Download PDF
Am J Perinatol 2016; 33(11): 1050-1054
DOI: 10.1055/s-0036-1586113
Review Article
Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.

Osteopathic Manipulative Treatment in Pediatric and Neonatal Patients and Disorders: Clinical Considerations and Updated Review of the Existing Literature

Donatella Bagagiolo
1   Research Department, Scuola Superiore di Osteopatia Italiana, Torino, Italy
,
Alessia Didio
1   Research Department, Scuola Superiore di Osteopatia Italiana, Torino, Italy
,
Marco Sbarbaro
1   Research Department, Scuola Superiore di Osteopatia Italiana, Torino, Italy
,
Claudio Giuseppe Priolo
2   Division of Neonatology and NICU, Sant'Anna Hospital, Azienda Ospedaliera Regina Margherita Sant'Anna, Torino, Italy
,
Tiziana Borro
2   Division of Neonatology and NICU, Sant'Anna Hospital, Azienda Ospedaliera Regina Margherita Sant'Anna, Torino, Italy
,
Daniele Farina
2   Division of Neonatology and NICU, Sant'Anna Hospital, Azienda Ospedaliera Regina Margherita Sant'Anna, Torino, Italy
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
07 September 2016 (online)

   Buy Article Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Osteopathic medicine is a form of complementary and alternative medicine. Osteopathic practitioners treat patients of all ages: according to the Osteopathic International Alliance's 2012 survey, about one-third of all treated patients are aged between 31 and 50 years and nearly a quarter (23.4%) are pediatric patients, with 8.7% of them being younger than 2 years. In 2013 a systematic review evaluated the effectiveness of osteopathic manipulative treatment (OMT) in pediatric patients with different underlying disorders, but due to the paucity and low methodological quality of the primary studies the results were inconclusive. The aim of this review is therefore to update the evidence concerning OMT in perinatal and pediatric disorders and to assess its clinical impact. Most published studies favor OMT, but the generally small sample sizes in these studies cannot support ultimate conclusions about the efficacy of osteopathic therapy in pediatric age. In turn, clinical trials of OMT in premature infants might represent an important step in the osteopathic research because they can address both cost-effectiveness issues, and an innovative, multidisciplinary approach to the management of specific pediatric diseases cared for by the same, common health care system. The available studies in neonatal settings provide evidence that OMT is effective in reducing the hospital length of stay of the treated infants, therefore, suggesting that robust cost-effectiveness analyses should be included in the future clinical trials' design to establish new possible OMT-shared strategies within the health care services provided to newborns.

Keywords

osteopathic manipulative treatment - pediatric - preterm - positional plagiocephaly - infantile colic - cost-effectiveness
 

