Facial Plast Surg 2017; 33(04): 444-450
DOI: 10.1055/s-0037-1604290
Rapid Communication
Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.

Geometric Modeling of the Nasal Valve

Anthony P. Sclafani
1   Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York
2   Center for Facial Plastic Surgery, Chappaqua, New York
,
Wasnard Victor
3   Department of Medicine, Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, New York
,
Matthew S. Sclafani
2   Center for Facial Plastic Surgery, Chappaqua, New York
› Institutsangaben
Weitere Informationen

Publikationsverlauf

Publikationsdatum:
28. Juli 2017 (online)

Abstract

We have used a simple geometric model to examine forces affecting the nasal valve after dorsal reduction and spreader graft placement. The study was designed on the geometric modeling of the internal nasal valve (INV). Published measurements of the leptorrhine nose were used to construct a geometric model of the INV. The changes in the cross-sectional area (CSA) occurring after reduction rhinoplasty were calculated algebraically, as was the effect of these changes on the tendency of the lateral wall of the INV to collapse. The effect of spreader grafting on the CSA was determined, and the total change in CSA of the INV in various scenarios was determined and compared with the reported normal CSA. Relative to published norms, the gain in CSA from spreader grafting can be significant if thick grafts are used. When the lateral wall of the INV is conceptualized as a cantilevered beam fixed medially, the reduction of length reduction of the lateral segment of the INV can significantly reduce the tendency for the inward collapse of the lateral wall. The reduction in CSA of the INV associated with dorsal nasal reduction can be ameliorated through the placement of spreader grafts. Moreover, the reduction in length of the INV sidewall also limits inward collapse, assuming it is firmly reattached to the dorsal septum. An enhanced appreciation of the physical properties of the INV anticipated through a simplified geometric analysis will be invaluable to the rhinological surgeon interested in enhancing nasal function.

Funding

This research received no specific grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sector. None of the authors has any pertinent financial disclosure.


