Download PDF
Aktuelle Neurologie 2015; 42(06): 315-322
DOI: 10.1055/s-0035-1555761
Neues in der Neurologie
© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Neue medikamentöse und neuromodulatorische Therapieansätze zur Behandlung der Migräne

New Drug and Neuromodulatory Targets in Migraine Treatment
D. Holle
1   Klinik für Neurologie, Universitätsklinikum Essen
,
H.C. Diener
1   Klinik für Neurologie, Universitätsklinikum Essen
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
12 August 2015 (online)

Also available at
    Permissions and Reprints

Zusammenfassung

Trotz vorhandener Therapiemöglichkeiten sind die Wirksamkeit und Verträglichkeit vieler Präparate zur Behandlung der Migräne oftmals unbefriedigend und unzureichend. Daher liegen die Hoffnungen vieler Patienten und Behandler auf neuen Medikamenten und neuromodulatorischen Behandlungsansätzen, die derzeit in klinischen Studien getestet werden. In der Akuttherapie der Migräne wurden und werden verschiedene Präparate untersucht, die u. a. am CGRP-, TRPV1-, Glutamat- oder GABAA-Rezeptoren angreifen. Die bisher veröffentlichten Studienergebnisse sind leider weniger vielversprechend als die ursprünglichen prä-klinischen Daten vermuten ließen. Die besten Studienergebnisse liegen bezüglich humanisierter Antikörper gegen CGRP sowie den CGRP-Rezeptor vor, die in der prophylaktischen Therapie der Migräne eingesetzt werden können. Auch für Candesartan liegen Studienergebnisse vor, die den Einsatz in der prophylaktischen Migränetherapie rechtfertigen. Die vorliegenden Studienergebnisse zum Einsatz neuromodulativer Verfahren sind bislang widersprüchlich. Insbesondere invasive Verfahren sollten der chronischen Migräne vorbehalten sein und nur im Rahmen klinischer Studien eingesetzt werden.

Abstract

Despite various therapeutic options in the drug treatment of migraine, the treatment outcome is often unsatisfactory and insufficient. Many patients and doctors therefore are hoping for new migraine drugs as well as neuromodulatory approaches which are currently being investigated in clinical studies. Several drugs are being tested for acute migraine therapy, targeting the CGRP, TRPV1, glutamate or GABAA receptor. Unfortunately, the results of the clinical trial were less promising than preclinical data let assume. The most efficient drug seems to be humanized antibodies against CGRP or its receptor which can be used for prophylactic migraine treatment. Candesartan might be also efficient in the prophylactic treatment if first-line medication shows no efficacy or cannot be used because of side effects or contraindications. Clinical data on the efficacy of neuromodulatory approaches are rather inconsistent. Especially invasive approaches should only be used in chronic migraine and within clinical trials.

Schlüsselwörter

Migräne - CGRP - Neuromodulation

Keywords

migraine - CGRP - neuromodulation
 

  • Literatur

  • 1 Roberto G, Raschi E, Piccinni C et al. Adverse cardiovascular events associated with triptans and ergotamines for treatment of migraine: systematic review of observational studies. Cephalalgia 2015; 35: 118-131
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Diener H-C, Dodick DW, Goadsby PJ et al. Identification of negative predictors of pain-free response to triptans: analysis of the eletriptan database. Cephalalgia 2008; 28: 35-40
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Dodick DW, Martin VT, Smith T et al. Cardiovascular tolerability and safety of triptans: a review of clinical data. Headache 2004; 44 (Suppl. 01) S20-S30
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Doods H, Hallermayer G, Wu D et al. Pharmacological profile of BIBN4096BS, the first selective small molecule CGRP antagonist. Br J Pharmacol 2000; 129: 420-423
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Olesen J, Diener H-C, Husstedt IW et al. Calcitonin gene-related peptide receptor antagonist BIBN 4096 BS for the acute treatment of migraine. N Engl J Med 2004; 350: 1104-1110
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Connor KM, Shapiro RE, Diener H-C et al. Randomized, controlled trial of telcagepant for the acute treatment of migraine. Neurology 2009; 73: 970-977
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Ho TW, Ferrari MD, Dodick DW et al. Efficacy and tolerability of MK-0974 (telcagepant), a new oral antagonist of calcitonin gene-related peptide receptor, compared with zolmitriptan for acute migraine: a randomised, placebo-controlled, parallel-treatment trial. Lancet 2008; 372: 2115-2123
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Ho TW, Mannix LK, Fan X et al. Randomized controlled trial of an oral CGRP receptor antagonist, MK-0974, in acute treatment of migraine. Neurology 2008; 70: 1304-1312
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Ho TW, Connor KM, Zhang Y et al. Randomized controlled trial of the CGRP receptor antagonist telcagepant for migraine prevention. Neurology 2014; 83: 958-966
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Hewitt DJ, Aurora SK, Dodick DW et al. Randomized controlled trial of the CGRP receptor antagonist MK-3207 in the acute treatment of migraine. Cephalalgia 2011; 31: 712-722
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Diener H-C, Barbanti P, Dahlöf C et al. BI 44370 TA, an oral CGRP antagonist for the treatment of acute migraine attacks: results from a phase II study. Cephalalgia 2011; 31: 573-584
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Marcus R, Goadsby PJ, Dodick D et al. BMS-927711 for the acute treatment of migraine: a double-blind, randomized, placebo controlled, dose-ranging trial. Cephalalgia 2014; 34: 114-125
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Peroutka SJ. Clinical trials update. 2013: year in review. Headache 2014; 54: 189-194
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Nelson DL, Phebus LA, Johnson KW et al. Preclinical pharmacological profile of the selective 5-HT1F receptor agonist lasmiditan. Cephalalgia 2010; 30: 1159-1169
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Goadsby PJ, Classey JD. Evidence for serotonin (5-HT)1B, 5-HT1D and 5-HT1F receptor inhibitory effects on trigeminal neurons with craniovascular input. Neuroscience 2003; 122: 491-498
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Färkkilä M, Diener H-C, Géraud G et al. Efficacy and tolerability of lasmiditan, an oral 5-HT(1F) receptor agonist, for the acute treatment of migraine: a phase 2 randomised, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, dose-ranging study. Lancet Neurol 2012; 11: 405-413
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Ferrari MD, Färkkilä M, Reuter U et al. Acute treatment of migraine with the selective 5-HT1F receptor agonist lasmiditan – a randomised proof-of-concept trial. Cephalalgia 2010; 30: 1170-1178
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Bhatt DK, Gupta S, Jansen-Olesen I et al. NXN-188, a selective nNOS inhibitor and a 5-HT1B/1D receptor agonist, inhibits CGRP release in preclinical migraine models. Cephalalgia 2013; 33: 87-100
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Messlinger K, Lennerz JK, Eberhardt M et al. CGRP and NO in the trigeminal system: mechanisms and role in headache generation. Headache 2012; 52: 1411-1427
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Villalón CM, Olesen J. The role of CGRP in the pathophysiology of migraine and efficacy of CGRP receptor antagonists as acute antimigraine drugs. Pharmacol Ther 2009; 124: 309-323