  • References

  • 1 World Health Organization (WHO). Benchmark for Training in Osteopathy: Benchmarks for Training in Traditional/Complementary and Alternative Medicine. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization; 2010. Available at: http://www.who.int/medicines/areas/traditional/BenchmarksforTraininginOsteopathy.pdf . Accessed December 2, 2015
    Google Scholar
  • 2 Osteopathic International Alliance (OIA). History and Current Context of the Osteopathic Profession: History and Current Context of the Osteopathic Profession, Status Report on Osteopathy Stage I. Chicago, IL: Osteopathic International Alliance; Available at: http://wp.oialliance.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/07/oia-status-report-history-context-of-osteopathic-profession.pdf. Accessed October 9, 2015
    Google Scholar
  • 3 American Association of Colleges of Osteopathic Medicine. Glossary of Osteopathic Terminology. Available at: https://www.aacom.org/docs/default-source/insideome/got2011ed.pdf?sfvrsn=2 . Accessed December 2, 2015
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Lund G, Carreiro JE. Characteristics of pediatric patients seen in medical school-based osteopathic manipulative medicine clinics. J Am Osteopath Assoc 2010; 110 (07) 376-380
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Duncan B, McDonough-Means S, Worden K, Schnyer R, Andrews J, Meaney FJ. Effectiveness of osteopathy in the cranial field and myofascial release versus acupuncture as complementary treatment for children with spastic cerebral palsy: a pilot study. J Am Osteopath Assoc 2008; 108 (10) 559-570
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Guiney PA, Chou R, Vianna A, Lovenheim J. Effects of osteopathic manipulative treatment on pediatric patients with asthma: a randomized controlled trial. J Am Osteopath Assoc 2005; 105 (01) 7-12
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Wahl RA, Aldous MB, Worden KA, Grant KL. Echinacea purpurea and osteopathic manipulative treatment in children with recurrent otitis media: a randomized controlled trial. BMC Complement Altern Med 2008; 8: 56
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Lessard S, Gagnon I, Trottier N. Exploring the impact of osteopathic treatment on cranial asymmetries associated with nonsynostotic plagiocephaly in infants. Complement Ther Clin Pract 2011; 17 (04) 193-198
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Posadzki P, Lee MS, Ernst E. Osteopathic manipulative treatment for pediatric conditions: a systematic review. Pediatrics 2013; 132 (01) 140-152
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Blencowe H, Cousens S, Chou D. , et al; Born Too Soon Preterm Birth Action Group. Born too soon: the global epidemiology of 15 million preterm births. Reprod Health 2013; 10 (Suppl. 01) S2
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Cerritelli F, Pizzolorusso G, Renzetti C. , et al. Effectiveness of osteopathic manipulative treatment in neonatal intensive care units: protocol for a multicentre randomised clinical trial. BMJ Open 2013; 3 (02) e002187
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Petrou S, Khan K. Economic costs associated with moderate and late preterm birth: primary and secondary evidence. Semin Fetal Neonatal Med 2012; 17 (03) 170-178
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Cerritelli F, Pizzolorusso G, Renzetti C. , et al. A multicenter, randomized, controlled trial of osteopathic manipulative treatment on preterms. PLoS ONE 2015; 10 (05) e0127370
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Pizzolorusso G, Cerritelli F, Accorsi A. , et al. The effect of optimally timed osteopathic manipulative treatment on length of hospital stay in moderate and late preterm infants: results from a RCT. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med 2014; 2014: 243539
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Cerritelli F, Pizzolorusso G, Ciardelli F. , et al. Effect of osteopathic manipulative treatment on length of stay in a population of preterm infants: a randomized controlled trial. BMC Pediatr 2013; 13: 65
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Pizzolorusso G, Turi P, Barlafante G. , et al. Effect of osteopathic manipulative treatment on gastrointestinal function and length of stay of preterm infants: an exploratory study. Chiropr Man Therap 2011; 19 (01) 15
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Lund GC, Edwards G, Medlin B, Keller D, Beck B, Carreiro JE. Osteopathic manipulative treatment for the treatment of hospitalized premature infants with nipple feeding dysfunction. J Am Osteopath Assoc 2011; 111 (01) 44-48
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Andreoli E, Troiani A, Tucci V. , et al. Osteopathic manipulative treatment of congenital talipes equinovarus: a case report. J Bodyw Mov Ther 2014; 18 (01) 4-10
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Haiden N, Pimpel B, Kreissl A, Jilma B, Berger A. Does visceral osteopathic treatment accelerate meconium passage in very low birth weight infants?- A prospective randomized controlled trial. PLoS ONE 2015; 10 (04) e0123530
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Rhoads JM, Fatheree NY, Norori J. , et al. Altered fecal microflora and increased fecal calprotectin in infants with colic. J Pediatr 2009; 155 (06) 823-828.e1
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Hayden C, Mullinger B. A preliminary assessment of the impact of cranial osteopathy for the relief of infantile colic. Complement Ther Clin Pract 2006; 12 (02) 83-90
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Looman WS, Flannery AB. Evidence-based care of the child with deformational plagiocephaly, Part I: assessment and diagnosis. J Pediatr Health Care 2012; 26 (04) 242-250 , quiz 251–253
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Flannery AB, Looman WS, Kemper K. Evidence-based care of the child with deformational plagiocephaly, part II: management. J Pediatr Health Care 2012; 26 (05) 320-331
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Peitsch WK, Keefer CH, LaBrie RA, Mulliken JB. Incidence of cranial asymmetry in healthy newborns. Pediatrics 2002; 110 (06) e72
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Bialocerkowski AE, Vladusic SL, Wei Ng C. Prevalence, risk factors, and natural history of positional plagiocephaly: a systematic review. Dev Med Child Neurol 2008; 50 (08) 577-586
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Hutchison BL, Hutchison LA, Thompson JM, Mitchell EA. Plagiocephaly and brachycephaly in the first two years of life: a prospective cohort study. Pediatrics 2004; 114 (04) 970-980
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Hutchison BL, Stewart AW, Mitchell EA. Characteristics, head shape measurements and developmental delay in 287 consecutive infants attending a plagiocephaly clinic. Acta Paediatr 2009; 98 (09) 1494-1499
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Speltz ML, Collett BR, Stott-Miller M. , et al. Case-control study of neurodevelopment in deformational plagiocephaly. Pediatrics 2010; 125 (03) e537-e542
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Kuo AA, Tritasavit S, Graham Jr JM. Congenital muscular torticollis and positional plagiocephaly. Pediatr Rev 2014; 35 (02) 79-87 , quiz 87
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 St John D, Mulliken JB, Kaban LB, Padwa BL. Anthropometric analysis of mandibular asymmetry in infants with deformational posterior plagiocephaly. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2002; 60 (08) 873-877
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 31 van Wijk RM, Pelsma M, Groothuis-Oudshoorn CG, IJzerman MJ, van Vlimmeren LA, Boere-Boonekamp MM. Response to pediatric physical therapy in infants with positional preference and skull deformation. Phys Ther 2014; 94 (09) 1262-1271
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 32 Graham Jr JM, Gomez M, Halberg A. , et al. Management of deformational plagiocephaly: repositioning versus orthotic therapy. J Pediatr 2005; 146 (02) 258-262
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 33 Shweikeh F, Nuño M, Danielpour M, Krieger MD, Drazin D. Positional plagiocephaly: an analysis of the literature on the effectiveness of current guidelines. Neurosurg Focus 2013; 35 (04) E1
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 34 Cerritelli F, Martelli M, Renzetti C, Pizzolorusso G, Cozzolino V, Barlafante G. Introducing an osteopathic approach into neonatology ward: the NE-O model. Chiropr Man Therap 2014; 22: 18
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 35 Williams NH, Wilkinson C, Russell I. , et al. Randomized osteopathic manipulation study (ROMANS): pragmatic trial for spinal pain in primary care. Fam Pract 2003; 20 (06) 662-669
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 36 Williams NH, Edwards RT, Linck P. , et al. Cost-utility analysis of osteopathy in primary care: results from a pragmatic randomized controlled trial. Fam Pract 2004; 21 (06) 643-650
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar