Download PDF
J Reconstr Microsurg 2015; 31(08): 579-589
DOI: 10.1055/s-0035-1558461
Original Article
Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.

Improving Fellowship Training in Microsurgery: A Threshold Concepts Perspective on the Curricula of Fellowship Programs

Evgenios Evgeniou
1   Department of Plastic Surgery, Derriford Hospital, Plymouth, United Kingdom
,
Maria Tsironi
2   Department of ENT, North Staffordshire NHS Trust, Stoke-on-Trent, United Kingdom
,
David Riley
3   Educational Development Unit, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

16 December 2014

21 May 2015

Publication Date:
28 July 2015 (online)

    Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Background The theory of “threshold concepts” argues that within every discipline there is knowledge that transforms understanding and leads to a previously inaccessible way of thinking, without which the learner cannot progress. This study investigates the factors influencing the development of the characteristic ways of thinking and practicing as a microsurgeon during a microsurgical fellowship. We analyze the challenges in the development of these characteristics during focused fellowship training in microsurgery, of which some could potentially represent “threshold concepts.”

Methods A qualitative research methodology was followed. Semistructured interviews with trainers and trainees from microsurgical units in the United Kingdom (UK) and the United States (US) were conducted. Data were analyzed using the Dedoose (Manhattan Beach, CA) qualitative data analysis software and interpreted using the theory of “threshold concepts.”

Results Five trainees and four trainers from the UK and the US participated in this research project. Although initially some trainees had particular difficulty in developing their practical microsurgical skills, this improved rapidly with adequate practice. Cognitive skills and especially the ability to expect the unexpected and the ability recognize complications presented as a significant challenge for trainees and transformed their understandings regarding the qualities of a microsurgeon.

Conclusions Microsurgical fellowship curricula can be redesigned using the theory of threshold concepts, creating a dynamic framework that addresses individual trainee needs to develop the practical and cognitive skills necessary for independent practice of microsurgery.

