PDF herunterladen
J Reconstr Microsurg 2016; 32(04): 294-300
DOI: 10.1055/s-0035-1571248
Original Article
Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.

Evolution of Head and Neck Microvascular Reconstructive Strategy at an Academic Centre: An 18-Year Review

Annastiina Husso
1   Department of Plastic Surgery, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland
,
Antti A. Mäkitie
2   Department of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland
,
Jyrki Vuola
1   Department of Plastic Surgery, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland
,
Sinikka Suominen
1   Department of Plastic Surgery, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland
,
Leif Bäck
2   Department of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland
,
Patrik Lassus
1   Department of Plastic Surgery, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland
› Institutsangaben
Weitere Informationen

Publikationsverlauf

08. Dezember 2015

15. November 2015

Publikationsdatum:
14. Januar 2016 (online)

    Lizenzen und Reprints

Abstract

Background A remarkable development through the evolution of free flap techniques has led to the modern reconstructive head and neck surgery. This study aimed to review experiences from head and neck free-flap reconstructions performed at our institution over an 18-year period.

Methods Between 1995 and 2012, 594 free-flap operations were performed on 541 head and neck patients at the Department of Plastic Surgery, Helsinki University Hospital, Finland. We retrospectively recorded hospital chart data regarding patient demographics, tumor characteristics, surgical treatment, and outcome.

Results The mean age of patients increased from 53 years (1995–2000) to 56 (2007–2012), while the gender distribution remained constant (60% males). The most commonly used flap type between 1995 and 2000 was radial forearm flap (50%), while during the periods of 2001 through 2006 and 2007 through 2012 the anterolateral thigh flap was the most common method (42 and 36%, respectively). The number of different flap types and flap combinations increased during these periods (15 flap types during 1995 through 2000; 17 flap types during 2001 through 2006; and 24 flap types during 2007 through 2012). Despite a wider range of flap options used during the period 2001 through 2012, the overall flap survival rate (97%) remained constant. The prevalence of surgical complications decreased from 26% (2001 through 2006) to 21% (2007 through 2012).

Conclusions During the study period, the number of flap types increased and reconstructions became more individualized. The overall surgical complication rate decreased although the mean age of patients increased.

