Free-Flap Reconstruction: What Do Microsurgeons Prefer for Themselves?

Abstract

Background The recent development of perforator flaps has changed the reconstructive strategy for common integumental defects and has refocused the attention of microsurgeons to donor site morbidity. We asked a representative panel of microsurgeons about the free flap they would use to cover a common integumental defect on their own body to investigate the best free-flap donor sites.

Methods In total, 100 practitioners participated in the “FreeFlap4U” study, representing 77.3% of the French national plastic surgery teams practicing microsurgery. To assess changing attitudes, we also compared microsurgeons below 40 years of age (called junior microsurgeons, JMs) with those above 40 years of age (called senior microsurgeons, SMs).

Results Perforator flaps were preferred for the first line (JMs) and second line (JMs and SMs) of treatment compared with other flaps. JMs emphasized lower donor site morbidity, whereas SMs favored reliability (p = 0.013) and considered perforator flaps as a second-line treatment. Radial forearm and transverse rectus abdominis flaps were largely dismissed due to high morbidity. Some microsurgeons were influenced by the potential secondary benefit of the integument sample at the donor site.

Conclusions Microsurgeons interviewed clearly moved toward perforator flaps, such as the anterolateral thigh, thoracodorsal artery perforator, and superficial circumflex iliac artery types, to cover common integumental defects. In the coming years, we believe that this choice, emitted by the microsurgeons for themselves, will be applied extensively by these surgeons for their patients.

Keywords

free flap - perforator flap - microsurgeons - donor site - reliability

• References

• 1 Sinna R, Qassemyar Q, Pérignon D, Benhaim T, Robbe M. About perforator flaps…20 years later [in French]. Ann Chir Plast Esthet 2011; 56 (2) 128-133
• 2 Chaput B, Garrido I, Pluvy I, Grolleau JL, Mojallal A. Free-style local perforator flaps: versatility of the V-Y design to reconstruct soft-tissue defects in the skin cancer population. Plast Reconstr Surg 2014; 133 (3) 432e-434e
• 3 Chaput B, Herlin C, Dast S, Sinna R. 4th Amiens' perforator flap course. 2nd Duplex ultrasound workshop for plastic surgeon [in French]. Ann Chir Plast Esthet 2015; 60 (6) 540-541
• 4 Bekara F, Herlin C, Mojallal A , et al. A systematic review and meta-analysis of perforator-pedicled propeller flaps in lower extremity defects: identification of risk factors for complications. Plast Reconstr Surg 2016; 137 (1) 314-331
• 5 Chaput B, Bertheuil N, Gandolfi S, Grolleau JL, Herlin C. Perforator detection with a hand-held Doppler device: importance of the learning curve. Burns 2015; 41 (1) 197
• 6 Bekara F, Herlin C, Somda S, de Runz A, Grolleau JL, Chaput B. Free versus perforator-pedicled propeller flaps in lower extremity reconstruction: what is the safest coverage? A meta-analysis. Microsurgery 2016;
• 7 Chaput B, Fade G, Sinna R, Gangloff D, Chavoin JP, Garrido I. “Body-lift”-like pattern for the simultaneous bilateral superior gluteal artery perforator flap in breast reconstruction. Aesthetic Plast Surg 2013; 37 (1) 52-55
• 8 Mayo JL, Canizares O, Torabi R, Allen Sr RJ, St Hilaire H. Expanding the applications of the profunda artery perforator flap. Plast Reconstr Surg 2016; 137 (2) 663-669
• 9 Herlin C, Sinna R, Chaput B. Muscle versus fasciocutaneous free flaps in heel reconstruction: systematic review and meta-analysis discussion. J Reconstr Microsurg 2015; 31 (3) 240-242
• 10 Brown JS, Thomas S, Chakrabati A, Lowe D, Rogers SN. Patient preference in placement of the donor-site scar in head and neck cancer reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 2008; 122 (1) 20e-22e
• 11 Wei FC, Jain V, Celik N, Chen HC, Chuang DC, Lin CH. Have we found an ideal soft-tissue flap? An experience with 672 anterolateral thigh flaps. Plast Reconstr Surg 2002; 109 (7) 2219-2226 , discussion 2227–2230
• 12 Knott PD, Seth R, Waters HH , et al. Short-term donor site morbidity: a comparison of the anterolateral thigh and radial forearm fasciocutaneous free flaps. Head Neck 2016; 38 (Suppl. 01) E945-E948
• 13 Heidekrueger PI, Tanna N, Weichman KE , et al. Added qualifications in microsurgery: consideration for subspecialty certification in microvascular surgery in Europe. J Reconstr Microsurg 2016; (e-pub ahead of print)
• 14 Moon SJ, Hong JP, Kang SR, Suh HS. Survey of reconstructive microsurgery training in Korea. J Reconstr Microsurg 2015; 31 (1) 54-58
• 15 Lee KT, Mun GH. A systematic review of functional donor-site morbidity after latissimus dorsi muscle transfer. Plast Reconstr Surg 2014; 134 (2) 303-314
• 16 Wolff KD. Perforator flaps: the next step in the reconstructive ladder?. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2015; 53 (9) 787-795