J Knee Surg 2018; 31(09): 846-850
DOI: 10.1055/s-0037-1615823
Original Article
Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.

Risk Factors for Contralateral ACL Injury: A Single Institution Case–Control Study

Todd P. Pierce
1   Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Seton Hall University School of Health and Medical Sciences, South Orange, New Jersey
,
Kimona Issa
1   Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Seton Hall University School of Health and Medical Sciences, South Orange, New Jersey
,
Kaitlin Cassidy
1   Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Seton Hall University School of Health and Medical Sciences, South Orange, New Jersey
,
Anthony Festa
1   Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Seton Hall University School of Health and Medical Sciences, South Orange, New Jersey
,
Vincent K. McInerney
1   Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Seton Hall University School of Health and Medical Sciences, South Orange, New Jersey
,
Anthony J. Scillia
1   Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Seton Hall University School of Health and Medical Sciences, South Orange, New Jersey
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

27 February 2017

22 November 2017

Publication Date:
03 January 2018 (online)

Abstract

Our purpose was to evaluate if there is any association between requiring contralateral anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction and various: (1) demographics, (2) patient characteristics, and (3) surgery-specific factors. A prospectively collected database at a single institution was queried to find all patients who underwent primary ACL reconstruction between 2012 and 2014. We identified 312 primary ACL reconstruction patients with a mean age of 24 years and a mean follow-up of 3 years (range, 2–5 years). This cohort was compared with all those who had primary ACL reconstructions during the same time period without a contralateral procedure. We evaluated: (1) incidence, (2) demographic variables, (3) family history, (4) graft choice, (5) activity causing injury, and (6) mechanism of injury (contact versus noncontact). There were 16 patients (4.8%) with a mean age of 21 years and a mean follow-up of 3 years that required a contralateral reconstruction. More females required contralateral reconstruction when compared with the control cohort (p = 0.049). However, there was no difference in the mean age between the cohorts (p = 0.32). Those who underwent reconstruction using a tibialis anterior allograft were far more likely to require a contralateral reconstruction (p = 0.0002). Bone-tendon-bone patellar autograft (p = 0.16), hamstring autograft (p = 0.76), and hamstring allograft (p = 0.68) had similar incidences of contralateral ACL injury. Lacrosse was associated with higher risk of contralateral procedure (p = 0.03). Mechanism of injury had no association of contralateral reconstruction (p = 0.71). We found that those with the highest risk of contralateral ACL reconstruction following their index procedure were females, those with tibialis anterior allografts, and those who had their ipsilateral injury while playing lacrosse. These data may be used by practitioners when educating patients regarding their potential for requiring a contralateral reconstruction following their index procedure.

 
  • References

  • 1 Hootman JM, Dick R, Agel J. Epidemiology of collegiate injuries for 15 sports: summary and recommendations for injury prevention initiatives. J Athl Train 2007; 42 (02) 311-319
  • 2 Vaishya R, Agarwal AK, Ingole S, Vijay V. Current trends in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a review. Cureus 2015; 7 (11) e378
  • 3 Chalmers PN, Mall NA, Moric M. , et al. Does ACL reconstruction alter natural history?: a systematic literature review of long-term outcomes. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2014; 96 (04) 292-300
  • 4 Ristić V, Ristić S, Maljanović M, Đan V, Milankov V, Harhaji V. Risk factors for bilateral anterior cruciate ligament injuries. Med Pregl 2015; 68 (5-6): 192-197
  • 5 Kaeding CC, Pedroza AD, Reinke EK, Huston LJ, Spindler KP. ; MOON Consortium. Risk factors and predictors of subsequent ACL injury in either knee after ACL reconstruction: prospective analysis of 2488 primary ACL reconstructions from the MOON cohort. Am J Sports Med 2015; 43 (07) 1583-1590
  • 6 Maletis GB, Inacio MC, Funahashi TT. Risk factors associated with revision and contralateral anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions in the Kaiser Permanente ACLR registry. Am J Sports Med 2015; 43 (03) 641-647
  • 7 Andernord D, Desai N, Björnsson H, Gillén S, Karlsson J, Samuelsson K. Predictors of contralateral anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a cohort study of 9061 patients with 5-year follow-up. Am J Sports Med 2015; 43 (02) 295-302
  • 8 Kvist J, Kartus J, Karlsson J, Forssblad M. Results from the Swedish national anterior cruciate ligament register. Arthroscopy 2014; 30 (07) 803-810
  • 9 Heijne A, Hagströmer M, Werner S. A two- and five-year follow-up of clinical outcome after ACL reconstruction using BPTB or hamstring tendon grafts: a prospective intervention outcome study. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2015; 23 (03) 799-807
  • 10 Bourke HE, Salmon LJ, Waller A, Patterson V, Pinczewski LA. Survival of the anterior cruciate ligament graft and the contralateral ACL at a minimum of 15 years. Am J Sports Med 2012; 40 (09) 1985-1992
  • 11 Paterno MV, Rauh MJ, Schmitt LC, Ford KR, Hewett TE. Incidence of contralateral and ipsilateral anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury after primary ACL reconstruction and return to sport. Clin J Sport Med 2012; 22 (02) 116-121
  • 12 Shelbourne KD, Gray T. Minimum 10-year results after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: how the loss of normal knee motion compounds other factors related to the development of osteoarthritis after surgery. Am J Sports Med 2009; 37 (03) 471-480
  • 13 Fältström A, Hägglund M, Kvist J. Patient-reported knee function, quality of life, and activity level after bilateral anterior cruciate ligament injuries. Am J Sports Med 2013; 41 (12) 2805-2813
  • 14 Dunn WR, Spindler KP, Consortium M. ; MOON Consortium. Predictors of activity level 2 years after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR): a Multicenter Orthopaedic Outcomes Network (MOON) ACLR cohort study. Am J Sports Med 2010; 38 (10) 2040-2050
  • 15 Drogset JO, Grøntvedt T. Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with and without a ligament augmentation device: results at 8-year follow-up. Am J Sports Med 2002; 30 (06) 851-856
  • 16 Webster KE, Feller JA, Leigh WB, Richmond AK. Younger patients are at increased risk for graft rupture and contralateral injury after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med 2014; 42 (03) 641-647