Pharmacopsychiatry 2015; 48(07): 274-278
DOI: 10.1055/s-0035-1565063
Original Paper
© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Relapse Prevention in Major Depressive Disorder After Successful Acute Electroconvulsive Treatment: a 6-month Double-blind Comparison of Three Fixed Dosages of Escitalopram and a Fixed Dose of Nortriptyline – Lessons from a Failed Randomised Trial of the Danish University Antidepressant Group (DUAG-7)

K. Martiny
1   Intensive Outpatient Unit for Affective Disorders (IAA), Psychiatric Center Copenhagen, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
,
E. R. Larsen
2   Department of Affective Disorders Mood Disorders Research Unit, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
,
R. W. Licht
3   Department of Clinical Medicine, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark
4   Aalborg University Hospital, Psychiatry, Aalborg, Denmark
,
C. T. Nielsen
5   Department of Mental Health Services, Esbjerg, Denmark
,
P. Damkier
6   Department of Clinical Chemistry & Pharmacology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
,
E. Refsgaard
7   Psychiatric Research Unit, Mental Health Centre North Zealand, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
,
M. Lunde
7   Psychiatric Research Unit, Mental Health Centre North Zealand, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
,
B. Straasø
7   Psychiatric Research Unit, Mental Health Centre North Zealand, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
,
E. M. Christensen
8   The Mood Disorder Clinic, Psychiatric Center Copenhagen, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
,
A. Lolk
9   Department of Psychiatry, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
,
J. Holmskov
9   Department of Psychiatry, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
,
C. H. Sørensen
9   Department of Psychiatry, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
,
I. Brødsgaard
2   Department of Affective Disorders Mood Disorders Research Unit, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
,
S. Z. Eftekhari
10   Psychiatric Center Glostrup, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
,
B. B. Bendsen
11   Psychiatric Center Frederiksberg, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
,
R. Klysner
11   Psychiatric Center Frederiksberg, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
,
I. M. Terp
10   Psychiatric Center Glostrup, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
,
J. K. Larsen
12   Psychiatric Center Gentofte, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
,
P. Vestergaard
2   Department of Affective Disorders Mood Disorders Research Unit, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
,
P. E. Buchholtz
2   Department of Affective Disorders Mood Disorders Research Unit, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
,
L. F. Gram
13   Clinical Pharmacology, Institute of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
,
P. Bech
7   Psychiatric Research Unit, Mental Health Centre North Zealand, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
,
and Danish University Antidepressant Group (DUAG*) › Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
03 November 2015 (online)

Abstract

Introduction: Electroconvulsive treatment (ECT) is an effective treatment for severe depression but carries a risk of relapse in the following months.

Methods: Major depressive disorder patients in a current episode attaining remission from ECT (17-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAM-D17) score≤9) received randomly escitalopram 10 mg, 20 mg, 30 mg or nortriptyline 100 mg as monotherapies and were followed for 6 months in a multicentre double-blind set-up. Primary endpoint was relapse (HAM-D17≥16).

Results: As inclusion rate was low the study was prematurely stopped with only 47 patients randomised (20% of the planned sample size). No statistically significant between-group differences could be detected. When all patients receiving escitalopram were compared with those receiving nortriptyline, a marginal superiority of nortriptyline was found (p=0.08). One third of patients relapsed during the study period, and one third completed.

Discussion: Due to small sample size, no valid efficacy inferences could be made. The outcome was poor, probably due to tapering off of non-study psychotropic drugs after randomisation; this has implications for future study designs.

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00660062

 
  • References

  • 1 Taylor S. Electroconvulsive therapy: a review of history, patient selection, technique, and medication management. South Med J 2007; 100: 494-498
  • 2 Jelovac A, Kolshus E, McLoughlin DM. Relapse following successful electroconvulsive therapy for major depression: a meta-analysis. Neuropsychopharmacology 2013; 38: 2467-2474
  • 3 Youssef NA, McCall WV. Relapse prevention after index electroconvulsive therapy in treatment-resistant depression. Ann Clin Psychiatry 2014; 26: 288-296
  • 4 Lauritzen L, Odgaard K, Clemmesen L et al. Relapse prevention by means of paroxetine in ECT-treated patients with major depression: a comparison with imipramine and placebo in medium-term continuation therapy. Acta Psychiatr Scand 1996; 94: 241-251
  • 5 Sackeim HA, Haskett RF, Mulsant BH et al. Continuation pharmacotherapy in the prevention of relapse following electroconvulsive therapy: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA 2001; 285: 1299-1307
  • 6 DUAG Homepage [homepage on the Internet]: DUAG; 2015 Available from: www.duag.dk
  • 7 EMEA . The European Agency for the Evaluation of Medicinal Products. Note for Guidance on Good Clinical Practice (CPMP/ICH/135/95). London: EMEA; 1997
  • 8 American Psychiatric Association . The Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders. Fourth Edition (DSM-IV). Washington D.C.: American Psychiatric Association; 1994
  • 9 Sheehan DV, Lecrubier Y, Sheehan KH et al. The Mini-International Neuropsychiatric Interview (M.I.N.I.): the development and validation of a structured diagnostic psychiatric interview for DSM-IV and ICD-10. J Clin Psychiatry 1998; 59 (Suppl. 20) 22-33
  • 10 Bech P. Clinical Psychometrics. Oxford: Wiley Blackwell; 2012
  • 11 Almac Group [homepage on the Internet] Available from: http://.com/almacgroup.com
  • 12 O’Sullivan RL, Fava M, Agustin C et al. Sensitivity of the six-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale. Acta Psychiatr Scand 1997; 95: 379-384
  • 13 Bech P, Rasmussen NA, Olsen LR et al. The sensitivity and specificity of the Major Depression Inventory, using the Present State Examination as the index of diagnostic validity. J Affect Disord 2001; 66: 159-164
  • 14 Bech P. Measuring the dimension of Psychological General Well-Being by the WHO-5. Quality of Life Newsletter (Mapi Research Institute) 2004; 32: 15-16
  • 15 Lingjaerde O, Ahlfors UG, Bech P et al. The UKU side effect rating scale. A new comprehensive rating scale for psychotropic drugs and a cross-sectional study of side effects in neuroleptic-treated patients. Acta Psychiatr Scand Suppl 1987; 334: 1-100
  • 16 EudraLex. Volume 9, Good Manufacturing Practices (GMP) ec.europa.eu/health/files/eudralex/vol-9/pdf/vol9_10-2004_en.pdf ed. European Commission
  • 17 Vuille F, Amey M, Baumann P. Use of plasma level monitoring of antidepressants in clinical practice. Towards an analysis of clinical utility. Pharmacopsychiatry 1991; 24: 190-195
  • 18 Licht RW. Danish University Antidepressant Group . Is it possible to evaluate true prophylactic efficacy of antidepressants in severely ill patients with recurrent depression? Lessons from a placebo-controlled trial. The fifth trial of the Danish University Antidepressant Group (DUAG-5). J Affect Disord 2013; 148: 286-290
  • 19 Ostad Haji E, Tadic A, Wagner S et al. Early improvement and serum concentrations of citalopram to predict antidepressant drug response of patients with major depression. Pharmacopsychiatry 2013; 46: 261-266
  • 20 Zimmerman M, Martinez JA, Attiullah N et al. Why do some depressed outpatients who are in remission according to the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale not consider themselves to be in remission?. J Clin Psychiatry 2012; 73: 790-795
  • 21 Bech P, Olsen LR, Kjoller M et al. Measuring well-being rather than the absence of distress symptoms: A comparison of the SF-36 Mental Health subscale and the WHO-Five Well-Being Scale. Int J Methods Psychiatr Res 2003; 12: 85-91
  • 22 Bliznak L, Berg R, Hage A et al. High rate of non-eligibility: methodological factors impacting on recruitment for a multicentre, double-blind study of paediatric patients with major depressive disorder. Pharmacopsychiatry 2013; 46: 23-28
  • 23 Yildiz A, Mantar A, Simsek S et al. Combination of pharmacotherapy with electroconvulsive therapy in prevention of depressive relapse: a pilot controlled trial. J ECT 2010; 26: 104-110
  • 24 Prudic J, Haskett RF, McCall WV et al. Pharmacological strategies in the prevention of relapse after electroconvulsive therapy. J ECT 2013; 29: 3-12
  • 25 Arain M, Campbell MJ, Cooper CL et al. What is a pilot or feasibility study? A review of current practice and editorial policy. BMC Med Res Methodol 2010; 10 67-2288-10-67