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Hougaard A, Hauge A, Guo S et al. The nitric oxide synthase inhibitor and serotonin-receptor agonist NXN-188 during aura phase of migraine with aura: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled cross-over study. Scan J Pain 2012; 4: 48-52
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Lassen LH, Ashina M, Christiansen I et al. Nitric oxide synthase inhibition in migraine. Lancet 1997; 349: 401-402
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Alderton WK, Angell ADR, Craig C et al. GW274150 and GW273629 are potent and highly selective inhibitors of inducible nitric oxide synthase in vitro and in vivo. Br J Pharmacol 2005; 145: 301-312
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Meng J, Ovsepian SV, Wang J et al. Activation of TRPV1 mediates calcitonin gene-related peptide release, which excites trigeminal sensory neurons and is attenuated by a retargeted botulinum toxin with anti-nociceptive potential. J Neurosci 2009; 29: 4981-4992
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Chizh BA, O’Donnell MB, Napolitano A et al. The effects of the TRPV1 antagonist SB-705498 on TRPV1 receptor-mediated activity and inflammatory hyperalgesia in humans. Pain 2007; 132: 132-141
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Chizh BA, Palmer A, Lai R et al. A randomised, two-period cross-over study to investigate the efficacy of the TRPV1 antagonist SB-705498 in acute migraine. http://www.efic-congressorg/showabstractphp?abstract=702:EFIC Pain in Europe V; 2009
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Diamond S, Freitag F, Phillips SB et al. Intranasal civamide for the acute treatment of migraine headache. Cephalalgia 2000; 20: 597-602
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Sánchez-Porras R, Santos E, Schöll M et al. The effect of ketamine on optical and electrical characteristics of spreading depolarizations in gyrencephalic swine cortex. Neuropharmacology 2014; 84: 52-61
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Kaube H, Herzog J, Käufer T et al. Aura in some patients with familial hemiplegic migraine can be stopped by intranasal ketamine. Neurology 2000; 55: 139-141
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Afridi SK, Giffin NJ, Kaube H et al. A randomized controlled trial of intranasal ketamine in migraine with prolonged aura. Neurology 2013; 80: 642-647
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 31 Alt A, Weiss B, Ogden AM et al. In vitro and in vivo studies in rats with LY293558 suggest AMPA/kainate receptor blockade as a novel potential mechanism for the therapeutic treatment of anxiety disorders. Psychopharmacology 2006; 185: 240-247
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 32 Sang CN, Ramadan NM, Wallihan RG et al. LY293558, a novel AMPA/GluR5 antagonist, is efficacious and well-tolerated in acute migraine. Cephalalgia 2004; 24: 596-602
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 33 Johnson KW, Nisenbaum E, Johnson MP et al. Innovative drug development for headache disorders:glutamate. In: Olesen J, Ramadan N. Hrsg Innovative Drug Development for Headache Disorders. New York: Frontiers in Headache Research; 2008: 185-194
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 34 Gomez-Mancilla B, Brand R, Jürgens TP et al. Randomized, multicenter trial to assess the efficacy, safety and tolerability of a single dose of a novel AMPA receptor antagonist BGG492 for the treatment of acute migraine attacks. Cephalalgia 2014; 34: 103-113
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 35 Goadsby PJ, Keywood C. Investigation of the role of mGluR5 inhibition in migraine: a proof of concept study of ADX10059 in acute treatment of migraine. Cephalalgia 2009; 7
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 36 Soleimanpour H, Ghafouri RR, Taheraghdam A et al. Effectiveness of intravenous dexamethasone versus propofol for pain relief in the migraine headache: a prospective double blind randomized clinical trial. BMC Neurol 2012; 12: 114
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 37 Moshtaghion H, Heiranizadeh N, Rahimdel A et al. The Efficacy of Propofol vs. Subcutaneous Sumatriptan for Treatment of Acute Migraine Headaches in the Emergency Department: A Double-Blinded Clinical Trial. Pain Pract 2014; DOI: 10.1111. (Epub ahead of print)
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 38 Rech MA, Donahey E, Cappiello Dziedzic JM et al. New drugs of abuse. Pharmacotherapy 2015; 35: 189-197
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 39 Dodick DW, Goadsby PJ, Spierings ELH et al. Safety and efficacy of LY2951742, a monoclonal antibody to calcitonin gene-related peptide, for the prevention of migraine: a phase 2, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Lancet Neurol 2014; 13: 885-892
