Early and Late Outcomes of Aortic Valve Replacement with Aortic Annular Enlargement: A Propensity Analysis

Abstract

Objectives Early and late outcomes were evaluated in Japanese patients undergoing aortic valve replacement (AVR) with or without aortic annular enlargement (AAE). Propensity matching adjusted for baseline differences in this study.

Methods Between January 2001 and July 2014, 589 patients underwent AVR for aortic stenosis. Of these, 58 patients received AVR with AAE (AAE group), and the others received standard AVR without annular enlargement (sAVR group). Of these 589 patients, 116 patients were selected using propensity score matching analysis. We compared early and late outcomes between the two groups.

Results Compared with the sAVR group, cardiopulmonary bypass time (177 ± 42 vs. 157 ± 39 minutes) and aortic cross-clamp time (126 ± 32 vs. 110 ± 34 minutes) were significantly longer in the AAE group. However, there were no significant differences between the AAE group and the sAVR group in 30-day mortality (1.7 vs. 3.4%) and in-hospital mortality (1.7 vs. 3.4%). There was no severe patient–prosthesis mismatch after AVR in the AAE group. The overall survival rate and freedom from cardiac events in the AAE group and in the sAVR group at 10 years were 92.4 versus 75.9% (p = 0.477) and 89.5 versus 82.8% (p = 0.076), respectively. No differences were found between the two groups.

Conclusions AAE was performed safely in Japanese patients with small aortic annulus. Surgical outcomes of the AAE group were not inferior to those of sAVR. Using this technique, which did not require advanced skills, it was easy to avoid severe patient–prosthesis mismatch.

Keywords

aortic valve replacement - annular enlargement - small aortic annulus

• References

• 1 Pibarot P, Dumesnil JG. Prosthesis-patient mismatch: definition, clinical impact, and prevention. Heart 2006; 92 (8) 1022-1029
• 2 Nicks R, Cartmill T, Bernstein L. Hypoplasia of the aortic root. The problem of aortic valve replacement. Thorax 1970; 25 (3) 339-346
• 3 Rahimtoola SH. The problem of valve prosthesis-patient mismatch. Circulation 1978; 58 (1) 20-24
• 4 Manouguian S, Seybold-Epting W. Patch enlargement of the aortic valve ring by extending the aortic incision into the anterior mitral leaflet. New operative technique. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1979; 78 (3) 402-412
• 5 Konno S, Imai Y, Iida Y, Nakajima M, Tatsuno K. A new method for prosthetic valve replacement in congenital aortic stenosis associated with hypoplasia of the aortic valve ring. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1975; 70 (5) 909-917
• 6 Nuñez L, Aguado MG, Pinto AG, Larrea JL. Enlargement of the aortic annulus by resecting the commissure between the left and noncoronary cusps. Tex Heart Inst J 1983; 10 (3) 301-303
• 7 Piérard S, de Meester C, Seldrum S , et al. Impact of preoperative symptoms on postoperative survival in severe aortic stenosis: implications for the timing of surgery. Ann Thorac Surg 2014; 97 (3) 803-809
• 8 Shahzeb KM, Imran BF, Asadullah K, Mehwish H. Prosthesis-patient mismatch causes a significantly increased risk of operative mortality in aortic valve replacement. Heart Surg Forum 2014; 17 (3) E127-E131
• 9 Takaseya T, Kawara T, Tokunaga S, Kohno M, Oishi Y, Morita S. Aortic valve replacement with 17-mm St. Jude Medical prostheses for a small aortic root in elderly patients. Ann Thorac Surg 2007; 83 (6) 2050-2053
• 10 Okamura H, Yamaguchi A, Tanaka M , et al. The 17-mm St. Jude Medical Regent valve is a valid option for patients with a small aortic annulus. Ann Thorac Surg 2009; 87 (1) 90-94
• 11 Nakamura Y, Nakano K, Tagusari O , et al. An alternative option for elderly patients with a small aortic annulus: the 16 mm ATS valve. J Heart Valve Dis 2009; 18 (6) 691-697
• 12 Ikeno Y, Okita Y. Long-term results of aortic valve replacement. Mechanical prostheses vs. bioprostheses. Circ J 2014; 78 (11) 2627-2630
• 13 Ennker J, Rosendahl U, Albert A, Dumlu E, Ennker IC, Florath I. Stentless bioprostheses in small aortic roots: impact of patient-prosthesis mismatch on survival and quality of life. J Heart Valve Dis 2005; 14 (4) 523-530
• 14 Urbanski PP, Dinstak W, Rents W, Heinz N, Diegeler A. Long-term results after aortic root replacement using self-assembled valve composite grafts in patients with small aortic annulus. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg 2014; 18 (2) 159-163
• 15 Ozaki S, Kawase I, Yamashita H , et al. A total of 404 cases of aortic valve reconstruction with glutaraldehyde-treated autologous pericardium. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2014; 147 (1) 301-306
• 16 Shrestha M, Maeding I, Höffler K , et al. Aortic valve replacement in geriatric patients with small aortic roots: are sutureless valves the future?. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg 2013; 17 (5) 778-782 , discussion 782
• 17 Makkar RR, Fontana GP, Jilaihawi H , et al; PARTNER Trial Investigators. Transcatheter aortic-valve replacement for inoperable severe aortic stenosis. N Engl J Med 2012; 366 (18) 1696-1704
• 18 Celiento M, Saccocci M, De Martino A , et al. Stability of aortic annulus enlargement during aortic valve replacement using a bovine pericardial patch: an 18-year clinical, echocardiographic, and angio-computed tomographic follow-up. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2014; 147 (3) 977-983
• 19 Castro LJ, Arcidi Jr JM, Fisher AL, Gaudiani VA. Routine enlargement of the small aortic root: a preventive strategy to minimize mismatch. Ann Thorac Surg 2002; 74 (1) 31-36 , discussion 36