 
  • References

  • 1 Courtiss EH, Goldwyn RM. The effects of nasal surgery on airflow. Plast Reconstr Surg 1983; 72 (01) 9-21
  • 2 Tarabichi M, Fanous N. Finite element analysis of airflow in the nasal valve. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1993; 119 (06) 638-642
  • 3 Rhee JS, Cannon DE, Frank DO, Kimbell JS. Role of virtual surgery in preoperative planning: assessing the individual components of functional nasal airway surgery. Arch Facial Plast Surg 2012; 14 (05) 354-359
  • 4 de Pochat VD, Alonso N, Figueredo A, Ribeiro EB, Mendes RR, Meneses JV. The role of septal cartilage in rhinoplasty: cadaveric analysis and assessment of graft selection. Aesthet Surg J 2011; 31 (08) 891-896
  • 5 Saunders MW, Jones NS, Kabala J, Lowe J. An anatomical, histological and magnetic resonance imaging study of the nasal septum. Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci 1995; 20 (05) 434-438
  • 6 Mowlavi A, Masouem S, Kalkanis J, Guyuron B. Septal cartilage defined: implications for nasal dynamics and rhinoplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg 2006; 117 (07) 2171-2174
  • 7 Potter JK, Rogers T, Finn R. Macroscopic and microscopic details of the cartilaginous nasal pyramid. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2000; 58 (08) 867-876
  • 8 Schlosser RJ, Park SS. Surgery for the dysfunctional nasal valve. Cadaveric analysis and clinical outcomes. Arch Facial Plast Surg 1999; 1 (02) 105-110
  • 9 Wexler DB, Davidson TM. The nasal valve: a review of the anatomy, imaging, and physiology. Am J Rhinol 2004; 18 (03) 143-150
  • 10 Gupta A, Brooks D, Stager S, Lindsey WH. Surgical access to the internal nasal valve. Arch Facial Plast Surg 2003; 5 (02) 155-158
  • 11 Bridger GP, Proctor DF. Maximum nasal inspiratory flow and nasal resistance. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1970; 79 (03) 481-488
  • 12 Grymer LF. Reduction rhinoplasty and nasal patency: change in the cross-sectional area of the nose evaluated by acoustic rhinometry. Laryngoscope 1995; 105 (4 Pt 1): 429-431
  • 13 Coan BS, Neff E, Mukundan Jr S, Marcus JR. Validation of a cadaveric model for comprehensive physiologic and anatomic evaluation of rhinoplastic techniques. Plast Reconstr Surg 2009; 124 (06) 2107-2117
  • 14 Cannon DE, Rhee JS. Evidence-based practice: functional rhinoplasty. Otolaryngol Clin North Am 2012; 45 (05) 1033-1043
  • 15 Goldman IB. Rhinoplastic sequelae causing nasal obstruction. Arch Otolaryngol 1966; 83 (02) 151-155
  • 16 Adamson P, Smith O, Cole P. The effect of cosmetic rhinoplasty on nasal patency. Laryngoscope 1990; 100 (04) 357-359
  • 17 “Cantilever beam.” American Heritage® Dictionary of the English Language, Fifth Edition. 2011. Houghton Mifflin Harcourt Publishing Company. Available at http://www.thefreedictionary.com/Cantilever+beam . Accessed June 28, 2016
  • 18 Rohrich RJ, Pulikkottil BJ, Stark RY, Amirlak B, Pezeshk RA. The importance of the upper lateral cartilage in rhinoplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg 2016; 137 (02) 476-483
  • 19 Sheen JH. Spreader graft: a method of reconstructing the roof of the middle nasal vault following rhinoplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg 1984; 73 (02) 230-239
  • 20 Hwang K, Huan F, Kim DJ. Mapping thickness of nasal septal cartilage. J Craniofac Surg 2010; 21 (01) 243-244
  • 21 Chambers KJ, Horstkotte KA, Shanley K, Lindsay RW. Evaluation of improvement in nasal obstruction following nasal valve correction in patients with a history of failed septoplasty. JAMA Facial Plast Surg 2015; 17 (05) 347-350
  • 22 Yeung A, Hassouneh B, Kim DW. Outcome of nasal valve obstruction after functional and aesthetic-functional rhinoplasty. JAMA Facial Plast Surg 2016; 18 (02) 128-134
  • 23 Marcus BC. The nasal valve- not just for functional surgery anymore. JAMA Facial Plast Surg 2016; 18 (02) 135-135
  • 24 Apaydin F. Rebuilding the middle vault in rhinoplasty: a new classification of spreader flaps/grafts. Facial Plast Surg 2016; 32 (06) 638-645
  • 25 Haight JSJ, Cole P. The site and function of the nasal valve. Laryngoscope 1983; 93 (01) 49-55
  • 26 Bruintjes TD, van Olphen AF, Hillen B, Huizing EH. A functional anatomic study of the relationship of the nasal cartilages and muscles to the nasal valve area. Laryngoscope 1998; 108 (07) 1025-1032
  • 27 Lee SJ, Liong K, Tse KM, Lee HP. Biomechanics of the deformity of septal L-Struts. Laryngoscope 2010; 120 (08) 1508-1515
  • 28 Lee SJ, Liong K, Lee HP. Deformation of nasal septum during nasal trauma. Laryngoscope 2010; 120 (10) 1931-1939
  • 29 Manuel CT, Leary R, Protsenko DE, Wong BJF. Nasal tip support: a finite element analysis of the role of the caudal septum during tip depression. Laryngoscope 2014; 124 (03) 649-654
  • 30 Tjoa T, Manuel CT, Leary RP, Harb R, Protsenko DE, Wong BJF. A finite element model to simulate formation of the inverted-V deformity. JAMA Facial Plast Surg 2016; 18 (02) 136-143
  • 31 Rhee JS, Pawar SS, Garcia GJM, Kimbell JS. Toward personalized nasal surgery using computational fluid dynamics. Arch Facial Plast Surg 2011; 13 (05) 305-310
  • 32 Cannon DE, Frank DO, Kimbell JS, Poetker DM, Rhee JS. Modeling nasal physiology changes due to septal perforations. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2013; 148 (03) 513-518
  • 33 Shadfar S, Shockley WW, Fleischman GM. , et al. Characterization of postoperative changes in nasal airflow using a cadaveric computational fluid dynamics model: supporting the internal nasal valve. JAMA Facial Plast Surg 2014; 16 (05) 319-327