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 40 Dodick DW, Goadsby PJ, Silberstein SD et al. Safety and efficacy of ALD403, an antibody to calcitonin gene-related peptide, for the prevention of frequent episodic migraine: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, exploratory phase 2 trial. Lancet Neurol 2014; 13: 1100-1107
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 41 Bigal ME, Escandon R, Bronson M et al. Safety and tolerability of LBR-101, a humanized monoclonal antibody that blocks the binding of CGRP to its receptor: Results of the Phase 1 program. Cephalalgia 2013; 34: 483-492
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 42 Shi L, Rao S, King CH et al. AMG 334, the first potent and selective human monoclonal antibody against the CGRP receptor (Abstract). Headache 2014; 54: 1417-1418
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 43 Diener H-C. CGRP as a new target in prevention and treatment of migraine. Lancet Neurol 2014; 13: 1065-1067
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 44 Bradley DP, Smith MI, Netsiri C et al. Diffusion-weighted MRI used to detect in vivo modulation of cortical spreading depression: comparison of sumatriptan and tonabersat. Exp Neurol 2001; 172: 342-353
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 45 Parsons AA, Bingham S, Raval P et al. Tonabersat (SB-220453) a novel benzopyran with anticonvulsant properties attenuates trigeminal nerve-induced neurovascular reflexes. Br J Pharmacol 2001; 132: 1549-1557
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 46 Smith MI, Read SJ, Chan WN et al. Repetitive cortical spreading depression in a gyrencephalic feline brain: inhibition by the novel benzoylamino-benzopyran SB-220453. Cephalalgia 2000; 20: 546-553
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 47 Goadsby PJ, Ferrari MD, Csanyi A et al. Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, proof-of-concept study of the cortical spreading depression inhibiting agent tonabersat in migraine prophylaxis. Cephalalgia 2009; 29: 742-750
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 48 Hauge AW, Asghar MS, Schytz HW et al. Effects of tonabersat on migraine with aura: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled crossover study. Lancet Neurol 2009; 8: 718-723
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 49 Silberstein SD, Schoenen J, Göbel H et al. Tonabersat, a gap-junction modulator: efficacy and safety in two randomized, placebo-controlled, dose-ranging studies of acute migraine. Cephalalgia 2009; 29 (Suppl. 02) 17-27
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 50 Ferguson AV, Samson WK. The orexin/hypocretin system: a critical regulator of neuroendocrine and autonomic function. Front Neuroendocrinol 2003; 24: 141-150
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 51 Holland P, Goadsby PJ. The hypothalamic orexinergic system: pain and primary headaches. Headache 2007; 47: 951-962
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 52 Samson WK, Taylor MM, Ferguson AV. Non-sleep effects of hypocretin/orexin. Sleep Med Rev 2005; 9: 243-252
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 53 Giffin NJ, Ruggiero L, Lipton RB et al. Premonitory symptoms in migraine: an electronic diary study. Neurology 2003; 60: 935-940
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 54 Winrow CJ, Gotter AL, Cox CD et al. Pharmacological characterization of MK-6096 – a dual orexin receptor antagonist for insomnia. Neuropharmacology 2012; 62: 978-987
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 55 Chabi A, Zhang Y, Jackson S et al. Randomized controlled trial of the orexin receptor antagonist filorexant for migraine prophylaxis. Cephalalgia 2015; 35: 379-388
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 56 Rolan P, Hutchinson M, Johnson K. Ibudilast: a review of its pharmacology, efficacy and safety in respiratory and neurological disease. Expert Opin Pharmacother 2009; 10: 2897-2904
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 57 Stovner LJ, Linde M, Gravdahl GB et al. A comparative study of candesartan versus propranolol for migraine prophylaxis: A randomised, triple-blind, placebo-controlled, double cross-over study. Cephalalgia 2013; 34: 523-532
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 58 Cady RK, Mathew N, Diener H-C et al. Evaluation of carisbamate for the treatment of migraine in a randomized, double-blind trial. Headache 2009; 49: 216-226
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 59 Saper JR, Dodick DW, Silberstein SD et al. Occipital nerve stimulation for the treatment of intractable chronic migraine headache: ONSTIM feasibility study. Cephalalgia 2011; 31: 271-285
