Early versus Late Feeding after Cesarean Delivery: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Abstract

Objective This study aims to evaluate whether early feeding after cesarean delivery (CD) shortens the time to pass flatus and bowel movement.

Methods Women at term undergoing CD were randomly assigned to start oral intake either within 6 hours (early feeding) or after 12 hours (late feeding) from surgery completion. Women with preeclampsia, or requiring emergent CD, additional bowel surgery, or the use of general anesthesia were excluded. Our primary outcome was time of passing first flatus following surgery completion. Secondary outcomes included time of first bowel sounds, time of first bowel movement, nausea/vomiting, and length of maternal hospital stay (clinicaltrials.gov identifier NCT02396485).

Results A total of 177 women were randomized to early (n  =  85) or late feeding (n  =  82). There was no loss to follow-up, and outcomes were available for all patients. There were no differences in baseline characteristics between the two groups. Early feeding resulted in shorter time to pass flatus (median [interquartile range], 715 [485–1,208] minutes vs. 1,300 [820–1,760] minutes; p < 0.001) and to have bowel sounds (232 [168–537.8] minutes vs. 554.5 [202–706] minutes; p = 0.001). Time to pass bowel movement was shorter in the early-feeding group, but did not reach significance. The groups did not differ in length of stay or in rates of nausea, vomiting, or ileus.

Conclusion In women undergoing CD, early oral intake is well tolerated and results in earlier return of bowel function.

Keywords

cesarean - feeding - pregnancy - postpartum

Note

None of the authors report any conflict of interest. Dr. Saade is the editor of the journal and is one of the coauthors of this article.

Presented at the 35th Annual Meeting of the Society for Maternal Fetal Medicine; February 2–7, 2015; San Diego, CA.

• References

• 1 Hsu YY, Hung HY, Chang SC, Chang YJ. Early oral intake and gastrointestinal function after cesarean delivery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Obstet Gynecol 2013; 121 (6) 1327-1334
• 2 Bar G, Sheiner E, Lezerovizt A, Lazer T, Hallak M. Early maternal feeding following caesarean delivery: a prospective randomised study. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2008; 87 (1) 68-71
• 3 Patolia DS, Hilliard RL, Toy EC, Baker B. Early feeding after cesarean: randomized trial. Obstet Gynecol 2001; 98 (1) 113-116
• 4 Burrows WR, Gingo Jr AJ, Rose SM , et al. Safety and efficacy of early postoperative solid food consumption after cesarean section. J Reprod Med 1995; 40 (6) 463-467
• 5 Kramer RL, Van Someren JK, Qualls CR, Curet LB. Postoperative management of cesarean patients: the effect of immediate feeding on the incidence of ileus. Obstet Gynecol 1996; 88 (1) 29-32
• 6 Weinstein L, Dyne PL, Duerbeck NB. The PROEF diet—a new postoperative regimen for oral early feeding. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1993; 168 (1 Pt 1) 128-131
• 7 Bauer AJ, Boeckxstaens GE. Mechanisms of postoperative ileus. Neurogastroenterol Motil 2004; 16 (Suppl. 02) 54-60
• 8 Fanning J, Hojat R. Safety and efficacy of immediate postoperative feeding and bowel stimulation to prevent ileus after major gynecologic surgical procedures. J Am Osteopath Assoc 2011; 111 (8) 469-472
• 9 Short V, Herbert G, Perry R , et al. Chewing gum for postoperative recovery of gastrointestinal function. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2015; 2 (2) CD006506