Keywords

microsurgery - plastic surgery - training
 

  • References

  • 1 Carrel A. La technique operatoire des anastomoses vasculaires et la transplantation des visceres. Lyon Med 1902; 98: 859-863
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Daniel RK, Taylor GI. Distant transfer of an island flap by microvascular anastomoses. A clinical technique. Plast Reconstr Surg 1973; 52 (2) 111-117
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Tamai S. History of microsurgery. Plast Reconstr Surg 2009; 124 (6, Suppl): e282-e294
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Pratt GF, Rozen WM, Chubb D , et al. Modern adjuncts and technologies in microsurgery: an historical and evidence-based review. Microsurgery 2010; 30 (8) 657-666
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Pomahac B, Bueno EM, Sisk GC, Pribaz JJ. Current principles of facial allotransplantation: the Brigham and Women's Hospital Experience. Plast Reconstr Surg 2013; 131 (5) 1069-1076
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Wang WZ. Investigation of reperfusion injury and ischemic preconditioning in microsurgery. Microsurgery 2009; 29 (1) 72-79
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Fitzgerald JE, Milburn JA, Khera G, Davies RS, Hornby ST, Giddings CE. Clinical fellowships in surgical training: analysis of a national pan-specialty workforce survey. World J Surg 2013; 37 (5) 945-952
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Whitaker IS, Shokrollahi K. Subspecialization in plastic surgery: the importance of fellowship training. Ann Plast Surg 2009; 63 (4) 355
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Nugent E, Joyce C, Perez-Abadia G , et al. Factors influencing microsurgical skill acquisition during a dedicated training course. Microsurgery 2012; 32 (8) 649-656
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Atkins JL, Kalu PU, Lannon DA, Green CJ, Butler PE. Training in microsurgical skills: Does course-based learning deliver?. Microsurgery 2005; 25 (6) 481-485
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Gould SH. The role of the microsurgical laboratory in orthopedic training programs. Orthopedics 1986; 9 (6) 881-882
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Hui KC, Zhang F, Shaw WW , et al. Learning curve of microvascular venous anastomosis: a never ending struggle?. Microsurgery 2000; 20 (1) 22-24
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Brosious JP, Tsuda ST, Menezes JM , et al. Objective evaluation of skill acquisition in novice microsurgeons. J Reconstr Microsurg 2012; 28 (8) 539-542
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Jeong HS, Moon MS, Kim HS, Lee HK, Yi SY. Microsurgical training with fresh chicken legs. Ann Plast Surg 2013; 70 (1) 57-61
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Lausada NR, Escudero E, Lamonega R, Dreizzen E, Raimondi JC. Use of cryopreserved rat arteries for microsurgical training. Microsurgery 2005; 25 (6) 500-501
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Nam SM, Shin HS, Kim YB, Park ES, Choi CY. Microsurgical training with porcine thigh infusion model. J Reconstr Microsurg 2013; 29 (5) 303-306
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Bates BJ, Wimalawansa SM, Monson B, Rymer MC, Shapiro R, Johnson RM. A simple cost-effective method of microsurgical simulation training: the turkey wing model. J Reconstr Microsurg 2013; 29 (9) 615-618
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Sakrak T, Köse AA, Karabağli Y, Koçman AE, Ozbayoğlu AC, Cetįn C. Rat tail revascularization model for advanced microsurgery training and research. J Reconstr Microsurg 2011; 27 (7) 391-396
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Lannon DA, Atkins JA, Butler PE. Non-vital, prosthetic, and virtual reality models of microsurgical training. Microsurgery 2001; 21 (8) 389-393
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Lorenzo AR, Alvarez A, Garcia-Barreiro J, Centeno A, Lopez E, Martelo F. Design and creation of an experimental program of advanced training in reconstructive microsurgery. Microsurgery 2006; 26 (6) 421-428
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Balasundaram I, Aggarwal R, Darzi LA. Development of a training curriculum for microsurgery. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2010; 48 (8) 598-606
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Lascar I, Totir D, Cinca A , et al. Training program and learning curve in experimental microsurgery during the residency in plastic surgery. Microsurgery 2007; 27 (4) 263-267
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Chan WY, Matteucci P, Southern SJ. Validation of microsurgical models in microsurgery training and competence: a review. Microsurgery 2007; 27 (5) 494-499
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Selber JC, Chang EI, Liu J , et al. Tracking the learning curve in microsurgical skill acquisition. Plast Reconstr Surg 2012; 130 (4) 550e-557e
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Chan W, Niranjan N, Ramakrishnan V. Structured assessment of microsurgery skills in the clinical setting. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2010; 63 (8) 1329-1334
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Studinger R, Bradford M, Jackson I. Microsurgical training: Is it adequate for the operating room?. Eur J Plast Surg 2005; 28 (2) 91-93
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Meyer J, Land R. Threshold concepts and troublesome knowledge: linkages to ways of thinking and practicing within the disciplines. In: Rust C, , ed. Improving Student Learning: Theory and Practice–Ten Years On. Oxford, United Kingdom: OCSLD; 2003: 412-424
    Google Scholar
  • 28 Land R, Cousin G, Meyer JH, Davies P. Threshold concepts and troublesome knowledge: implications for course design and evaluation. In: Improving Student Learning: Equality and Diversity; Oxford, United Kingdom: OCSLD; 2005
    Google Scholar
  • 29 Davies P. Threshold concepts: How can we recognize them?. In: Meyer J, Land R, , eds. Overcoming Barriers to Student Understanding: Threshold Concepts and Troublesome Knowledge. ; London, United Kingdom: Routledge; 2006: 70-84
    Google Scholar
  • 30 Entwistle N. Learning outcomes and ways of thinking across contrasting disciplines and settings in higher education. Curric J 2005; 16 (1) 67-82
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 31 Perkins D. The many faces of constructivism. Educ Leadersh 1999; 57 (3) 6-11
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 32 Perkins D. Constructivism and troublesome knowledge. In: Meyer J, Land R, , eds. Overcoming Barriers to Student Understanding: Threshold Concepts and Troublesome Knowledge. London, United Kingdom: Routledge; 2006: 33-47
    Google Scholar
  • 33 Meyer J, Land R. Threshold concepts and troublesome knowledge: an introduction. In: Meyer J, Land R, , eds. Overcoming Barriers to Student Understanding: Threshold Concepts and Troublesome Knowledge. London, United Kingdom: Routledge; 2006: 3-18
    Google Scholar
  • 34 Meyer J, Land R. Threshold concepts and troublesome knowledge: issues of liminality. In: Meyer J, Land R, , eds. Overcoming Barriers to Student Understanding: Threshold Concepts and Troublesome Knowledge. London, United Kingdom: Routledge; 2006: 19-32
    Google Scholar
  • 35 Land R, Meyer J. The scalpel and the mask: Threshold concepts and surgical education. In: Fry H, Kneebone R, , eds. Surgical Education: Theorising an Emerging Domain. Netherlands: Springer; 2011: 91-106
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 36 Kinchin IM, Cabot LB, Kobus M, Woolford M. Threshold concepts in dental education. Eur J Dent Educ 2011; 15 (4) 210-215
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 37 Patton M. Qualitative research and evaluation methods. Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications; 2002
    Google Scholar
  • 38 Seidman I. Interviewing as qualitative research: A guide for researchers in education and the social sciences. New York, NY: Teachers college press; 2006
    Google Scholar