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 60 Kinfe TM, Schuss P, Vatter H. Occipital nerve block prior to occipital nerve stimulation for refractory chronic migraine and chronic cluster headache: Myth or prediction?. Cephalalgia 2015; 35: 359-362
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 61 Lipton RB, Goadsby PJ, Cady R et al. PRISM study: occipital nerve stimulation for treatment-refractory migraine. (Abstract). Cephalalgia 2009; 29 (Suppl. 01)
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 62 Silberstein SD, Dodick DW, Saper J et al. Safety and efficacy of peripheral nerve stimulation of the occipital nerves for the management of chronic migraine: results from a randomized, multicenter, double-blinded, controlled study. Cephalalgia 2012; 32: 1165-1179
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 63 Khan S, Schoenen J, Ashina M. Sphenopalatine ganglion neuromodulation in migraine: what is the rationale?. Cephalalgia 2014; 34: 382-391
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 64 Cady R, Saper J, Dexter K et al. A double-blind, placebo-controlled study of repetitive transnasal sphenopalatine ganglion blockade with tx360(®) as acute treatment for chronic migraine. Headache 2015; 55: 101-116
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 65 Cady RK, Saper J, Dexter K et al. Long-Term Efficacy of a Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Randomized Study for Repetitive Sphenopalatine Blockade With Bupivacaine vs Saline With the Tx360(®) Device for Treatment of Chronic Migraine. Headache 2015; DOI: 10.1111. (Epub ahead of print)
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 66 Tepper SJ, Rezai A, Narouze S et al. Acute treatment of intractable migraine with sphenopalatine ganglion electrical stimulation. Headache 2009; 49: 983-989
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 67 Chen R, Cros D, Curra A et al. The clinical diagnostic utility of transcranial magnetic stimulation: report of an IFCN committee. Clin Neurophysiol 2008; 119: 504-532
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 68 Holland P, Schembri C, Fredrick J et al. Transcranial magnetic stimulation for the treatment of migraine aura. Neurology 2009; 92 (Suppl. 03) A250
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 69 Lipton RB, Dodick DW, Silberstein SD et al. Single-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation for acute treatment of migraine with aura: a randomised, double-blind, parallel-group, sham-controlled trial. Lancet Neurol 2010; 9: 373-380
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 70 Bhola R, Kinsella E, Goadsby PJ. Update of the UK post market pilot programme with single pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation (sTMS) for the acute treatement of migraine (Abstrakt). Headache 2014; 54: 1426
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 71 Dodick DW, Schembri CT, Helmuth M et al. Transcranial magnetic stimulation for migraine: a safety review. Headache 2010; 50: 1153-1163
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 72 Possible Health Effects of Exposure to Residential Electric and Magnetic Fields. Committee on the Possible Effects of Electromagnetic Fields on biologic Systems of the National Research Council.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 73 Scientific Committee on Emerging and Newly Identified Health Risks . Possible Effects of Elektromagnetic Fields 8EMF) on Human Health. HCPD EC. (ed.) Brussels: European Commission; 2007
    Google Scholar
  • 74 Cecchini AP, Mea E, Tullo V et al. Vagus nerve stimulation in drug-resistant daily chronic migraine with depression: preliminary data. Neurol Sci 2009; 30 (Suppl. 01) S101-S104
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 75 Hord ED, Evans MS, Mueed S et al. The effect of vagus nerve stimulation on migraines. J Pain 2003; 4: 530-534
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 76 Lenaerts ME, Oommen KJ, Couch JR et al. Can vagus nerve stimulation help migraine?. Cephalalgia 2008; 28: 392-395
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 77 Magis D, Gerard P, Schoenen J. Transcutaneous Vagus Nerve Stimulation (tVNS) for headache prophylaxis: initial experience. J Headache Pain 2013; 14 (Suppl. 01) 198
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 78 Schoenen J, Vandersmissen B, Jeangette S et al. Migraine prevention with a supraorbital transcutaneous stimulator: a randomized controlled trial. Neurology 2013; 80: 697-704
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 79 Magis D, Sava S, d’ Elia TS et al. Safety and patients’ satisfaction of transcutaneous supraorbital neurostimulation (tSNS) with the Cefaly® device in headache treatment: a survey of 2 313 headache sufferers in the general population. J Headache Pain 2013; 14: 95
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar