J Knee Surg 2018; 31(05): 479-484
DOI: 10.1055/s-0037-1604148
Original Article
Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.

Radiographic and Functional Outcomes following Knee Arthrodesis Using the Wichita Fusion Nail

Paula McQuail
1   Department of Surgery, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Dublin, Ireland
,
Ben McCartney
1   Department of Surgery, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Dublin, Ireland
,
Joseph Baker
1   Department of Surgery, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Dublin, Ireland
,
James Green
2   Department of Statistics, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Dublin, Ireland
,
Peter Keogh
1   Department of Surgery, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Dublin, Ireland
,
Patrick Kenny
1   Department of Surgery, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Dublin, Ireland
› Author Affiliations
Funding None.
Further Information

Publication History

25 January 2017

31 May 2017

Publication Date:
18 July 2017 (online)

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to report both the radiographic and functional outcomes of patients undergoing knee arthrodesis with the Wichita Fusion Nail (WFN) within the Republic of Ireland and compare the results to existing literature. Patient charts and radiographs were reviewed on all patients who had a WFN implanted in Ireland to date. Patients were invited to complete a Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) score as a functional assessment. Twenty-three patients were identified. Patients had an average of 8 (range: 0–26) knee surgeries prior to arthrodesis. The most common indication was failed arthroplasty due to recalcitrant infection (69.5%). Successful fusion occurred in 60.8% of patients. The mean time to fusion was 9.21 months. The mean WOMAC score was 58.55 with a range of 31 to 96. We found a rate of arthrodesis lower than that reported in other published series. However, the rate of major complications was comparable to those published previously, reflecting the often-challenging patient cohort. Our study shows that the WFN should not be viewed as a near-universally successful option to salvage an unreconstructable knee.

 
  • References

  • 1 Ellingsen DE, Rand JA. Intramedullary arthrodesis of the knee after failed total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1994; 76 (06) 870-877
  • 2 Vlasak R, Gearen PF, Petty W. Knee arthrodesis in the treatment of failed total knee replacement. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1995; (321) 138-144
  • 3 Wasielewski RC, Barden RM, Rosenberg AG. Results of different surgical procedures on total knee arthroplasty infections. J Arthroplasty 1996; 11 (08) 931-938
  • 4 Woods GW, Lionberger DR, Tullos HS. Failed total knee arthroplasty. Revision and arthrodesis for infection and noninfectious complications. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1983; (173) 184-190
  • 5 Kohn D, Schmolke S. [Arthrodesis following revision of a knee endoprosthesis. Literature review 1984-1994]. Orthopade 1996; 25 (02) 153-157
  • 6 Harris CM, Froehlich J. Knee fusion with intramedullary rods for failed total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1985; (197) 209-216
  • 7 Conway JD, Mont MA, Bezwada HP. Arthrodesis of the knee. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2004; 86-A (04) 835-848
  • 8 Klinger HM, Spahn G, Schultz W, Baums MH. Arthrodesis of the knee after failed infected total knee arthroplasty. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2006; 14 (05) 447-453
  • 9 McQueen DA, Cooke FW, Hahn DL. Knee arthrodesis with the Wichita Fusion Nail: an outcome comparison. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2006; 446 (446) 132-139
  • 10 Behr JT, Chmell SJ, Schwartz CM. Knee arthrodesis for failed total knee arthroplasty. Arch Surg 1985; 120 (03) 350-354
  • 11 Talmo CT, Burke DW. Knee arthrodesis using plate osteosynthesis. Tech Knee Surg 2009; 8 (04) 230-234
  • 12 Oostenbroek HJ, van Roermund PM. Arthrodesis of the knee after an infected arthroplasty using the Ilizarov method. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2001; 83 (01) 50-54
  • 13 Manzotti A, Pullen C, Deromedis B, Catagni MA. Knee arthrodesis after infected total knee arthroplasty using the Ilizarov method. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2001; (389) 143-149
  • 14 Isiklar ZU, Landon GC, Tullos HS. Amputation after failed total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1994; (299) 173-178
  • 15 McQueen DA, Cooke FW, Hahn DL. Intramedullary compression arthrodesis of the knee: early experience with a new device and technique. J Arthroplasty 2005; 20 (01) 72-78
  • 16 Christie MJ, DeBoer DK, McQueen DA, Cooke FW, Hahn DL. Salvage procedures for failed total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2003; 85-A (Suppl. 01) S58-S62
  • 17 McConnell S, Kolopack P, Davis AM. The Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC): a review of its utility and measurement properties. Arthritis Rheum 2001; 45 (05) 453-461
  • 18 Domingo LJ, Caballero MJ, Cuenca J, Herrera A, Sola A, Herrero L. Knee arthrodesis with the Wichita Fusion Nail. Int Orthop 2004; 28 (01) 25-27
  • 19 Barsoum WK, Hogg C, Krebs V, Klika AK. Wichita Fusion Nail for patients with failed total knee arthroplasty and active infection. Am J Orthop 2008; 37 (01) E6-E10
  • 20 Parcel TW, Levering M, Polikandriotis JA, Gustke KA, Bernasek TL. Failure analysis of knee arthrodesis with the Wichita Fusion Nail. Orthopedics 2013; 36 (11) e1336-e1339
  • 21 Rand JA, Bryan RS, Chao EY. Failed total knee arthroplasty treated by arthrodesis of the knee using the Ace-Fischer apparatus. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1987; 69 (01) 39-45
  • 22 Kaufer H, Matthews LS. Resection arthroplasty: an alternative to arthrodesis for salvage of the infected total knee arthroplasty. Instr Course Lect 1986; 35 (283) 283-289
  • 23 Parvizi J. The Knee—Reconstruction, Replacement and Revision. Data Trace Publishing Company, 2012
  • 24 Röhner E, Windisch C, Nuetzmann K, Rau M, Arnhold M, Matziolis G. Unsatisfactory outcome of arthrodesis performed after septic failure of revision total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2015; 97 (04) 298-301