J Knee Surg 2016; 29(03): 188-193
DOI: 10.1055/s-0035-1569482
Special Focus Section
Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.

A Novel, Nonoperative Treatment Demonstrates Success for Stiff Total Knee Arthroplasty after Failure of Conventional Therapy

Morad Chughtai
1   Center for Joint Preservation and Replacement, Rubin Institute for Advanced Orthopedics, Baltimore, Maryland
Michael A. Mont
1   Center for Joint Preservation and Replacement, Rubin Institute for Advanced Orthopedics, Baltimore, Maryland
Chris Cherian
1   Center for Joint Preservation and Replacement, Rubin Institute for Advanced Orthopedics, Baltimore, Maryland
Jeffrey Jai Cherian
2   Department of Orthopedics, Philadelphia College of Osteopathic Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
Randa D. K. Elmallah
1   Center for Joint Preservation and Replacement, Rubin Institute for Advanced Orthopedics, Baltimore, Maryland
Qais Naziri
3   Department of Orthopaedics, SUNY Downstate Medical Center, Brooklyn, New York
Steven F. Harwin
4   Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Beth Israel Medical Center, New York
Anil Bhave
1   Center for Joint Preservation and Replacement, Rubin Institute for Advanced Orthopedics, Baltimore, Maryland
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

15 October 2015

01 November 2015

Publication Date:
29 December 2015 (online)


Introduction Certain patients continue to suffer from knee stiffness following total knee arthroplasty (TKA) despite undergoing conventional therapies. Astym therapy to these patients may offer an effective, safe, nonoperative treatment. This study evaluates the effects of Astym therapy upon (1) range of motion and (2) subjective functional improvements in post-TKA patients who suffered from stiffness recalcitrant to other nonoperative interventions.

Methods Twenty-three post-TKA patients (29 knees) who had recalcitrant knee stiffness were included in this study. Pre- and post-Astym improvements in range of motion and Knee Society scores were compared. We analyzed knees based on the presence of flexion deficit or contracture. Further stratification was made into knees that received Astym therapy before and after a 3-month period of standard rehabilitation. Differences in range of motion from pre- to post-Astym were evaluated by measuring (1) degree of flexion deficit or contracture and (2) total arc of passive motion. Improvements in subjective functional status were determined by evaluating Knee Society scores pre- and post-Astym therapy. A two-tailed Student t-test was used to compare weighted mean differences from pre- to post-Astym for the above parameters.

Results The mean flexion deficit improved significantly (p < 0.001) in all patients after Astym therapy. The mean flexion contracture improved significantly in (p = 0.001) in 91% of patients after Astym therapy. Knees with flexion deficits or contractures both improved in total arc of motion when compared with pretherapy. Overall, patients who underwent treatment with Astym therapy reported significant mean improvements in both Knee Society objective (80 vs. 57 points; p < 0.0001) and functional scores (80 vs. 54 points; p = 0.0003) when compared with their pretherapy objective and functional scores. No harms were reported.

Conclusion Astym therapy is a novel, nonoperative treatment that may be an effective treatment option for post-TKA patients suffering from persistent knee stiffness. Further studies are needed to validate this intervention as a part of cost-effective, standard treatment after TKA.

  • References

  • 1 Kim J, Nelson CL, Lotke PA. Stiffness after total knee arthroplasty. Prevalence of the complication and outcomes of revision. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2004; 86-A (7) 1479-1484
  • 2 Maloney WJ. The stiff total knee arthroplasty: evaluation and management. J Arthroplasty 2002; 17 (4) (Suppl. 01) 71-73
  • 3 Mauerhan DR, Mokris JG, Ly A, Kiebzak GM. Relationship between length of stay and manipulation rate after total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 1998; 13 (8) 896-900
  • 4 Ranawat CS, Ranawat AS, Mehta A. Total knee arthroplasty rehabilitation protocol: what makes the difference?. J Arthroplasty 2003; 18 (3) (Suppl. 01) 27-30
  • 5 Yercan HS, Sugun TS, Bussiere C, Ait Si Selmi T, Davies A, Neyret P. Stiffness after total knee arthroplasty: prevalence, management and outcomes. Knee 2006; 13 (2) 111-117
  • 6 Ritter MA, Lutgring JD, Davis KE, Berend ME. The effect of postoperative range of motion on functional activities after posterior cruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2008; 90 (4) 777-784
  • 7 Ritter MA, Lutgring JD, Davis KE, Berend ME, Pierson JL, Meneghini RM. The role of flexion contracture on outcomes in primary total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2007; 22 (8) 1092-1096
  • 8 Schiavone Panni A, Cerciello S, Vasso M, Tartarone M. Stiffness in total knee arthroplasty. J Orthop Traumatol 2009; 10 (3) 111-118
  • 9 Padua R, Ceccarelli E, Bondì R, Campi A, Padua L. Range of motion correlates with patient perception of TKA outcome. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2007; 460 (460) 174-177
  • 10 Seyler TM, Marker DR, Bhave A , et al. Functional problems and arthrofibrosis following total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2007; 89 (Suppl. 03) 59-69
  • 11 Sevier TL, Stegink-Jansen CW. Astym treatment vs. eccentric exercise for lateral elbow tendinopathy: a randomized controlled clinical trial. PeerJ 2015; 3: e967
  • 12 McCormack JR. The management of bilateral high hamstring tendinopathy with ASTYM® treatment and eccentric exercise: a case report. J Manual Manip Ther 2012; 20 (3) 142-146
  • 13 McCormack JR. The management of mid-portion achilles tendinopathy with astym® and eccentric exercise: a case report. Int J Sports Phys Ther 2012; 7 (6) 672-677
  • 14 Slaven EJ, Mathers J. Management of chronic ankle pain using joint mobilization and ASTYM® treatment: a case report. J Manual Manip Ther 2011; 19 (2) 108-112
  • 15 Davies CC, Brockopp DY. Use of ASTYM® treatment on scar tissue following surgical treatment for breast cancer: a pilot study. Rehabil Oncol 2010; 23 (3) 3-12
  • 16 Davidson CJ, Ganion LR, Gehlsen GM, Verhoestra B, Roepke JE, Sevier TL. Rat tendon morphologic and functional changes resulting from soft tissue mobilization. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1997; 29 (3) 313-319
  • 17 Noble PC, Scuderi GR, Brekke AC , et al. Development of a new Knee Society scoring system. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2012; 470 (1) 20-32
  • 18 Gehlsen GM, Ganion LR, Helfst R. Fibroblast responses to variation in soft tissue mobilization pressure. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1999; 31 (4) 531-535
  • 19 Halper J, Kjaer M. Basic components of connective tissues and extracellular matrix: elastin, fibrillin, fibulins, fibrinogen, fibronectin, laminin, tenascins and thrombospondins. Adv Exp Med Biol 2014; 802: 31-47
  • 20 McDonald JA, Kelley DG, Broekelmann TJ. Role of fibronectin in collagen deposition: Fab' to the gelatin-binding domain of fibronectin inhibits both fibronectin and collagen organization in fibroblast extracellular matrix. J Cell Biol 1982; 92 (2) 485-492
  • 21 Wilson JK, Sevier TL, Helfst R, Honing EW, Thomann A. Comparison of rehabilitation methods in the treatment of patellar tendinitis. J Sport Rehabil 2000; 9: 304-314
  • 22 Bozic KJ, Kamath AF, Ong K , et al. Comparative epidemiology of revision arthroplasty: failed THA poses greater clinical and economic burdens than failed TKA. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2015; 473 (6) 2131-2138