic motor deficit after stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1993; 74: 347-54.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 48 van der Lee JH, Wagenaar RC, Lankhorst GJ, Vogelaar TW, Deville WL, Bouter LM. Forced use of the upper extremity in chronic stroke patients: results from a single-blind randomized clinical trial. Stroke 1999; 30: 2369-75.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 49 van Vliet PM, Lincoln NB, Foxall A. Comparison of Bobath based and movement science based treatment for stroke: a randomised controlled trial. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2005; 76: 503-8.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 50 Watkins CL, Leathley MJ, Gregson JM, Moore AP, Smith TL, Sharma AK. Prevalence of spasticity post stroke. Clin Rehabil 2002; 16: 515-22.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 51 Weiss A, Suzuki T, Bean J, Fielding RA. High intensity strenght training improves strength and functional performance one year after stroke. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2000; 79: 369-76.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 52 Whitall J, McCombe SWaller, Silver K, Macko R. Repetitive bilateral arm training with rhythmic auditory cueing improves motor function in chronic hemiparetic stroke. Stroke 2000; 31: 2390-5.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 53 Woldag H, Waldmann G, Heuschkel G, Hummelsheim H. Is the repetitiv training of complex movements beneficial for motor recovery in stroke patients?. Clinical Rehabilitation 2003; 17: 723-30.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 54 Woods PDuncan. Synthesis of intervention trials to improve motor recovery following stroke. Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation 1997; 03: 1-20.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 55 Wu C, Trombly CA, Lin K, Tickle-Degnen L. A kinematic study of contextual effects on reaching performance in persons with and without stroke: influences of object availability. Arch Phys Med Rehbil 2000; 81: 95-101.
    Google Scholar
  • 56 Yan T, Hui-Chan CWY, Li LSW. Functional electrical stimulation improves motor recovery of lower extremity an walking ability of subjects with first acute stroke. Stroke 2005; 36: 80-5.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar