Assessment of Nursing Deficiencies in the Postoperative Care of Microsurgical Patients

Abstract

Background Close monitoring is crucial following successful flap surgery. Ideally, all patients undergoing microvascular reconstruction should be evaluated in a dedicated unit with specialized nurses; however, this is not always possible and there is often a varied skill mix of nursing staff. The purpose of this study was to identify deficiencies in microsurgical education among nursing staff in an effort to target future educational efforts.

Methods A 22-question electronic survey was sent out to all nursing staff at three sampled hospitals that manage microsurgical patients. Statistical analysis was performed to identify factors that predicted aptitude, comfort, and deficiencies in the treatment of microsurgical patients.

Results Of the 160 registered nurses sampled, 106 completed the survey completely (66%). A total of 59 nurses worked at a tertiary care academic institution (55%) and the remaining 47 nurses worked at one of two community hospitals (45%).

Regardless of whether the provider self-identified as a critical care or floor nurse, nurses from an academic medical center were significantly more comfortable with their ability to care for microsurgical patients when compared with their community medical center counterparts (p < 0.05). Furthermore, regardless of whether the provider self-identified as a critical care or the hospital setting where they worked, nurses with greater than 5 years of experience were significantly more comfortable with their ability to care for microsurgical patients when compared with nurses who had less than 5 years of experience (p < 0.05).

There was no correlation with comfort level and the ability to interpret various postoperative flap-monitoring technologies between intensive care unit nurses and floor nurses.

Conclusions We have identified that nurses with less than 5 years of experience or nurses in a community setting may be less comfortable with the care of postoperative microsurgical patients, especially if newer flap monitoring technologies are employed.

Keywords

free flap monitoring - microsurgery - perioperative care

• References

• 1 Disa JJ, Cordeiro PG, Hidalgo DA. Efficacy of conventional monitoring techniques in free tissue transfer: an 11-year experience in 750 consecutive cases. Plast Reconstr Surg 1999; 104 (1) 97-101
• 2 Furnas H, Rosen JM. Monitoring in microvascular surgery. Ann Plast Surg 1991; 26 (3) 265-272
• 3 Chen KT, Mardini S, Chuang DC , et al. Timing of presentation of the first signs of vascular compromise dictates the salvage outcome of free flap transfers. Plast Reconstr Surg 2007; 120 (1) 187-195
• 4 Storch JE, Rice J. Reconstructive plastic surgical nursing: Clinical management and wound care. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Blackwell; 2005
• 5 Chao AH, Lamp S. Current approaches to free flap monitoring. Plast Surg Nurs 2014; 34 (2) 52-56 , quiz 57–58
• 6 Chao AH, Meyerson J, Povoski SP, Kocak E. A review of devices used in the monitoring of microvascular free tissue transfers. Expert Rev Med Devices 2013; 10 (5) 649-660
• 7 Haskins N. Intensive nursing care of patients with a microvascular free flap after maxillofacial surgery. Intensive Crit Care Nurs 1998; 14 (5) 225-230
• 8 Maksud DP. Nursing management of patients following combined free flap mandible reconstruction. Plast Surg Nurs 1992; 12 (3) 95-105
• 9 Khan MA, Mohan A, Ahmed W, Rayatt S. Nursing monitoring and management of free and pedicled flaps—outcomes of teaching sessions on flap care. Plast Surg Nurs 2010; 30 (4) 213-216 , quiz 217–218
• 10 Flurry M, Brooke S, Micholetti B , et al. Nurse training with simulation: an innovative approach to teach complex microsurgery patient care. Ann Plast Surg 2012; 69 (4) 459-461
• 11 Haddock NT, Gobble RM, Levine JP. More consistent postoperative care and monitoring can reduce costs following microvascular free flap reconstruction. J Reconstr Microsurg 2010; 26 (7) 435-439