Facial plast Surg 2017; 33(04): 388-395
DOI: 10.1055/s-0037-1603789
Original Article
Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.

Numerical Analysis of Nasal Breathing: A Pilot Study

Jan Joris Brüning1, Leonid Goubergrits1, Werner Heppt2, Stefan Zachow3, Thomas Hildebrandt4
  • 1Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Labor für Biofluidmechanik, Berlin, Germany
  • 2Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Städtisches Klinikum Karlsruhe GmbH, Karlsruhe, Baden-Württemberg, Germany
  • 3Department of Visual Data Analysis, Zuse Institute Berlin, Berlin, Germany
  • 4Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Limmatklinik, Zürich, Switzerland
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
28 July 2017 (online)

Abstract

Currently, there is no fully sufficient way to differentiate between symptomatic and normal nasal breathing. Using the nose's total resistance is disputed as a valid means to objectify nasal airflow, and the need for a more comprehensive diagnostic method is increasing. This work's aim was to test a novel approach considering intranasal wall shear stress (WSS) as well as static pressure maps obtained by computational fluid dynamics (CFD). X-ray computed tomography (CT) scan data of six symptom-free subjects and seven symptomatic patients were used. Patient-specific geometries of the nasal cavity were segmented from these datasets. Inspiratory and expiratory steady airflow simulations were performed using CFD. Calculated static pressures and WSSs were mapped onto a common template of the nasal septum, allowing for comparison of these parameters between the two patient groups. Significant differences in WSS distributions during the inspiratory phase could be identified between the two groups, whereas no differences were found for the expiratory phase. It is assumed that one essential feature of normal nasal breathing probably consists of distinctively different intranasal flow fields for inspiration and expiration. This is in accordance with previous investigations. The proposed method seems to be a promising tool for developing a new kind of patient-specific assessment of nasal breathing. However, more studies and a greater case number of data with an expanded focus would be ideal.