Keywords

free flap - head and neck - microvascular surgery - outcome - complication
 

  • References

  • 1 Brown JS, Magennis P, Rogers SN, Cawood JI, Howell R, Vaughan ED. Trends in head and neck microvascular reconstructive surgery in Liverpool (1992-2001). Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2006; 44 (5) 364-370
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Urken ML, Weinberg H, Buchbinder D , et al. Microvascular free flaps in head and neck reconstruction. Report of 200 cases and review of complications. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1994; 120 (6) 633-640
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Thorwarth M, Eulzer C, Bader R, Wolf C, Schmidt M, Schultze-Mosgau S. Free flap transfer in cranio-maxillofacial surgery: a review of the current data. Oral Maxillofac Surg 2008; 12 (3) 113-124
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Wong C-H, Wei F-C. Microsurgical free flap in head and neck reconstruction. Head Neck 2010; 32 (9) 1236-1245
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Dassonville O, Poissonnet G, Chamorey E , et al. Head and neck reconstruction with free flaps: a report on 213 cases. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2008; 265 (1) 85-95
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Gerressen M, Pastaschek CI, Riediger D , et al. Microsurgical free flap reconstructions of head and neck region in 406 cases: a 13-year experience. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2013; 71 (3) 628-635
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Pohlenz P, Klatt J, Schön G, Blessmann M, Li L, Schmelzle R. Microvascular free flaps in head and neck surgery: complications and outcome of 1000 flaps. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2012; 41 (6) 739-743
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Beausang ES, Ang EE, Lipa JE , et al. Microvascular free tissue transfer in elderly patients: the Toronto experience. Head Neck 2003; 25 (7) 549-553
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Coskunfirat OK, Chen HC, Spanio S, Tang YB. The safety of microvascular free tissue transfer in the elderly population. Plast Reconstr Surg 2005; 115 (3) 771-775
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Ferrari S, Copelli C, Bianchi B , et al. Free flaps in elderly patients: outcomes and complications in head and neck reconstruction after oncological resection. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 2013; 41 (2) 167-171
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Grénman R, Chevalier D, Gregoire V, Myers E, Rogers S. Treatment of head and neck cancer in the elderly: European Consensus (panel 6) at the EUFOS Congress in Vienna 2007. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2010; 267 (10) 1619-1621
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Amin AA, Baldwin BJ, Gürlek A , et al. Second free flaps in head and neck reconstruction. J Reconstr Microsurg 1998; 14 (6) 365-368 , discussion 368–369
    Artikel in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Ho MW, Brown JS, Magennis P , et al; Ho MW1. Salvage outcomes of free tissue transfer in Liverpool: trends over 18 years (1992-2009). Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2012; 50 (1) 13-18
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Lindau RH, Detwiller K, Wax MK. Buried free flaps in head and neck surgery: outcome analysis. Head Neck 2013; 35 (10) 1468-1470
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Mäkitie A, Aitasalo K, Pukander J , et al. Microvascular free flaps in head and neck cancer surgery in Finland 1986-1995. Acta Otolaryngol Suppl 1997; 529: 245-246
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Kansy K, Mueller AA, Mücke T , et al; DÖSAK Collaborative Group for Microsurgical Reconstruction. Microsurgical reconstruction of the head and neck—current concepts of maxillofacial surgery in Europe. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 2014; 42 (8) 1610-1613
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Nakatsuka T, Harii K, Asato H , et al. Analytic review of 2372 free flap transfers for head and neck reconstruction following cancer resection. J Reconstr Microsurg 2003; 19 (6) 363-368 , discussion 369
    Artikel in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Peters TT, Post SF, van Dijk BA , et al. Free flap reconstruction for head and neck cancer can be safely performed in both young and elderly patients after careful patient selection. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2015; 272 (10) 2999-3005
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Nouraei SA, Middleton SE, Hudovsky A , et al. Role of reconstructive surgery in the management of head and neck cancer: a national outcomes analysis of 11,841 reconstructions. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2015; 68 (4) 469-478
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Bianchi B, Copelli C, Ferrari S, Ferri A, Sesenna E. Free flaps: outcomes and complications in head and neck reconstructions. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 2009; 37 (8) 438-442
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Liu WW, Li H, Guo ZM , et al. Reconstruction of soft-tissue defects of the head and neck: radial forearm flap or anterolateral thigh flap?. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2011; 268 (12) 1809-1812
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Valentini V, Cassoni A, Marianetti TM, Battisti A, Terenzi V, Iannetti G. Anterolateral thigh flap for the reconstruction of head and neck defects: alternative or replacement of the radial forearm flap?. J Craniofac Surg 2008; 19 (4) 1148-1153
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Shaw RJ, Batstone MD, Blackburn TK, Brown JS. The anterolateral thigh flap in head and neck reconstruction: “pearls and pitfalls”. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2010; 48 (1) 5-10
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Offodile II AC, Aherrera AS, Wenger J, Tsai T, Orgill DP, Guo L. Impact of Specialty Training on the Association between Flap Size and Incidence of Complications following Microvascular Head and Neck Reconstruction for Cancer. J Reconstr Microsurg 2015; 31 (5) 348-354
    Artikel in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Wu CC, Lin PY, Chew KY, Kuo YR. Free tissue transfers in head and neck reconstruction: complications, outcomes and strategies for management of flap failure: analysis of 2019 flaps in single institute. Microsurgery 2014; 34 (5) 339-344
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Suh JD, Sercarz JA, Abemayor E , et al. Analysis of outcome and complications in 400 cases of microvascular head and neck reconstruction. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2004; 130 (8) 962-966
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Spyropoulou GA, Jeng SF, Hsieh CH, Tsimponis A, Shih HS. Microsurgical reconstruction for head and neck cancer in elderly patients. J Reconstr Microsurg 2014; 30 (2) 91-96
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Bhama PK, Patel SA, Khan U, Bhrany AD, Futran ND. Head and neck free flap reconstruction in patients older than 80 years. J Reconstr Microsurg 2014; 30 (8) 523-530
    Artikel in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Farwell DG, Reilly DF, Weymuller Jr EA, Greenberg DL, Staiger TO, Futran NA. Predictors of perioperative complications in head and neck patients. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2002; 128 (5) 505-511
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Rosenberg AJ, Van Cann EM, van der Bilt A, Koole R, van Es RJ. A prospective study on prognostic factors for free-flap reconstructions of head and neck defects. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2009; 38 (6) 666-670
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar