J Knee Surg 2016; 29(05): 436-442
DOI: 10.1055/s-0035-1564726
Original Article
Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.

Time Interval between Trauma and Arthroscopic Meniscal Repair Has No Influence on Clinical Survival

Robert J. P. van der Wal
1   Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology, Medical Center Haaglanden, The Hague, The Netherlands
,
Bregje J. W. Thomassen
1   Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology, Medical Center Haaglanden, The Hague, The Netherlands
,
Jan-Willem A. Swen
1   Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology, Medical Center Haaglanden, The Hague, The Netherlands
,
Ewoud R. A. van Arkel
1   Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology, Medical Center Haaglanden, The Hague, The Netherlands
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

16 May 2015

23 August 2015

Publication Date:
29 October 2015 (online)

Abstract

Arthroscopic meniscal repair is the gold standard for longitudinal peripheral meniscal tears. The time interval between trauma and meniscal repair remains controversial. The aim of this study was to evaluate failure rates and clinical outcome of arthroscopic meniscal repair in relation to chronicity of injury. A total of 238 meniscal repairs were performed in 234 patients. Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) was reconstructed in almost all ACL-deficient knees (130 out of 133). Time interval between injury and repair was divided into acute (< 2 weeks), subacute (> 2 to < 12 weeks), and chronic (> 12 weeks). Patients completed postal questionnaires to evaluate clinical outcome and failure rates. Study instruments included Lysholm, Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), and Tegner scoring systems. At a median follow-up of 41 months (interquartile range [IQR], 34–53 months) 55 medial and 10 lateral meniscal repairs failed (overall failure rate, 27%). There was a significant higher failure rate for medial meniscal repair (p < 0.05) and ACL-deficient knees without ACL reconstruction. Functional outcome scores showed only significant differences on the KOOS subscale “function in daily living” (95% confidence interval, 1.05–15.27, p < 0.05). No significant difference was found for any interval between trauma and repair. The interval between trauma and arthroscopic meniscal repair has no influence on the failure rate. Differences in survival rate of meniscal repair are more dependent on location of the lesion and ACL status, rather than chronicity of injury.

 
  • References

  • 1 Morgan CD. The “all-inside” meniscus repair. Arthroscopy 1991; 7 (1) 120-125
  • 2 Choi NH, Kim TH, Victoroff BN. Comparison of arthroscopic medial meniscal suture repair techniques: inside-out versus all-inside repair. Am J Sports Med 2009; 37 (11) 2144-2150
  • 3 Grant JA, Wilde J, Miller BS, Bedi A. Comparison of inside-out and all-inside techniques for the repair of isolated meniscal tears: a systematic review. Am J Sports Med 2012; 40 (2) 459-468
  • 4 Rosso C, Kovtun K, Dow W , et al. Comparison of all-inside meniscal repair devices with matched inside-out suture repair. Am J Sports Med 2011; 39 (12) 2634-2639
  • 5 Cannon Jr WD, Vittori JM. The incidence of healing in arthroscopic meniscal repairs in anterior cruciate ligament-reconstructed knees versus stable knees. Am J Sports Med 1992; 20 (2) 176-181
  • 6 Westermann RW, Wright RW, Spindler KP, Huston LJ, Wolf BR ; MOON Knee Group. Meniscal repair with concurrent anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: operative success and patient outcomes at 6-year follow-up. Am J Sports Med 2014; 42 (9) 2184-2192
  • 7 Espejo-Reina A, Serrano-Fernández JM, Martín-Castilla B, Estades-Rubio FJ, Briggs KK, Espejo-Baena A. Outcomes after repair of chronic bucket-handle tears of medial meniscus. Arthroscopy 2014; 30 (4) 492-496
  • 8 Popescu D, Sastre S, Caballero M , et al. Meniscal repair using the FasT-Fix device in patients with chronic meniscal lesions. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2010; 18 (4) 546-550
  • 9 Mesiha M, Zurakowski D, Soriano J, Nielson JH, Zarins B, Murray MM. Pathologic characteristics of the torn human meniscus. Am J Sports Med 2007; 35 (1) 103-112
  • 10 Roos EM, Roos HP, Lohmander LS, Ekdahl C, Beynnon BD. Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS)—development of a self-administered outcome measure. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 1998; 28 (2) 88-96
  • 11 Lysholm J, Gillquist J. Evaluation of knee ligament surgery results with special emphasis on use of a scoring scale. Am J Sports Med 1982; 10 (3) 150-154
  • 12 Tegner Y, Lysholm J. Rating systems in the evaluation of knee ligament injuries. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1985; (198) 43-49
  • 13 Flint JH, Wade AM, Giuliani J, Rue JP. Defining the terms acute and chronic in orthopaedic sports injuries: a systematic review. Am J Sports Med 2014; 42 (1) 235-241
  • 14 Kuikka PI, Sillanpää P, Mattila VM, Niva MH, Pihlajamäki HK. Magnetic resonance imaging in acute traumatic and chronic meniscal tears of the knee: a diagnostic accuracy study in young adults. Am J Sports Med 2009; 37 (5) 1003-1008
  • 15 Thoreux P, Réty F, Nourissat G , et al. Bucket-handle meniscal lesions: magnetic resonance imaging criteria for reparability. Arthroscopy 2006; 22 (9) 954-961
  • 16 Nepple JJ, Dunn WR, Wright RW. Meniscal repair outcomes at greater than five years: a systematic literature review and meta-analysis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2012; 94 (24) 2222-2227
  • 17 Pujol N, Panarella L, Selmi TA, Neyret P, Fithian D, Beaufils P. Meniscal healing after meniscal repair: a CT arthrography assessment. Am J Sports Med 2008; 36 (8) 1489-1495
  • 18 Paxton ES, Stock MV, Brophy RH. Meniscal repair versus partial meniscectomy: a systematic review comparing reoperation rates and clinical outcomes. Arthroscopy 2011; 27 (9) 1275-1288
  • 19 Bach Jr BR, Dennis M, Balin J, Hayden J. Arthroscopic meniscal repair: analysis of treatment failures. J Knee Surg 2005; 18 (4) 278-284
  • 20 Thompson WO, Thaete FL, Fu FH, Dye SF. Tibial meniscal dynamics using three-dimensional reconstruction of magnetic resonance images. Am J Sports Med 1991; 19 (3) 210-215 , discussion 215–216
  • 21 Allen CR, Wong EK, Livesay GA, Sakane M, Fu FH, Woo SL. Importance of the medial meniscus in the anterior cruciate ligament-deficient knee. J Orthop Res 2000; 18 (1) 109-115
  • 22 Ahmed AM, Burke DL. In-vitro measurement of static pressure distribution in synovial joints—Part I: Tibial surface of the knee. J Biomech Eng 1983; 105 (3) 216-225
  • 23 Peña E, Calvo B, Martinez MA, Palanca D, Doblaré M. Why lateral meniscectomy is more dangerous than medial meniscectomy. A finite element study. J Orthop Res 2006; 24 (5) 1001-1010
  • 24 Hoser C, Fink C, Brown C, Reichkendler M, Hackl W, Bartlett J. Long-term results of arthroscopic partial lateral meniscectomy in knees without associated damage. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2001; 83 (4) 513-516
  • 25 Chatain F, Adeleine P, Chambat P, Neyret P ; Société Française d'Arthroscopie. A comparative study of medial versus lateral arthroscopic partial meniscectomy on stable knees: 10-year minimum follow-up. Arthroscopy 2003; 19 (8) 842-849
  • 26 Pujol N, Beaufils P. Healing results of meniscal tears left in situ during anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a review of clinical studies. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2009; 17 (4) 396-401
  • 27 Shelbourne KD, Heinrich J. The long-term evaluation of lateral meniscus tears left in situ at the time of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Arthroscopy 2004; 20 (4) 346-351
  • 28 Steenbrugge F, Van Nieuwenhuyse W, Verdonk R, Verstraete K. Arthroscopic meniscus repair in the ACL-deficient knee. Int Orthop 2005; 29 (2) 109-112
  • 29 M Buckland D, Sadoghi P, Wimmer MD. , et al. Meta-analysis on biomechanical properties of meniscus repairs: are devices better than sutures?. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2015; 23 (1) 83-89