Pharmacopsychiatry 2015; 48(07): 274-278
DOI: 10.1055/s-0035-1565063
Original Paper
© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Relapse Prevention in Major Depressive Disorder After Successful Acute Electroconvulsive Treatment: a 6-month Double-blind Comparison of Three Fixed Dosages of Escitalopram and a Fixed Dose of Nortriptyline – Lessons from a Failed Randomised Trial of the Danish University Antidepressant Group (DUAG-7)

K. Martiny
1   Intensive Outpatient Unit for Affective Disorders (IAA), Psychiatric Center Copenhagen, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
,
E. R. Larsen
2   Department of Affective Disorders Mood Disorders Research Unit, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
,
R. W. Licht
3   Department of Clinical Medicine, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark
4   Aalborg University Hospital, Psychiatry, Aalborg, Denmark
,
C. T. Nielsen
5   Department of Mental Health Services, Esbjerg, Denmark
,
P. Damkier
6   Department of Clinical Chemistry & Pharmacology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
,
E. Refsgaard
7   Psychiatric Research Unit, Mental Health Centre North Zealand, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
,
M. Lunde
7   Psychiatric Research Unit, Mental Health Centre North Zealand, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
,
B. Straasø
7   Psychiatric Research Unit, Mental Health Centre North Zealand, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
,
E. M. Christensen
8   The Mood Disorder Clinic, Psychiatric Center Copenhagen, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
,
A. Lolk
9   Department of Psychiatry, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
,
J. Holmskov
9   Department of Psychiatry, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
,
C. H. Sørensen
9   Department of Psychiatry, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
,
I. Brødsgaard
2   Department of Affective Disorders Mood Disorders Research Unit, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
,
S. Z. Eftekhari
10   Psychiatric Center Glostrup, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
,
B. B. Bendsen
11   Psychiatric Center Frederiksberg, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
,
R. Klysner
11   Psychiatric Center Frederiksberg, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
,
I. M. Terp
10   Psychiatric Center Glostrup, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
,
J. K. Larsen
12   Psychiatric Center Gentofte, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
,
P. Vestergaard
2   Department of Affective Disorders Mood Disorders Research Unit, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
,
P. E. Buchholtz
2   Department of Affective Disorders Mood Disorders Research Unit, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
,
L. F. Gram
13   Clinical Pharmacology, Institute of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
,
P. Bech
7   Psychiatric Research Unit, Mental Health Centre North Zealand, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
,
and Danish University Antidepressant Group (DUAG*)› Institutsangaben
Weitere Informationen

Publikationsverlauf

Publikationsdatum:
03. November 2015 (online)

Preview

Abstract

Introduction: Electroconvulsive treatment (ECT) is an effective treatment for severe depression but carries a risk of relapse in the following months.

Methods: Major depressive disorder patients in a current episode attaining remission from ECT (17-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAM-D17) score≤9) received randomly escitalopram 10 mg, 20 mg, 30 mg or nortriptyline 100 mg as monotherapies and were followed for 6 months in a multicentre double-blind set-up. Primary endpoint was relapse (HAM-D17≥16).

Results: As inclusion rate was low the study was prematurely stopped with only 47 patients randomised (20% of the planned sample size). No statistically significant between-group differences could be detected. When all patients receiving escitalopram were compared with those receiving nortriptyline, a marginal superiority of nortriptyline was found (p=0.08). One third of patients relapsed during the study period, and one third completed.

Discussion: Due to small sample size, no valid efficacy inferences could be made. The outcome was poor, probably due to tapering off of non-study psychotropic drugs after randomisation; this has implications for future study designs.

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00660062